by Y ➕follow (4) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 82 of 82 Search these comments
on edit:
strike "libby neocons"
substitute: "NeoLibbys"
Conservatism cannot fail
Conservatism can only be failed
If a conservative policy fails it, was not really conservative
If a conservative fails, he was not a true conservative
The greater good ...
The greater good ...
I think you are confusing the jist of the thread.
It is not to promote democracy worldwide, nor to reform worldwide markets.
It is to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons in an area of the world where the majority of the population function with skillsets of 16th century slaves beholden to their warmongering gods.
The metallic neocon braying
Neoliberalism/Neoconservatism has nothing to do with it.
You are making the common error here of associating any kind of military action with "Neo".....
in an area of the world where the majority of the population function with skillsets of 16th century slaves beholden to their warmongering gods
You need to be more specific: Mississippi, or Tennessee?
"NeoIamRighties"...
There, I am fair and balanced....
substitute: "NeoLibbys"
Conservatism cannot fail
Neoliberalism/Neoconservatism has nothing to do with it.
Even though you tried to argue that above.
Got it.
which post?
Neoliberalism/Neoconservatism has nothing to do with it.
Even though you tried to argue that above.
Got it.
"Threaten" to nuke medina/mecca.
This would be the first option in my book.
See how that pans out.
That will pan out even better than attacking iran. The suadi's will be so thrilled we threatened to nuke two of their cities that they will send us oil free I'm sure. My stomach is starting to hurt from laughing. You've got to cut this out.
Why are you throwing softballs??
4 Neocon Rags and 1 Neolib mouthpiece Court Historian Codex.
Old Gray Baglady piece is about an Israeli Airstrike killing an Iranian General in Syria.
Not convinced.
I could see that happening...they are religious freaks also...
Glad you pointed out that side benefit...
The suadi's will be so thrilled we threatened to nuke two of their cities that they will send us oil free I'm sure.
I could see that happening...they are religious freaks also...
Glad you pointed out that side benefit...
The suadi's will be so thrilled we threatened to nuke two of their cities that they will send us oil free I'm sure.
I'm beginning to suspect that you don't realize mecca and medina are saudi cities. Otherwise this makes less than zero sense.
I realize that.
The importance of Mecca for Muslims is inestimable. All Muslims , wherever they are on Earth, pray 5 times a day in the direction of the Kaaba in Mecca.
1.6 billion+ Muslims all over the world, including saudi arabia, would do whatever it took to protect this revered site. No Kaaba, no place to aim yourself in prayer...
Only Muslims can eradicate the radicals. They are the only ones that can get close and identify the troublemakers. But they have only made barely detectable minimal effort. They are not motivated. Yet the radicals are motivated to control the world and we are paying the price for that.
It's time to motivate them, or be assimilated.
I'm beginning to suspect that you don't realize mecca and medina are saudi cities. Otherwise this makes less than zero sense.
The importance of Mecca for Muslims is inestimable.
Imagine what a Tee Shirt concession would bring in.
One could fund monthly wet burka contests...
The importance of Mecca for Muslims is inestimable.
Imagine what a Tee Shirt concession would bring in.
1.6 billion+ Muslims all over the world, including saudi arabia, would do whatever it took to protect this revered site. No Kaaba, no place to aim yourself in prayer...
Only Muslims can eradicate the radicals. They are the only ones that can get close and identify the troublemakers. But they have only made barely detectable minimal effort. They are not motivated. Yet the radicals are motivated to control the world and we are paying the price for that.
It's time to motivate them, or be assimilated.
The neocon brain in action. Hand over the radicals or we'll nuke medina and mecca. That's your plan? Perfect, you can't make this shit up. Do you mind if I share this, it's too precious to not be shared with others. Everyone deserves a good laugh today.
I'm neither "neo" or "conservative", but you already knew that...
(strike 1)
The neocon brain in action.
But I just did...and you already knew that!
(strike 2)
bob2356 says
Hand over the radicals or we'll nuke medina and mecca. That's your plan? Perfect, you can't make this shit up.
I posted on a public admission free forum. It is already 'shared'...but you already knew that..
(strike 3, have a seat..)
Do you mind if I share this, it's too precious to not be shared with others.
I'm neither "neo" or "conservative", but you already knew that...
It's dead certain that you were a strident supporter of the Iraq War in 2003.
Wrong again...
I was actually apolitical back then. I supported the troops but did not give much indepth research into their mission...just Go USA...whatever..
I'm neither "neo" or "conservative", but you already knew that...
It's dead certain that you were a strident supporter of the Iraq War in 2003.
I'm neither "neo" or "conservative", but you already knew that...
(strike 1)The neocon brain in action.
If it flys like a duck, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck.
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 82 of 82 Search these comments
but not for the reasons he gives..
D-dayII: June 30, 2015
It is fitting and proper–indeed essential for our very security–that Speaker John Boehner has extended an invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu to address Congress on Iran and its efforts to develop nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them anywhere in the world. The invitation has bipartisan support because many members on both sides of the aisle recognize the fundamental threat to world peace that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose. Like Winston Churchill in the 1930s with Nazi Germany, Netanyahu has been sounding the alarm about Iran’s ominous nuclear and terrorist activities.
The President has made clear his intense dislike of Israel’s prime minister and his refusal to keep quiet about Obama’s desire to conclude a Neville Chamberlain-like deal with Teheran.
The mullahs agreed to sit down with the US and Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany to come up with an agreement ostensibly to get Iran to back off its nuclear ambitions. Iran’s agenda was simple: get the sanctions eased, and then with a loophole-ridden treaty, get them removed altogether.
Appeasers argue that containment will work with a nuclear-armed Iran just as it did with the old Soviet Union during the Cold War and thus there is nothing to really worry about. Israel and other Mideast nations know better.
The Iranian government, despite the immense corruption of many of its leaders, is a revolutionary regime. Its actions over the years demonstrate that the rhetoric of its officials is more than just hot air. Iran is terror central. It bankrolls and provides arms to Hamas, Hezbollah and all sorts of Islamic terrorists organizations.
If the US tacitly concedes its resignation to Iran becoming a nuclear power, then other countries will follow suite in creating their own nukes, including Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
With nukes in so many unstable hands, a disaster is almost a certainty. Moreover, the widespread knowledge of how to make the Bomb will certainly fall into terrorist hands, which is why the US must prevent this nuclear proliferation in the first place.
Ominously Iran has apparently developed an intercontinental ballistic missile that can reach not only Israel but also Europe. It won’t be many years before the mullahs can aim nuclear tipped missiles against the US. No surprise, the current negotiations don’t cover Iranian missile development.
Obama has trampled on the Constitution time and again–making laws and changing laws at will–and wants no Congressional involvement precisely because the resultant debate would glaringly show what a dangerously miserable deal he had cut. The ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Menendez, recently declared: “The more I hear from the Administration and its quotes, the more it sounds like talking points that come straight out of Teheran.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2015/01/28/why-netanyahu-the-churchill-of-our-time-must-speak-before-congress/
#politics