5
0

EU votes in favour of giving green labels to nuclear and gas.


 invite response                
2022 Jul 25, 5:44am   471 views  9 comments

by Al_Sharpton_for_President   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

The European Parliament has decided to include nuclear energy in the EU taxonomy.

The EU Taxonomy sets the rules for what counts as an environmentally sustainable economic activity.

The delegated act, which was approved by the European Commission in February, classifies fossil gas and nuclear power as environmentally sustainable.

Environmental lawyer for the charity ClientEarth Marta Toporek said: “Today’s vote is extremely disappointing and seriously risks putting the EU’s climate goals out of reach.

“Branding fossil gas as transitional and green in the Taxonomy is unlawful as it clashes with the EU’s key climate legislation, including the European Climate Law and the Taxonomy regulation itself.

“ClientEarth, alongside other organisations, will now be looking at options to challenge the inclusion of fossil gas in the Taxonomy in court – greenwashing cannot win.”

Reacting to the vote, Sama Bilbao y León, Director General of the World Nuclear Association, said: “The European Parliament’s positive vote sends a clear endorsement of nuclear energy to the financial community.

“It has listened to the science and recognised that sustainable investment in nuclear energy will help the EU reach net zero by 2050.

“Now governments, investors and industry must act urgently and accelerate the deployment of new nuclear capacity to achieve this goal.”

https://www.energylivenews.com/2022/07/13/eu-votes-in-favour-of-giving-green-labels-to-nuclear-and-gas/

Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   HeadSet   2022 Jul 25, 8:14am  

Wonder if we will see "green" coal.
2   Tenpoundbass   2022 Jul 25, 8:20am  

Funny how all of the countries and American states hardest hit with energy crisis, are the countries and states, that virtue signaled during the Reagan administration to demonize and shut down Nuclear power energy.
Funny how after Reagan was gone, the global retards, didn't all collectively lose their shit when new Nuke plants were created. But by then the damage was already done on those Countries and States that riled against Nuclear, never gave it another thought.
Angela Merckel ordered all of Germany's Nuke plants closed now they are really having a rough go at it.

Most people would be surprised to learn that those Countries and States that swore off nuke power, and are the most vocal about doing away with fossil fuels, mostly petrol and natural gas. Get's 80% of their power from those resources. They go keep pushing until they are sitting alone in the dark without heat in the biggest bitter winter in a millennia.

Now there' some depopulation the world could use.
3   Eric Holder   2022 Jul 25, 11:05am  

HeadSet says

Wonder if we will see "green" coal.


I think it's inevitable.
4   Patrick   2022 Jul 26, 7:01pm  

https://www.ft.com/content/68bc7f20-e5f9-4532-bb0f-4820783de2c2?shareType=nongift


China ramps up coal power to boost post-lockdown growth
The need for economic stimulus is hindering efforts to cut carbon emissions...

Beijing’s emissions targets prompted local officials to curtail coal-fired power generation. But, then, last summer, China was struck by an energy shortage as economic recovery from the first phase of the pandemic and sweltering weather drove up electricity demand. Meanwhile, a price cap on electricity meant rising costs for coal and other inputs did not dampen that demand.

The energy crunch left policymakers acutely aware of the dangers of moving too quickly away from reliable but polluting coal, which still makes up about 60 per cent of China’s total electricity generation.
5   NuttBoxer   2022 Jul 26, 8:29pm  

So they're actually being honest about what's good for the environment for a change?
6   Patrick   2022 Sep 18, 5:19pm  

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/Not_the_Bee/status/1571063488860286977


1/ In the second half of the 16th century, Britain plunged into an energy crisis. At the time, the primary source of energy driving the British economy was heat derived from the burning of wood, and Britain was literally running out of trees.
2/ As the supply of wood dried up, its price began to soar and inflation set in, compounding the problem and spreading it to all corners of the economy. With imports from continental Europe insufficient to close the growing supply gap, the resulting crisis was dire.
3/ And then they discovered coal. Well, they didn’t exactly “discover” coal – it had been known for centuries that coal could be a useful fuel – but they did learn that coal could replace wood in many important applications. They also recognized that they had a lot of it.
4/ With a higher energy density than wood, coal is a superior fuel that enabled meaningful improvements in the British economy. Trees could be preserved for construction purposes, homes could be more efficiently heated, and companies could leapfrog their competitors.
5/ It is now well understood that the wide adoption of primary fuels with high energy density enables a better standard of living. Transitioning to higher density fuels is something that usually occurs spontaneously in an economy unless politicians interfere.
6/ It took little encouragement from the British government for its economy to realize the benefits of coal over wood – the inherent advantages of the material and the phenomenon of creative destruction were sufficient.
7/ In another example, the history of propulsion technology at sea is marked by a completely sensible journey up the energy density ladder. Wind power gave way to coal, which was displaced by diesel, which ultimately gave way to nuclear technology in military vessels.
8/ Given this, it might surprise our followers to learn that the European Union and Britain are incentivizing a return to the primitive concept of burning wood for energy on a massive scale.
9/ Not only are they going back to the future, but they also claim doing so is carbon neutral (spoiler alert: it isn’t, not even close). Nearly 40% of Europe’s so-called renewable energy is currently obtained by combusting wood, much of it coming from forests in the US.
10/ In a farce so perverted and obscene that it can only be the work of bloated and arrogant bureaucracies, a carbon accounting loophole is causing huge amounts of CO2 to be pumped into the atmosphere today that will take decades to abate using natural means.
11/ All across the US Southeast, massive industrial feller bunchers are cutting down and stacking mature trees with ruthless efficiency. The resulting logs are loaded onto trailers and hauled by diesel-powered trucks to wood pellet factories.
12/ Once there, the logs are milled, dried, and pressed through specialty extruders at high pressure, all of which require significant primary energy and raise local pollution issues. The resulting pellets are transported to coastal ports where they are loaded onto cargo ships.
13/ The diesel-powered cargo ships make their way across the ocean, emitting CO2 along each of their several thousands of miles traveled. Once in Europe, the pellets are burned, emitting more CO2 per unit of heat generated than any other fuel source currently used at scale.
14/ We are meant to believe THIS process is somehow carbon neutral. The loophole that enables this orgy of deforestation boils down to how and where emissions are counted. In the current framework, burning wood is zero-carbon at the point of combustion.
15/ From the perspective of Britain and the EU, the wood pellets they burn were immaculately conceived – the manner in which the pellets arrived at their power plants is not relevant to their carbon emission calculations.
16/ By burning “carbon neutral” wood pellets and decreasing their use of coal, European environmentalists get to brag to the rest of us about what wonderful stewards of this shared planet they are, all while being among its worst offenders.
17/ Further, the fact that mature trees sequester huge amounts of CO2 compared to newly planted saplings is ignored, making the premature death of that generation irrelevant to the political calculations of environmental impact.
18/ The time value of carbon emissions does not matter to the European environmental elite, despite their repeated hand wringing about how urgent the carbon crisis is, what little time we have to reduce emissions, and the devastating consequences of not acting immediately.
19/ Studies show that the burning of mature US trees absolutely overwhelms the carbon impact of all electric vehicles ever sold in the UK. All the economic sacrifices made in the name of minimizing our impact on the climate are turned into a mockery by this one insanity.
20/ To the credit of some 800 scientists from virtually all disciplines, serious efforts to reverse course have been made. In 2018, a letter was penned that accurately pointed out the environmental bankruptcy of the current biomass accounting policy. They were ignored.
21/ Back in the US, publicly traded companies like Enviva are rushing to meet Europe’s virtually insatiable demand for “carbon neutral” wood. There’s lots of happy talk about responsible forest management, good corporate citizenship, low-impact supply chains, and so on.
22/ Enviva recently announced it is expanding into Germany. On its last earnings call, the company’s CEO proudly announced the signing of the first in a series of agreements with a German utility operator
23/ Germany – a country proactively shutting down nuclear power plants despite suffering a massive energy crisis – is back to burning wood for power on an enormous scale. For the planet, of course. You could not make it up if you tried.
24/ A single pellet of uranium fuel no bigger than your fingertip provides as much energy as a ton of coal (and certainly even more wood). How many trees will be clearcut before this boondoggle of absurdity is stopped?
7   HeadSet   2022 Sep 18, 6:05pm  

Patrick says

“carbon neutral” wood.

Ha, nice take. The only “carbon neutral” wood is in my pants.
9   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2022 Nov 6, 3:05pm  

HeadSet says

Patrick says


“carbon neutral” wood.

Ha, nice take. The only “carbon neutral” wood is in my pants.


at least you didn’t call it a nuclear strike missile!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions