patrick.net

We have a mass murder/mass injury event ongoing and bodies are piling up. The deaths and injury are the result of the forced injections of “health products” that do not comply with any regulations for pharmaceuticals nor the lists of ingredients or advertised chemical composition. Thus they should be deemed de-facto poison. Even if the manufacturers managed to produce these substances with fidelity to the label and the law, the products would be still extremely dangerous to administer on a mass scale due to numerous toxicities built into their design, which is perfectly well known to the regulators and manufacturers. Albeit, the latter got rid of employees with expertise and conscience to know this in the years immediately preceding “covid success”, and replaced them with diversity hires and software. The needles are in the hands of “nice people from healthcare” who are doing their jobs as commanded by their superiors.

That guy is right.

‘Simply Obscene’: FDA Approves Fourth COVID Shot for Infants and Kids Under 5
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s decision Tuesday to allow infants and children 6 months through age 4 to get Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot drew harsh criticism from pediatricians and others who said children don’t need any COVID-19 vaccines, let alone four doses.

FDA authorizes 4th booster for babies--while data from the UK and Germany suggest you cause 22 serious injuries with the shot in order to prevent a single child's hospitalization

We need to start charging the individual public health officials with crimes for acting outside their legal authority...

Malfeasance is an act that is illegal and causes physical or monetary harm to someone else. Malfeasance is intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful, especially by officials or public employees...

In the context of criminal law, “malfeasance” can apply to cases that cause financial damage or physical injury to another person. Malpractice is an example of criminal malfeasance."

2 Case Reports of Harms Caused by the Vaccine Mandates
The stress of persecution can be lethal by itself

An under-explored dimension of the harms inflicted via vaccine mandates is the morbidity and mortality caused by the inherent persecution levied by such mandates against those who did not wish to get vaccinated. Whereas for someone harmed or killed by a vaccine they were coerced into accepting, the link between the mandate and subsequent injury suffered is obvious, injuries caused by the economical or psychological trauma inflicted by vaccine mandates are not as readily apparent.

This does not make them any less real. For someone suffering the torment of vaccine mandate distresses - such as the stress of losing their only means of making a living, social ostracization, or the confusion and self-doubt from being relentlessly gaslit that they are crazy and irrational to have any doubts about the “safe and effective” vaccines - the pain and the burdens are often unbearable and devastating.

The following two case report studies put human faces on this dimension of evil public health policy carnage, and are worth exploring to convey a clear sense of the very tangible and violent abuse perpetrated by vaccine mandates.

Case Report #1
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection [SCAD] in the Setting of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Stressors: A Case Report
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35419243/

This case report describes a potentially life-threatening cardiac event suffered by a woman that her doctors attributed as most likely due to the stress caused by losing her job due to refusing to get vaccinated. The authors of this study do a fairly good job of fleshing out the link between the stress of unemployment and developing SCAD.

Firstly, the authors are (surprisingly) quite blunt and forthright describing the probable connection between the vaccine mandate-related unemployment and the myocardial infarction brought on by the SCAD. This is atypical for pandemic literature, where anything critical of a mainstream pandemic policy is very gently worded to avoid portraying the mainstream narrative in any sort of negative light. (That merely stating scientific information in a clear and concise manner within scientific literature is a praiseworthy revolutionary act speaks volumes about the current state of institutional science.) ...

Case Report #2
Warning: There are extremely graphic pictures of dismembered body parts in the study discussed and linked to below, including in the PubMed abstract. Follow the links at your own peril.
"Freedom and Dignity Are Worth More than Life": The Dramatic Suicide of an Anti-Vax Man
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36360482/




The second case report describes a forensic investigation of a suicide by train collision committed in order to highlight the moral travesty of vaccine mandates, that occurred in Italy, and was published in a Special Issue "Old Issues and New Challenges in Forensic and Legal Medicine". (I couldn’t find any English-language media reports of the story, which is rather odd to say the least.) ...

It is unmistakably evil to afflict millions of people with economical and emotional trauma by mandating vaccines, even if vaccination would be clearly beneficial as a purely abstract scientific matter, let alone by mandating something that confers no medical benefit and what is likely the most lethal iatrogenic intervention in history.

Nonetheless, the establishment has relentlessly demonized & dehumanized those who refused the covid vaccines. President Biden infamously threatened, “We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated — for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm.” ...

The unvaccinated (and many of those who were vaccinated) rightly perceived these as abhorrent threats. People have a vested interest in their predictions or statements being perceived as accurate, which biases them to be less than fully honest about anything that demonstrates they were wrong. This is especially pronounced for proclamations made to the public with great fanfare, and all the more so regarding an issue of enormous practical and moral consequence. ...

Next, we will go through the tipping-point where a critical mass of the population — not just in America, but throughout Western Civ, and even beyond — realizes that they have been poisoned and injured by the mRNA “vaccines” they were so eager to line up for. It will produce a special sort of collective agony centered around a raging despair that leads with astonishing speed to prosecutions. The torpor and uncertainty of the past three years evaporates and the machinery of law actually starts cranking again, and in the right way — not as a mere instrument of coercion and intimidation, but to actually seek justice.

astonishing speed to prosecutions

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

Patrick says

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

Agreed, but this is courts we are talking about. Reality is 2nd place to "saying it makes it true." Transwomen are real women, for example.

Right, reality is simply ignored lately.

There is no sane way to spin "You must take this jab or you will be fired, or expelled from school, or discharged from the military" as "No one was forced to take the jab."

You can believe that 2 + 2 = 5 if you are insane though.

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

They are still gaslighting people. Every day I see or hear ads hawking mor jabs.

OUR PURPOSE
Our purpose manifold:

First, to reveal to you, the public, the criminal organization that is seeking to coercively extort and obtain complete control over the global population. The primary instruments of the organization’s criminal conduct include the creation of patented bioweapons marketed as novel viruses and injections.

Second, to remove the protective anonymity of the criminal syndicate’s participants, including individuals, business entities, and government organizations who are pursuing a 21st century, 100-year program, called “The Century of the Vaccine.”

Finally, to expose and detail the specific crimes this organization has committed to extort commercial gain from, and raw political power over citizens of the United States of America and the world through the creation and use of bioweapons and engaging in bio-terrorism.

We all know that they released the Wuhan bioweapon right after the Trump impeachment failed.

I was as shocked as anyone. It comes much too late and the very large majority of their students and faculty complied with COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but incoming freshman and newly hired faculty will no longer be subject to this unethical and unscientific policy, and for that, we are grateful.

Stanford announced in April 2021 that students would be required to take the COVID-19 primary series prior to the fall 2021 semester. A few months later, in July 2021, we learned that the husband of a Stanford professor of law and medicine had a stroke a few days after his receiving his second COVID-19 shot, but doctors assured the family that the vaccine he took “hasn’t been associated with stroke”. When Professor Michelle Mello asked her husband’s medical team to file a VAERS report, the staff “shifted uncomfortably”, but she knew why.

Cathy Jones - National Citizens Inquiry PSA
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
Canada's National Citizens Inquiry https://www.youtube.com/@citizensinquiry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuwt00Pi25I
March 11, 2023

We lost our voice. We were censored, we were canceled, and what people had to say about their experience fell on deaf ears. That's why the National Citizens Inquiry is so important.

Make sure you take the time to hear what Canadians have endured over the last three years. The National Citizens Inquiry, NCI, a cross-country initiative wants to give those who are harmed or damaged by the government's response to the pandemic a voice and a safe space to share their experience, along with support of expert witnesses who will share their insight and knowledge to the lawyer-led hearing of testimonies.

The National Citizens Inquiry launched March 16th to 18th in Truro Nova, Scotia to register for more information see the link provided with this post. See you there!

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:

* See https://www.cbc.ca/22minutes/

What more subtle minds are asking these days is: when does this insanity tip over into evil? Especially the insanity evinced in our authority figures. How about when someone positively refutes reality in the act of doing harm, for instance Rochelle Walensky, Director of the CDC. Ms. Walensky is, to this moment, still proffering mRNA Covid-19 “vaccines” for children despite the reality that reams of evidence exist showing these products to be harmful, even deadly — and, in particular, by the previously exacting standards of the CDC’s sister agency, the FDA, which hold that just a few demonstrated injuries will lead to a drug being withdrawn from medical practice. (Ms. Walensky is a medical doctor, by the way.)

Is it possible that Ms. Walensky is unacquainted with the genuine news all over the Internet about mRNA injury and death? Rate that hard-to-believe… that is, at odds with reality. If, for some reason, it escaped her attention, do you suppose that somebody among her ten-thousand-plus CDC employees might have alerted the director about all this? I would suppose so. The unappetizing conclusion is that Rochelle Walensky, in her very important role as a national public health officer, has tripped over the line from insane to evil.

Stanford announced in April 2021 that students would be required to take the COVID-19 primary series prior to the fall 2021 semester. A few months later, in July 2021, we learned that the husband of a Stanford professor of law and medicine had a stroke a few days after his receiving his second COVID-19 shot, but doctors assured the family that the vaccine he took “hasn’t been associated with stroke”. When Professor Michelle Mello asked her husband’s medical team to file a VAERS report, the staff “shifted uncomfortably”, but she knew why.

Hmm, you think Stanford would be the last place they would run out of Soros bucks.

Sheldon Yakiwchuk
@YakkStack
When you started vaccinating children, I'd warned you that you would spend the rest of your lives looking over your shoulders and hoping to never meet with the parents of an injured child.

I was right.

Again.

Don't worry about us unvaccinated...we're not the ones you harmed. Worry about those people who you'd lied to...who you ignored when they were injured...those parents who've lost children...

These are the people you need to now be afraid of.

The rubber is meeting the road...chickens coming home to roost...

I do not condone violence, vengeance nor vigilantism...and will be watching this from the sidelines...and all I have to left to say about this is...

You were warned.

Don't worry about us unvaccinated...we're not the ones you harmed. Worry about those people who you'd lied to...who you ignored when they were injured...those parents who've lost children..

Patrick says

Don't worry about us unvaccinated...we're not the ones you harmed. Worry about those people who you'd lied to...who you ignored when they were injured...those parents who've lost children..

I would be very surprised to see any retaliation by parents of vaxxed injured kids, as the parents would have to admit they sacrificed their kid on the alter of politics. Maybe if they could sue and win, however.

Not widely reported was the news that the FDA recently removed approval for the original shots.

the FDA is raising the white flag on the mRNA Covid shots.
Unvaccinated adults will no longer be offered more than a single mRNA dose. (Tell that to the 230 million Americans who already took two.) And almost no one under 65 is eligible for a second booster.