« First        Comments 16 - 36 of 36        Search these comments

16   HeadSet   2022 Nov 30, 7:13pm  

richwicks says


They are all bluff and bluster.

Tell that to the J6 protesters still in prison without even a charge brought up. Tell that to the hairdresser who pointed out Pelosi's hypocrisy. Tell that to even the powerful like Trump and Stone who suffered FBI raids. Tell that to the public that cannot stop forced mRNA injections or keep groomers out of schools. And despite Pharma's obvious jackpot with the plandemic, no politician has even broached the subject of a windfall profit tax on Pfizer et al.
17   richwicks   2022 Nov 30, 7:41pm  

HeadSet says

richwicks says



They are all bluff and bluster.

Tell that to the J6 protesters still in prison without even a charge brought up. Tell that to the hairdresser who pointed out Pelosi's hypocrisy. Tell that to even the powerful like Trump and Stone who suffered FBI raids. Tell that to the public that cannot stop forced mRNA injections or keep groomers out of schools. And despite Pharma's obvious jackpot with the plandemic, no politician has even broached the subject of a windfall profit tax on Pfizer et al.


IF on January 6th, there was an ACTUAL insurrection, we wouldn't have this government we do now.

Only IF though.

You may not remember the collapse of the USSR, but I do. It fell in a few days, after about 6 months of protests. That's how we will fall in time.
18   HeadSet   2022 Dec 1, 4:39pm  

richwicks says

IF on January 6th, there was an ACTUAL insurrection, we wouldn't have this government we do now.

That is my point - J6 was not an insurrection but look how many went to jail anyway. Hardly bluff and bluster when it comes to the deep state attacking anyone who opposes them.
19   richwicks   2022 Dec 1, 4:49pm  

HeadSet says


richwicks says


IF on January 6th, there was an ACTUAL insurrection, we wouldn't have this government we do now.

That is my point - J6 was not an insurrection but look how many went to jail anyway. Hardly bluff and bluster when it comes to the deep state attacking anyone who opposes them.



My point is that if the collective wants to overthrow this criminal government, it's trivial to do.

The fact that 800 people are in jail over a fake "insurrection", shows people are still too pussy to overthrow it. They'll lose pensions, they are afraid of the IRS, they are afraid of the police, they are just afraid - but if they stand up, it's gone.

But they are afraid. I can understand that. I think this government should have been put under the populace's boot and heel in 2002 when George W. Bush lied this nation into a war. What is more criminal than lying to start a war? 800,000 people died over that, and nothing was done about it and there were more crimes after that, Obozo brought back slavery to Libya, bombed Syria by LYING about chemical weapons attacks, and blew up Yemen and Somalia.

We deserve what was done to them to be done with us. You have no humanity? Got no ethics? Can't waste your time understanding what your criminal government is doing? Fine, let it be done to you. Then you'll understand. People have been warning about this sort of criminal behavior for decades. If you have to suffer to take notice, so be it.

The most fucking hard thing to do is to get people to even acknowledge what their government does, much less care about it. This is why the Internet was created, and I'm fucking pissed off people don't know or care, it's EASY to know. If you know, why don't you care?

What we are experiencing now, is a DIRECT RESULT of people being intentionally oblivious.
20   Patrick   2022 Dec 1, 4:52pm  

richwicks says

My point is that if the collective wants to overthrow this criminal government, it's trivial to do.


Vox populi, vox dei.

richwicks says

What is more criminal than lying to start a war?


Mandating the injection of billions of people with a dangerous and ineffective genetic experiment for the profit of Pfizer.

But yes, proof of the despicable corruption of the Uniparty was obvious in 2002.
21   Patrick   2022 Dec 1, 4:53pm  

richwicks says


The fact that 800 people are in jail over a fake "insurrection", shows people are still too pussy to overthrow it.


They weren't trying to overthrow anything. They were just protesting the obviously fraudulent election of 2020.

They were unarmed, pushed in by Ray Epps, allowed in by police, smiling, and taking selfies.

They didn't know they were being set up by the criminal scum at the FBI.
22   richwicks   2022 Dec 1, 5:08pm  

Patrick says


richwicks says

What is more criminal than lying to start a war?

Mandating the injection of billions of people with a dangerous and ineffective genetic experiment for the profit of Pfizer.

But yes, proof of the despicable corruption of the Uniparty was obvious in 2002.


I copied from https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=1903008 on the second paragraph to try to respond, and it fucks it up. This used to work, can you please fix that? I cannot quote multiple people without a great deal of effort.

Get an offline site so people can bitch and moan. I know you do this as a labor of love (i.e. no money) but you need a parallel site for testing. You can do this with a CGI redirect script (I think) - you use NGNIX, and I'm not really familiar with that.

Patrick says

richwicks says

What is more criminal than lying to start a war?

Mandating the injection of billions of people with a dangerous and ineffective genetic experiment for the profit of Pfizer.

But yes, proof of the despicable corruption of the Uniparty was obvious in 2002.


This is what I tried to say:

I am very frustrated.

Isn't it amazing how easily the NAZI party and the Bolsheviks were created? It's trivial.

We're both in the same area, aren't you disgusted by your colleagues? I am. I'm so fucking disgusted and I can understand the disgust the establishment has for them. I am disgusted by them as well.

-- but what is above is incorrect - the references are wrong, the quotes are wrong.
23   Patrick   2022 Dec 1, 5:38pm  

richwicks says

I copied from https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=1903008 on the second paragraph to try to respond, and it fucks it up. This used to work, can you please fix that?


I don't see what's wrong. Can you give more details about what you were trying to do?

richwicks says

aren't you disgusted by your colleagues?


I'm still in shock at how trivial it was to incite people to Nazi-level atrocities for the profits of Pfizer.

Just make them scared, and they will literally push you onto the cattle cars if that's what they are told will "save" them.

I can never again trust about half the people I know. They are proto-fascists with a thin veneer of "progressivism" in normal times. The "progressivism" itself is the big warning sign.
24   Patrick   2022 Dec 1, 5:40pm  

Patrick says

Can you give more details about what you were trying to do?


I see now. When you try to quote someone who is quoting someone else, the interior quoting is gone.
25   richwicks   2022 Dec 1, 5:47pm  

Patrick says

Patrick says


Can you give more details about what you were trying to do?


I see now. When you try to quote someone who is quoting someone else, the interior quoting is gone.

OK, just quote from where "Can you give me details...."

This used to work.

You can see it easily, but I know the nightmare of debugging I'm imposing on you.
26   richwicks   2022 Dec 1, 6:48pm  

Patrick says

I'm still in shock at how trivial it was to incite people to Nazi-level atrocities for the profits of Pfizer.

Just make them scared, and they will literally push you onto the cattle cars if that's what they are told will "save" them.


This is my shock.

I feel absolutely betrayed.

I am seeing a division of humanity I never saw before. As a child I was always in disbelief in how people could side with what I was told was the Nazi regime, or the Bolsheviks, or the Chinese communists and it's quite a shock to see how easily they are. I never realized how unprincipled people were.

I am annoyed with the Buddhist philosophy, it says "be a reed in the wind, bend" - no fuck that, break.
27   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 2, 7:25am  

Patrick says

richwicks says



Americans are ignorant that their news media is bullshit


This is why the Pfizer/government criminals are in such a panic about Twitter allowing free speech.


Allowing what now? LOL

Can I read posts by certain Kanye West there now? No? LOL again.
28   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 2, 7:36am  

Patrick says

richwicks says


My point is that if the collective wants to overthrow this criminal government, it's trivial to do.


Vox populi, vox dei.




Color revolution?
29   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 2, 7:37am  

That father talks a lot but what have he DONE? Have he at least sued? At fucking least.
30   Patrick   2022 Dec 2, 7:41am  

Pfizer kills with immunity from prosecution.

That's part of the whole criminal arrangement: you "asked" to get the death jab, so they can claim it's your fault you died.
31   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 2, 7:42am  

Patrick says

Pfizer kills with immunity from prosecution.

That's part of the whole criminal arrangement: you "asked" to get the death jab, so they can claim it's your fault you died.


Did he sue and lost or just assumed he'd lose and did nothing?
32   Patrick   2022 Dec 2, 7:45am  

RWSGFY says

Can I read posts by certain Kanye West there now? No? LOL again.


Is Kanye banned from Twitter? Ah, he is: https://twitter.com/kanyewest

This is wrong and discredits Twitter. I still want be able to hear what Kanye has to say.
33   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 2, 8:41am  

Patrick says

RWSGFY says


Can I read posts by certain Kanye West there now? No? LOL again.


Is Kanye banned from Twitter? Ah, he is: https://twitter.com/kanyewest

This is wrong and discredits Twitter. I still want be able to hear what Kanye has to say.


Kanye is banned on Twatter for being a Nazi while Amazon is still selling Mein Kampf.
34   Patrick   2022 Dec 2, 9:21am  

Maybe it wasn't for being a Nazi:

35   RWSGFY   2022 Dec 2, 9:30am  

Patrick says

Maybe it wasn't for being a Nazi:




The official reason is "Kanye is Nazi". Are you saying that he
was called that because it was convenient for pursuing the real agenda and stunning everybody into inaction? Where did I see that before.....
36   Patrick   2022 Dec 2, 2:58pm  

Patrick says

Patrick says


Can you give more details about what you were trying to do?


I see now. When you try to quote someone who is quoting someone else, the interior quoting is gone.


Shit, I can't reproduce it anymore.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions