0
0

FDA Corruption Thread


 invite response                
2023 Jan 24, 1:46pm   572 views  11 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-depopulation-industrial-complex


The Depopulation Industrial Complex: FDA Licensed Vaccines Are Not Evaluated for Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
The truth is hidden in plain sight on the FDA website





Looks like most vaccines are not evaluation for "Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility".

How then can they tell us so smugly that vaccines are "safe"?

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2023 Jan 25, 9:51pm  

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-fda-major-shift-an-annual-cull






Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015. It’s a natural broad-spectrum antiviral, antibiotic, antiparasitic, anticancer drug that is safer than aspirin. And the FDA CELEBRATED their efforts to block Americans from accessing this medicine DURING A PANDEMIC. I’m running out of words to describe the depth of the depravity of these people.
2   Patrick   2023 Jan 28, 7:17pm  

https://notthebee.com/article/the-fda-is-significantly-relaxing-its-decades-old-restrictions-against-gay-men-donating-blood


The FDA is significantly relaxing its decades-old restrictions against gay men donating blood


Get surgery, get AIDS at the same time!
3   HeadSet   2023 Jan 29, 8:40am  

Patrick says

Get surgery, get AIDS at the same time!

Or hepatitis.
5   Patrick   2023 Mar 8, 7:32pm  

https://palexander.substack.com/p/fda-imitating-its-insane-self-again


FDA imitating its INSANE self again, once again showing us why it must be stripped down to the studs by POTUS Trump, fire them all! Now FDA committee recommends Pfizer’s RSV shot despite known risks

What? Who will take this? Who in their right mind will take anything from Pfizer, drug or vaccine? Who? The people who work at and for and advise FDA are idiots, inept, stupid, mindless malfeasants

IMO, the FDA is comprised of very dangerous people. Corrupt people, reckless, illogical, specious, and clearly out of touch with the science and reality. Where is the science?

No, we want liability protection reversed and made retroactive. ...

https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-deja-vu-fda-committee-recommends-pfizers-rsv-shot-despite-known-risks-2659485387.html

“Those responsible are without remorse, so there must be a reckoning. Barring that reckoning, we promise you they will make us remorseful later for not holding them accountable now.” ~“Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting COVID Fascism with a New Nuremberg Trial, So This Never Happens Again”

Do we have to wait for two years’ worth of death and injury reports from the incoming RSV shots before we begin warning against them? Or have we learned anything from Pfizer and Moderna’s fraudulent trials on COVID?
6   Patrick   2023 Mar 12, 11:30pm  

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-march-10-2023


Pharma degrades science

Prior to Covid, the gold standard at the FDA was large, multiyear, double-blind randomized controlled trials, in humans.

First year of Covid (2020), clinical trials in humans were mid-sized (40,000) and they only lasted 6 months.

By the second year of Covid (2021), the FDA (on orders from the W.H.O.) authorized shots based on small clinical trials (just a few hundred people) for just two months (peak efficacy window).

By the end of 2021, the FDA abandoned examination of human health outcomes and started only looking at antibodies in the blood (even though by their own admission, there are no correlates of protection).

By June 2022, the FDA stopped looking at antibodies in human blood altogether and only looked at antibodies in 8 male mice.

Anyone who thinks that the FDA is still doing science (ahem, Neil deGrasse Tyson) is lying, dumb, or insane.
8   AmericanKulak   2023 Mar 13, 10:53pm  

Crazy idea: Require new drugs to pass inspection by Insurance Companies. Drug companies must pay a hefty premium the first few years of a drug is introduced. All drugs must be labelled "Insured by ... Lloyd's/Bank of Tokyo Reinsurance/etc." And to report any mal effects to the insurance company.

UL but for pharma.

Insurance companies HATE to pay out money.
9   richwicks   2023 Mar 13, 11:11pm  

AmericanKulak says

Crazy idea: Require new drugs to pass inspection by Insurance Companies. Drug companies must pay a hefty premium the first few years of a drug is introduced. All drugs must be labelled "Insured by ... Lloyd's/Bank of Tokyo Reinsurance/etc." And to report any mal effects to the insurance company.


No, they have indemnity and the courts will find in their favor anyhow. We don't have a judicial system/

Just kill the bastards. That actually will fix it.
11   Patrick   2023 May 22, 8:17pm  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/bridge-and-borises-monday-may-22?publication_id=463409&post_id=123065587&isFreemail=true


Last week, the New York Times ran a story headlined, “Oxford University Removes Sackler Name From Buildings.” The subheadline explained, “The elite British university has become the latest in a long series of institutions to publicly distance themselves from the family because of some of its members’ ties to the opioid crisis.”

The Sacklers own Purdue Pharmaceutical, maker of the safe and effective, Food and Drug Administration-approved painkiller Oxycontin. The CDC attributed half a million deaths to Oxy-related overdoses in the two decades between 1999 and 2019.

Thank goodness for big government and crack protective agencies like the FDA.

In March, a court approved a $6 billion dollar settlement with the Sackler clan — the largest such penalty to date — in exchange for a complete release from civil liability. ...

All this legal wrangling is quite fascinating, of course, and it makes the DoJ look as corrupt as everybody thinks it is, but how come nobody’s talking about the FDA, which was the captured agency that originally approved the drug? A drug that has addicted and killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, if not more? When will we start considering the FDA’s role in these epic disasters?

Good drugs can’t get approved. But criminally bad drugs get approved without a peep from regulators and wind up killing or maiming lots of people. This can’t possibly be what we originally had in mind.


So... the Sacklers killed half a million people, mostly poor whites in the center of the country, and they get complete release from civil liability and probably keep quite a lot of profits too.

You'd think that some of the relatives of the half million people the Sacklers killed might want to have a word with them.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions