patrick.net

Bear in mind that Chappelle performed a lot of that Jussie Smollet material while rumors were swirling that it might be the the case that this was a hoax (but that day Chicago police tweeted out in response that there was “no evidence to say that this is a hoax.”). In fact, (he alludes to this in his act), a journalist wrote up and published much Chappelle's Smollett show material and Chappelle almost became a bug on the windshield of cancel culture. Lucky for him, the next day two suspects, Nigerian brothers, were arrested in connection with the attack on Smollett.

:
LOL

Same critics that gave gay TLJ 91%

I wonder how much of low review scores from the "professional" critics are due to them being out of touch leftists, vs them actually fearing the wrath of the left and bowing to their media clout. I suspect it's a bit of both. It's much easier for an individual to anonymously upvote than it is for them to write a positive review under their professional and public name.

To even fail to write a scathing review, is to "not be part of the solution" and not be a team player for the associated leftist agenda, and opens their career as a reviewer to cancel culture. They will quickly be targeted with the illogical leftist notion of reassigning blame. Someone will quickly say "This positive review of this deplorable comedy show is literally Nazism because it failed to stand up against it. A positive review normalizes this racist language disguised under the veil of humor, and is, therefore, MORE racist than the comedy show itself. We must boycott this reviewer and demand they be fired and dropped by their advertisers." This loud barking dog scares others into submission via path of least resistance.

I feel this crazy feedback loop is the result of PC culture. It is soooo rare to see someone publicly stand up for a statement and defend it's truth and candidness if the statement is left-illegal. Instead, passages are scanned for ideas deemed "off limits", and the entire thing is assaulted if it contains an "illegal" thought in the court of SJW-leftism.

HonkpilledMaster says

Ok, that meme is pretty damn good lol

I wanna see more of the this gillette dude haha

“I’m not for abortion,” Chappelle said. “I’m not for it but I’m not against it either. It all depends on who I get pregnant.”

“I don’t care what your religious beliefs are — if you have a dick, you need to shut the fuck up on this one,” Chappelle said. “This is theirs. The right to chose is their unequivocal right. Not only do I believe they that have a right to chose, I believe they shouldn’t have to consult anybody, except for a physician about how to exercise that right.”

“And ladies,” Chappelle added, “to be fair to us, I also believe that if you decide to have the baby a man shouldn’t have to pay. That’s fair. If you can kill this motherfucker, I can at least abandon him. My money. My choice.”

Great point!

If women have the right to KILL a baby, why are men denied the right to just have nothing to do with it?

Why should her choice obligate the man to 20 years or more of support when he has no say in it?

Sure, if a woman was stuck in a pregnancy she couldn't legally terminate, maybe she'd have the right to ask for support. But since it's entirely her choice why do men not have an equivalent right?

saw his specials. Pretty funny.

Don't like pedo jokes about Michael Jackson, or some dumb rants about Trump. But overall funny man. His suicide joke was pretty funny.

Kind of funny that he has to make like 10 apologies for every trans joke in his segment, clearly there is a protected class that even blacks are 2nd rate to lol.

www.youtube.com/embed/CImNA0re6qI

You are not racist.
You are filled with ancient ancestral guilt...

marcus says

In my view, I'm racist, but most Trump voters are more so

The definition of "baby" is at the crux of the matter...

Patrick says

If women have the right to KILL a baby

No matter how you define baby, why is it only the woman's right to abandon the pregnancy and not the man's?

Are men inferior to women in some way such that they should have lesser rights?

marcus says

In my view, I'm racist,

Sounds like something you are going to have to work on...Maybe get some professional help.

cause it's in her body. plain and simple.

Patrick says

No matter how you define baby, why is it only the woman's right to abandon the pregnancy and not the man's?

Well if the woman decides to have the baby, she should
a- Get child support if married to the absent father
b- Not get child support if not married to the father.

So it is up to both parties to decide the marital status prior to sex.

Patrick says

Are men inferior to women in some way such that they should have lesser rights?

Patrick says

No matter how you define baby, why is it only the woman's right to abandon the pregnancy and not the man's?

Are men inferior to women in some way such that they should have lesser rights?

According to liberals a woman is nothing more than a man with a mutilated penus. So I'm pretty sure they are saying that women are inferior in every way.

BlueSardine says

cause it's in her body. plain and simple.

Patrick says

No matter how you define baby, why is it only the woman's right to abandon the pregnancy and not the man's?

You can't kill your kids just because they are yours. We don't have anarchy level of freedom, although that's probably coming when faggots who adopt decide they don't want them anymore.

Patrick says

Now Will Smith will have to use the multi-hit "Stooges Slap" when he walks on stage.