patrick.net

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2023/02/24/californias-councilmans-massive-mail-in-ballot-vote-scam-is-revealed-n1673382

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/if-i-were-a-globalist-overlord-looking/comment/13119176

Anna Karenina
5 hr ago
Liked by Meryl Nass
How can you possibly think voting will fix issues? The 2 opposing camps are given to the peasants to keep them HOPING that once their chosen candidate gets elected things will be different. While they are HOPING they are not ACTING. Both sides are owned. The steady deterioration of rights and the growth of the State has been evident no matter which camp is in power. This is where voting led us. It is madness to believe that voting will get us out. Not to mention that if the Constitution has any power how can any administration bypass it and do unconstitutional things?? Where are the Justices stating “this is unconstitutional and cannot be done!” Where are the much touted “checks and balances”??? It is madness to think that doing the same think will yield different results.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/02/27/why-isnt-he-being-prosecuted-trump-goes-after-zuckerberg-over-2-million-donation-to-ga-election-board-1336087/

‘Why isn’t he being prosecuted?’ Trump goes after Zuckerberg over $2 million donation to GA election board

Former President Donald J, Trump called for the prosecution of Mark Zuckerberg over a report that a group connected to the Facebook/Meta CEO gave $2 million to a Georgia elections board, a donation that may have violated state law.

“‘Why isn’t he being prosecuted?” Trump lashed out after Fox News Digital reported that a watchdog group is calling for an investigation into the “flagrant and egregious” violation of a Georgia state ban on private funding by the DeKalb County Board of Registration and Elections, a prohibition that was put into place after accusations that left-wing donors had exerted influence over the 2020 elections.

“He cheated on the Election(s). The whole system is RIGGED. Why isn’t he being prosecuted? The Democrats only know how to cheat. America isn’t going to take it much longer!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social along with a link to the Fox News report.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/02/the_solution_to_ballot_fraud.html

The Immovable Object is visibility of electoral data for any citizen from his phone — cross searched against property tax records — and dozens of other databases — at silicon speed.

When citizens, of any party, realize that their county registrar has voters living in banks, 7-Elevens, public parks, and their own homes — to their surprise — they experience what disenfranchisement means.

Visibility to evil drives social change.

It's our turn!

https://babylonbee.com/news/white-house-announces-all-conspiracy-theories-are-true-except-for-the-one-about-biden-stealing-the-presidency

cisTits says

^^^^ In Maine and Alaska, the only solution now is for the state party to conduct their own, private process (which is how it should be) to pre-select candidates to run in the official RCV corrupt primary.

The Dems only want RCV in certain states. Won't see this in California, for example.

Ranked choice voting is not what you think it is. The problem is everybody picks the LEAST likely candidate to win in the first round, and you pick "more establishment" candidates later, so you always end up with an establishment candidate. It's actually designed to prevent non establishment candidates from gaining power.

https://patriots.win/p/16aTLuOxST/the-real-insurrection-occurred-i/c/

https://slaynews.com/news/kayleigh-mcenany-puts-joe-biden-on-notice-he-was-able-to-sleep-his-way-through-the-2020-campaign-he-cannot-do-that-this-time/

Kayleigh McEnany: Biden Won’t Be ‘Able to Sleep His Way Through’ a 2024 Campaign as He Did in 2020

Yes he will. We have no democracy. We have open fraud in presidential elections now.

Biden could literally die right now and still be "elected" by yet another massive election fraud in 2024.

American democracy is over, done, ended. All we have is rule by Pfizer and the FBI with support from brain dead woketards who watch corporate news on TV.

Hunh! Maybe I AM too cynical..

https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1638745402748080130?ref_src=patrick.net

richwicks says

Hunh! Maybe I AM too cynical..

I dunno. Let's see what actually becomes of this.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

Hunh! Maybe I AM too cynical..

I dunno. Let's see what actually becomes of this.

Oh, I expect nothing will come of it. I'm just surprised a any court gave her a small win.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz probably wasn't elected in 2016, Tim Canova did. Benda Snipes the election supervisor illegally destroyed ballots, you know what happened to Snipes? Nothing. She resigned, but not because of that. Why should ballots EVER be destroyed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brenda_Snipes#2016_elections

On September 1, 2017, while litigation was ongoing, Snipes signed an order authorizing the destruction of 688 boxes containing the ballots. Litigation on the matter continued for another two weeks. On November 6, 2017, the court discovered that the ballots in question had been destroyed two months prior. The judge ruled that Snipes had illegally destroyed the ballots and that Canova be awarded attorney's fees. Snipes' attorney said a vendor had made and retained a digital copy of every ballot cast in the race and that the destruction of the ballots was neither intentional nor illegal.

Our election system is a joke. It's just so fucking obvious - why would Snipes order the ballots destroyed when there was ongoing litigation? Only one reason, an inspection of the ballots would have demonstrated fraud.

I bet the same thing happens in Arizona - they'll destroy the evidence and then say "oops! My bad!" and nobody will go to jail. Until the population gets fed up with not having elections and does something VIOLENT at this point, it's not going to change. That happened 6 years ago, and Schultz JUST resigned for having rigged the primaries for Hillary Clinton. Seriously, if ANYBODY else was run against Trump, and I mean anybody, Trump would have never been president.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/breaking-shasta-county-california-county-supervisors-vote-to-go-with-paper-ballots/

Just one county, but it's a start.

Patrick says

Just one county, but it's a start.

Yes! It is a start and it is what we need across the USA...

From the link: "The County Supervisors in Shasta County, California, voted last night to go with paper ballots in elections going forward. The vote was 3-2."

The_Deplorable

https://slaynews.com/news/recent-cases-voter-fraud-prove-importance-election-integrity/

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2019/12/12/jerry-nadler-just-said-we-cant-trust-an-election-to-get-rid-of-president-trump-n2557874

Jerry Nadler Just Said We Can't 'Trust an Election' to Get Rid of President Trump
Katie Pavlich

December 12, 2019

During debate on articles of impeachment in the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday night, Chairman Jerry Nadler undermined the vote of millions of Americans and said they can't be trusted to decide who should win the White House in 2020.

"We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems when the president threatens the very integrity of that election," Nadler said during his opening statement. "Nor can we sit on our hands while the President undermines our national security—and while he allows his personal interests and the interests of our adversary Russia to advance."

(paywall)

From 2019, but sounds to me like an advance confession that Nadler participated in the massive, unmistakable election fraud in 2020.

https://patriots.win/p/16ami85mls/my-county-recently-banned-domini/

My county recently voted to remove Dominion machines. A lot of normies became extremely upset about this, but they're unable to articulate why they're so upset. It's a lot like that time when people claimed CRT wasn't being taught, but then tossed their tendies when it was banned.

The argument that voting machines are rigged, or owned by groups with political ties isn't going to get you anywhere because it's complicated to explain, and easy to write off as a paranoid conspiracy theory.

A good way to approach the voting machine debate is by asking someone if they understand the concept of decentralization, and when and where it's used. If they have a clear understanding of decentralization, then ask them how they would feel about their county's votes being counted by one person- They don't know this person, nor the political connections this person may have, or if this person is compromised.

Many would agree that putting trust into one person to count all the votes is a gamble and could lead to problems. Instead, you would want to have several people counting, from both sides, so everyone can cross-check everyone else's work, thus making cheating a lot more challenging.

A small county only needs one or two machines to count all of their ballots. But with a machine you've effectively centralized the counting to one closed-source entity. This machine is no different from that single unknown person counting behind closed doors.

Patrick says

Many would agree that putting trust into one person to count all the votes is a gamble and could lead to problems. Instead, you would want to have several people counting, from both sides, so everyone can cross-check everyone else's work, thus making cheating a lot more challenging.

You are assuming the Dems do not want cheating. The Dems want the machine counting in place precisely because it is a way to cheat for their side. The Dems actually believe that the public is too stupid to elect the proper people, so the ends justify the means. Top level Dems just want to preserve the grift.

They're will be a zero sum game where if there are even two sides at all, they will both cheat to infinity until by default things will have to collapse back to a system of accountability, or the election process will become pure apparatchik installation and we will veer toward civil war. The psychopaths think their Babylonian fall backs work best that way, anyway.

https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2023/04/10/47-million-in-small-amounts-of-money-donated-to-democrats-apparently-without-the-donors-knowledge-n2621731

$4.7 Million in Small Amounts of Money Donated to Democrats – Apparently Without the Donors’ Knowledge

Patrick says

Hawaii

https://babylonbee.com/news/jury-votes-in-favor-of-dominion-1380000-to-1

WILMINGTON, DE — In a stunning result that came much more quickly than observers expected, the 12-member jury in the Fox News-Dominion Software trial has voted in favor of Dominion by a count of 138,000 to 1.

"This was a complete reversal of the way things looked just last night," legal analyst Alan Dershowitz said when word of the ruling began to come out. "It seemed like the decision would end up being much closer, but at some indiscernible point, a massive number of jury members flocked to Dominion's side of the argument. A total landslide decision!"

The court reportedly had only recently decided to switch to a new electronic jury vote tabulation system, though this switch is said to have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the overwhelming decision in Dominion Software's favor. "Apples and oranges," said a courtroom insider with knowledge of the choice to use electronic jury voting. "The fact that we went with electronic vote counting and the lopsided result are entirely unrelated, and any speculation otherwise is just a ridiculously far-fetched, crackpot conspiracy theory. There's also nothing worth investigating regarding the fact that there are only 12 jury members, yet there were over 138,000 jury votes received. It's normal. Nothing weird about it. Move on, you crazy conspiracy theorists!"

At publishing time, Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg was rumored to already be reaching out to the Delaware court to find out more information about the electronic jury vote tabulation for potential use in an upcoming New York case.

https://twitter.com/thatdayin1992/status/1649763435054510081?ref_src=patrick.net

https://slaynews.com/news/americans-believe-cheating-impacted-recent-elections-poll-shows/

60% of Americans Believe ‘Cheating’ Impacted Recent Elections, Poll Shows

Only 60%?

i would never answer a poll, since polls are forms of surveillance and the 'trust us' bit that they will keep information and identities confidential is bogus. Also, people have a tendency to answer the way they think the questioners want rather than the way they really think or feel, to protect themselves, so 60 percent is huge.