3
0

What a maroon.


 invite response                
2022 Oct 4, 4:34pm   7,580 views  39 comments

by Eric Holder   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

To prove their bona fides, the individual sent excerpts of three classified documents and one full classified document that were related to three unidentified US government agencies. Dalke was tied to the email account used to communicate with the FBI agent and to send the documents after investigators scouring historical user activity on NSA systems claim they found that his user account had printed all four of the classified documents.

"Dalke was the only NSA employee to have printed all of these documents," according to the affidavit.

After supplying the documents, the FBI says it sent the requested cryptocurrency to an address on August 9. That's when investigators began tracking the money.

That same day, someone opened an account under Dalke's real name on the Kraken crypto exchange and, it is alleged, after receiving the payment from the undercover agent, deposited a similar amount of the same cryptocurrency into Dalke's exchange account.

The agency claims that Dalke – a resident of Colorado Springs – converted the crypto into dollars, and withdrew the dollars ($4,559.81) from the exchange on August 9, and three days later deposited the same amount of money into a bank account in Colorado, according to the FBI affidavit.


https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/03/nsa_worker_fbi_espionage

« First        Comments 19 - 39 of 39        Search these comments

19   Patrick   2022 Oct 9, 7:10pm  

cisTits says

why is this market personal? I just asked him to answer your question.


You said:

Is it because you are just being a troll here?


That's definitely personal.
20   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 7:30pm  

Patrick says


You said:


Is it because you are just being a troll here?

That's definitely personal.



It's a legitimate question. Recall, you asked:

Patrick says


@"Eric Holder" Can you say in a few sentences why you hate Putin so much?

Ukraine is far away, and I assume you're not Ukrainian yourself.

Maybe "Because Putin invaded Ukraine and lots of people died."

But to be consistent, do you hate, say, Bush just as much for invading Iraq? Far more people died, and the excuse for invasion was far less plausible.


And he didn't answer, as I predicted.

richwicks says


@Patrick - Eric Holder is a troll or a glowie. I'll bet you $100 you don't get a reasoned thought out answer from him. I never have.


He doesn't respond. He just stirs shit up in the toilet bowl. I know you want to keep it tidy and clean, but it is the Internet.

Your rules though. I don't believe you should restrict people from sharing opinions on people's motivations - having said that, you know what my opinion is worth? Nothing.
21   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 9:05pm  

cisTits says

richwicks says



That's definitely personal.


Nope. I am just asking him a question. I haven't called him a troll or a glowing, as others have.

Your comment should be directed to @Patrick. There's a bug on this board that sometimes misattributes quotes.
22   Patrick   2022 Oct 9, 9:06pm  

cisTits says

I haven't called him a troll


Yes, when you said "you are just being a troll".
23   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 9:15pm  

Patrick says


cisTits says


I haven't called him a troll


Yes, when you said "you are just being a troll".



Do you think he's incorrect?

Where is his answer to your question? Several people have called out Eric Holder multiple times, but he's not responded in this thread. His last response on this thread was on October 4, 5:39 in this thread, here - and again, he's been directly addressed multiple times, even by you. Notice his statement that I gave in that link, was non sensical.

His last post on this board was here on October 8, 7:47 am.

He IS a troll. He's not interested in discussion at all. He's interested in provoking people, and nothing else. I doubt he even believes what he says. His name is Eric Holder, perhaps the most corrupt AG in my lifetime.

I think he's a glowie. Look at the care of his responses. I don't think he should be banned of course, but I think it's only here for disruption. Not communication. I've tried to talk to him MULTIPLE times, and there's no reasoning or sensible response. It could entirely be a computer program. I don't think it's account should be removed or wiped, it should be studied. Believe me Patrick, every group is infiltrated. It's cheap to do at this point, practically free.

Now you make construe this as personal, but I don't think what we're talking about is human, so how can that be personal?
24   Onvacation   2022 Oct 9, 9:22pm  

richwicks says

glowie

Glowie
Normally used for the CIA but also used for agencies like the ATF, FBI, etc. Their inability to blend in to the native population's habits, patterns and speech makes them stick out like a sore thumb to the population, hence they "glow in the dark."

The most common trappings of government shills are their inability/hesitation to use the major racial slurs, improper use of memes, and the pushing of mainstream political theories.

See also: Glow in the dark, glowposting
URBAN DICTIONARY
25   Onvacation   2022 Oct 9, 9:30pm  

When someone is inane I ignore them. I don't need no stinkin' ignore button.
26   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 9:30pm  

Onvacation says


The most common trappings of government shills are their inability/hesitation to use the major racial slurs, improper use of memes, and the pushing of mainstream political theories.


I stand by my assessment.

@"Eric Holder" - why should anybody not believe you're a glowie? And by the way, if you think it's some sort of badge of honor for somebody to believe you work as a propagandist for the intelligence agencies, any idiot can. It's not hard to get a job to work for garbage, if you're also garbage.

There, there's a personal statement. Let's see if there's a response. Machines don't yet have anything near human level intellect, and possibly never will. Such systems are massive to simulate it, but none of them are creative, they just regurgitate expected responses.

20 years ago, I thought all thinking was purely computational. I started to think this was incorrect about 5 years ago. We cannot make a creative machine, and we have absolutely no idea what sentience or consciousness is still. The singularity may be unobtainable at least with current assumptions.
27   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 9:34pm  

Onvacation says

When someone is inane I ignore them. I don't need no stinkin' ignore button.


Even people who habitually post stupidity, sometimes have insight. Really stupid people, are actively ignorant - they need an ignore button.
28   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 10:05pm  

cisTits says


richwicks says


@"Eric Holder" - why should anybody not believe you're a glowie?


@Patrick wtf is the above? Same thing I did. Asking a question.



Human beings can't be entirely objective. I won't object if Patrick dings me, ALSO, I won't press the issue if he does. I'll drop it and forget it, at least for a time until this pops up again.

Also, I'm purposely being a little provocative. Let's see if Eric Holder responds. My bet is he doesn't, and I expect Patrick to notice that.

I am NOT asking Patrick to do anything about it. I think Eric Holder should be studied. Propaganda is done usually with human supervision. A lot of it is done by automated scripts but with human oversight to make certain that whatever is created makes some SORT of sense. I've dealt with Hasbera and GIYUS before, it's all the same crappy software.

I'd be genuinely surprised if Eric Holder is really a person typing and thinking.

I bet Patrick just doesn't think his little blog is worth infiltrating. My experience is every place is, to varying degrees with different strategies. Certain sites are filled with anti-Semites, the KKK, clearly crazy conspiracy theories, etc - very few of them are authentic.
29   Patrick   2022 Oct 9, 10:09pm  

@cisTits

Calling someone a pile of shit is also pretty damn personal.
30   Patrick   2022 Oct 9, 10:11pm  

cisTits says

Asking a question.


You know it's a personal insult and not a good-faith question.
31   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 10:14pm  

Patrick says

cisTits says


Asking a question.


You know it's a personal insult and not a good-faith question.


To be fair, you should review what I've written as well.

I'm trying to prove something to you. Why hasn't Eric Holder responded with your honest question, which was made in good-faith?

I don't think Eric Holder, if it's a person, acts in good faith.
32   Patrick   2022 Oct 9, 10:19pm  

richwicks says


Why hasn't Eric Holder responded with your honest question, which was made in good-faith?


I don't know, but I'm not trying to insult him in any way.

You are overtly trying to insult him, posting a picture of an NPC and saying it's him, not to mention this:

He hates what he's told to hate. There's no reasoning involved.


That's 100% personal, no good will, no sincere desire to understand his point of view.
33   richwicks   2022 Oct 9, 10:31pm  

Patrick says


I don't know, but I'm not trying to insult him in any way.


I'm just saying, you're making a leap of faith to think it's a he. It very well might be an it. "He" can trivially prove it, by having a thoughtful discussion. A machine can't, a propagandist really can't - they don't know enough. They reflect opinions they are paid to project, they are not paid to think and reason.

Patrick says


You are overtly trying to insult him, posting a picture of an NPC and saying it's him, not to mention this:


He hates what he's told to hate. There's no reasoning involved.

That's 100% personal, no good will, no sincere desire to understand his point of view.



I don't see where I wrote that in my history, but I agree with it, so I probably did and you removed it, which is fine.

I don't believe it's a human being. I've tried to engage with him multiple times, and there's never any success. Either a troll or a bot or a combination. That's my conclusion.

Try to get "him" to have a discussion with you. I've done this with many people. After a point, I write them off. For example - I don't think "mostly reader" is really a real person. "He" tries to bully me into accepting his opinion, and when I ask for sources that he uses to form his, supposed, opinion, was a 300 page book written in Russian.

Everybody is infiltrated, don't sweat it.

People reflect what they read and absorb, so sometimes it's difficult to tell if I'm talking to a real person, or a bot, or a real person that is controlled by bots. That's how confusing it is today.
34   richwicks   2022 Oct 10, 7:16am  

cisTits says

richwicks says


Patrick says

cisTits says

Asking a question.

You know it's a personal insult and not a good-faith question.

To be fair, you should review what I've written as well.


Yeah. Asking if someone is a glowie isn't personal but asking them if they are a troll is?

@Patrick

??


Notice as we all argue over what Eric Holder is, Eric Holder is entirely silent.

I'm telling you, his JOB is to stir up shit in the toilet bowl.

I'm done with this thread. It's obvious to me what Eric Holder is. I mean, why would anybody name themselves after the most corrupt attorney general in the last 50 years?
35   NuttBoxer   2022 Oct 10, 9:27am  

If the minority view on the site is constantly lambasted and ridiculed, the result will be an echo chamber. Everyone has a right to their views, and not to be insulted, whether is direct, or insinuated.
36   Patrick   2022 Oct 10, 10:16am  

cisTits says

it was a good faith question


"Why are you a troll?" is about the same as "Do you still kick your mother?"
37   richwicks   2022 Oct 10, 10:44am  

Patrick says

"Do you still kick your mother?"


BTW, this question is easily addressed with the reply "I've never kicked my mother".
38   Patrick   2022 Oct 10, 11:11am  

I see it as much simpler.

Given the fact that debate ends as soon as personal insults begin, personal insults should not be allowed.

That's all there is to it.
39   Eric Holder   2022 Oct 11, 12:49pm  

richwicks says

I mean, why would anybody name themselves after the most corrupt attorney general in the last 50 years?


Bless your heart, my simple friend.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions