« First « Previous Comments 28 - 67 of 87 Next » Last » Search these comments
Clean the wax out of your ears, at around 2:15 he specifically answers the CNN claim that he DOES NOT endorse Trump, but he agrees with some of his positions and he would consider voting for him in the future. Why do you continue to lie?
Nobody said he "endorsed" him. Duke clearly says he thinks everyone should vote for Trump and that he will vote for Trump. That is the definition of supporting. You're the only idiot lying here.
So, now your up to 13 out of at least 515... That's still leaves him at a 97.5% success rate... How's YOUR success rate with YOUR businesses?
Those are just the 13 most ridiculous ones. Why don't you list all 515 businesses and we'll see how many survived?
Thanks for supplying the proof of your assertion... Oh wait, you didn't....
It was in the video that I already posted. Next time you might want to watch something before commenting on it.
Either way, im surprised you allowed your lady to vote Rubio.
She said she wanted to vote against Trump. I told her if she just wants a protest vote she could vote for Kasich, but if she wants to hurt Trump the most, vote Rubio, and that is what she did. When she left, she said it felt weird. I asked if it was because she just voted for a Catholic Cuban homosexual conservanut. She said it was weird just to vote for a Republican. I was happy that between the two of us, we voted for Bernie and against Trump. If we had a big difference of opinion, I wouldn't bother trying to influence her vote and know it wouldn't work, anyway.
Bill Gates' Energy Project, of whom he is the largest owner, went bust. Therefore, Bill Gates is a failure, loser, and not a "real" Businessman.
I'm voting for somebody fired from the Watergate Investigation for being "dishonest and unethical" by her Democrat Boss.
Come on Thunder--you're better than sinking to CIC's level. Trump's supporters are the ones that are claiming he is fit to be President because he is/was such a successful businessman. You don't think it's fair game to examine whether he really was successful or not?
For God's Sake the Clintons accused Bernie Supporters of being Misogynists.
http://redalertpolitics.com/2016/01/17/feminists-blame-berniebros-sexism-hillarys-bad-polls/
Will Hillary disavow Amanda Marcotte, a noted misandrist with a pattern of supporting false rape accusations?
You're right... You're now reaching back to 1990 (25 years ago) to dig up dirt.... I think that's called "desperate".
I think you need to find some quotes of his back in college, that will surely help!!
Wow--I'm sure you thought the same when posting about domestic terrorist William Ayers 8 years ago, right?
filing strategic bankruptcy to rid oneself of bad debt is what free market capitalism is all about!
Do you know what the word "endorse" means?
Do you know what the word "support" means? Because that is the word that is used.
he is/was such a successful businessman. You don't think it's fair game to examine whether he really was successful or not?
So, now your up to 13 out of at least 515... That's still leaves him at a 97.5% success rate... How's YOUR success rate with YOUR businesses?
Tatty, is a 97.5% success rate good or bad?
Great--why don't you post the other 502 businesses that Trump is running that are successful and still operating.
Hillary, disavow Amanda Marcotte and Bernie Bros smear! Be a uniter and fight against misandry!
Really, at 2:26 in my video above, Duke says "support"?
You need to get to a ear doctor.... STAT!!!
No you moron. That's the word that I used that you called a lie. Try to follow if you can.
And I'd say going on a video telling people that they should vote for Trump, followed by Duke, himself, saying he will vote for Trump is--pretty much the definition of "support"
Good comeback.
Regardless. Talk about Duke splitting hairs. He doesn't endorse Trump, but he is on record saying he will vote for him. And he thinks you should vote for him too.
but he is on record saying he will vote for him
What's your point? You're going to base your vote on whether people you (don't) like are voting for a candidate? This is a fucking election, not social media.
Finally.... took you long enough...
He said he supports some of his POSITIONS.... that's a bit of a stretch to say he totally supports Trump... but hey, stretching and splitting "talking points" is your specialty, since that's all you got...
Did you get through that list of Trump's businesses yet, you didn't answer my question:
No-he says he WILL vote for Trump and asks everyone watching the video to vote for him too. There is no sane person who would say Duke doesn't support Trump.
What's your point? You're going to base your vote on whether people you (don't) like are voting for a candidate? This is a fucking election, not social media.
Read the rest of the thread--you clearly are coming in guns drawn without knowing what the fuck you are responding to.
OK--here is Duke's statement.
"I do support his candidacy, and I support voting for him as a strategic action. I hope he does everything we hope he will do,†Duke, who also served a three-year stint in the Louisiana state House, said Wednesday.
"And I am telling you that it is your job now to get active. Get off your duff. Get off your rear end that’s getting fatter and fatter for many of you everyday on your chairs,†Duke implored his racist listeners. “When this show’s over, go out, call the Republican Party, but call Donald Trump’s headquarters, volunteer.â€
“They’re screaming for volunteers. Go in there, you’re going to meet people who are going to have the same kind of mindset that you have,†Duke said."
Are you still going to argue that Duke doesn't support Trump?
Are you still going to argue that Duke doesn't support Trump?
Are we still arguing that Trump didn't disavow Duke multiple times?
By Sunday, Trump was already asked repeatedly and was probably tired of it, because it is a political smear, plain and simple. Tatupu, you of all people should see this for the naked smear (and attempt at publicity for professional controversialist David Duke) for what it is.
Are we still arguing that Trump didn't disavow Duke multiple times?
By Sunday, Trump was already asked repeatedly and was probably tired of it, because it is a political smear, plain and simple. Tatupu, you of all people should see this for the naked smear (and attempt at publicity for professional controversialist David Duke) for what it is.
I don't. If he had simply disavowed when asked initially, it's a non-story. But he first lied saying he didn't know who Duke was-when, as you showed earlier, he disavowed Duke less than a year earlier. And, even if he hadn't--do we want someone to be President that doesn't know who David Duke is?
Trump caused this because he was playing politics as socal2 said. He needs the racist vote on Super Tuesday so he didn't want to come out against Duke initially.
You're right... You're now reaching back to 1990 (25 years ago) to dig up dirt.... I think that's called "desperate".
Dude - Trump still praises Putin today for being a "big strong leader". And who in their right fucking mind would praise China 25 years ago for slaughtering Democracy advocates at Tienanmen square? Who in their right fucking mind would criticize Gorbachev for opening up Communist Russia to reforms?
Trump is an authoritarian through and through.
There is so much dirt on this New York Liberal scumbag that the Democrats and Media are sitting on and they are hoping and praying that the retarded segment of the Republican party are dumb enough to nominate Trump.
Trump is the ONLY Republican that will lose to Hillary.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
If he had simply disavowed when asked initially, it's a non-story.
He did on Friday in no uncertain terms. CNN asked him AGAIN on Sunday, where he disavowed Duke. And all weekend long on Social Media, clearly over and over again.
Again, the smear doesn't matter, it just needs to be repeated over and over again.
He did on Friday in no uncertain terms. CNN asked him AGAIN on Sunday, where he disavowed Duke. And all weekend long on Social Media, clearly over and over again.
Again, the smear doesn't matter, it just needs to be repeated over and over again.
So why did he say he didn't know who Duke was then?
Trump supporters have almost as thin a skin as he does. Oh--look at the injustice. People are saying bad things about Trump. Boo-hoo. Not every attack is a smear. All Trump does is attack--you think the nonsense about Rubio sweating is fair?
PS--A bad earpiece? Really?
He is giving legitimacy to racists and encouraging people with minor racist tendencies to cultivate that part of their personalities.
Nope. Being against immigration is not the same as having minor racist tendencies.
Fuck this amalgam.
I cant wait for tatupu to put this much energy into airing out Clintons hate of blacks.
BRING THEM TO HEEL!
I cant wait for tatupu to put this much energy into airing out Clintons hate of blacks.
BRING THEM TO HEEL!
lol--you don't see the same hero-worship out of Clinton supporters. It's not as fun.
Trump, however, did not take that opportunity. Instead, the real estate mogul, apparently so fearful of alienating even the worse elements of the electorate whose votes he wants, described men who beat a Hispanic Boston man as "passionate."
Nope. Being against immigration is not the same as having minor racist tendencies.
Fuck this amalgam.
Do you think telling a lie over and over makes it true? Don't you think the other Repubs and the RNC would have served up all the dirt they had before today? After tonight, the nomination will be Trump's.
Yep, if there was all this shit out there, GOPe would have used some of it against Trump already. He's not so stupid not to have thoroughly investigated himself first and find out what investigators and muckrackers can come up with. He's already lived 30+ years in public eye, a Tabloid regular. Anything bad would have come out.
That's why they are grasping at straws like Duke.
So why did he say he didn't know who Duke was then?
On Sunday. He already told CNN in no uncertain terms on Friday. Why does CNN keep asking the same question?
Because merely asking the question is a repeat of the smear, and you ask again and again and again, hoping the recipient makes a snarky or less-than-100% clear response.
Which is exactly what happened here.
He already told CNN in no uncertain terms on Friday. Why does CNN keep asking the same question?
They wanted to give him another opportunity to emphatically disavow Duke. Instead, the Donald choked on the softball.
On Sunday. He already told CNN in no uncertain terms on Friday. Why does CNN keep asking the same question?
Because merely asking the question is a repeat of the smear, and you ask again and again and again, hoping the recipient makes a snarky or less-than-100% clear response.
Which is exactly what happened here.
Come on--first of all, it wasn't on CNN on Friday. It was at the Christie endorsement when someone asked him and he quickly brushed the question aside. If anything, CNN was giving him the opportunity to publicly denounce/disavow on a national forum. It was a gift to Trump.
It was anything but a smear. It only became a smear when Trump decided to lie about not knowing Duke.
Who the fuck is david duke and why should anyone care?
Im more concerned about Hilary forcibly removing the young black woman who paid to be at her event, and asked for apology for MAKE THEM HEEL
He's already lived 30+ years in public eye, a Tabloid regular. Anything bad would have come out.
That's exactly it. A bunch of bullshit twits and lamestream-media "news" are more opinion-forming than a man's lifetime these days. I hope Trump cleans up tonight.
Do you think telling a lie over and over makes it true? Don't you think the other Repubs and the RNC would have served up all the dirt they had before today?
Facts are hard for Trump-bots.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/20/super-pacs-have-spent-more-than-215-million-on-the-presidential-race-guess-how-much-has-gone-into-ads-opposing-trump/Ironman says
Trump isn't a Republican.
I know - he is a Liberal Fascist. Why do you think Thundercommie is so excited about him?
Would you consider Obama a racist?
No.
Who the fuck is david duke and why should anyone care?
How old are you? Anyone over 40 who hasn't been living under a rock would have to know who he is. He's the most famous member of the KKK, probably because of his efforts to run for President in the late 80s / early nineties. He's apparently more for the white supremacy side of things than the violence, and wanted to bring new legitimacy to the pro-white movement. Anyway, he's pretty much synonymous with the KKK in my mind. Trump either knows very well who Duke is, or he is senile.
Oh please.... have you seen any video clips the last week or two. All Rubio and Cruz have done in ALL their rallies, media interviews and townhalls is spew their endless talking points about Trump. Have you watched the last couple of debates, it's been all attacks on Trump...
Earth to Irontrumpbot - the last 7 days doesn't equal hundreds of millions in attack ads that have been spent on the other candidates over the last several months.
The dumb GOPe and other candidates thought Trump would implode all by himself, so they spent next to nothing attacking Trump. They underestimated how much Trump resonates with Democrats and Nationalists.
They wanted to give him another opportunity to emphatically disavow Duke. Instead, the Donald choked on the softball.
Not another opportunity, unless it was use repeating the question as a means of repeating the smear, as I discussed. Trump already on Friday disavowed Duke clearly and succinctly.
Either CNN is deaf or they wanted to repeat the smear.
They underestimated how much Trump resonates with Democrats and Nationalists.
There's a disturbing number of people in america on both sides of political spectrum who are willing to live under dictatorship. They don't care that it will be worse than it is today, they are simply upset either because of their economic problems or because they are simply bored and want to tear down society as we know it. They are a perfect bait for nefarious characters to exploit.
You guys are so full of shit. If Trump was a dictator, wouldn't some of his 22,000 employees have come forward to express how big of a dictator he is? If he is really this bad, there should be THOUSANDS of former employees coming forward.
Just how much shit can you pull out of your asses?
They all say the exact opposite - that he's tough, fair, and very loyal to his employees.
There's a disturbing number of people in america on both sides of political spectrum who are willing to live under dictatorship. They don't care that it will be worse than it is today, they are simply upset either because of their economic problems or because they are simply bored and want to tear down society as we know it. They are a perfect bait for nefarious characters to exploit.
Blah Blah Blah, Media and Political Hacks said the same shit about Reagan, FDR, Obama-Commie, Nixon, etc. etc. Cut the crap.
Obama-Commie
He wanted to bring people together, but the usual suspects didn't want any part of it and protested from day 1. When did he say hitleresque divisive comments that propelled him to the top of his party polls like you know who?
"Let's not vote for Trump: he is a liar, we don't know what he stands for."
www.youtube.com/embed/-dY77j6uBHI
You just know that Hitlery has a fierce ache in her snatch that can only be sated with the circumcised bits of millions of young Muslim men she plans to import once she is POTUS.
He wanted to bring people together, but the usual suspects didn't want any part of it and protested from day 1. When did he say hitleresque divisive comments that propelled him to the top of his party polls like you know who?
I didn't say Obama WAS a Commie, I was stating that pundits always call the nominee or candidate they despise a closet Dictator just waiting for the chance to rule with ze Iron Pfist fur zie benefit auf der Mittengrabben, Vingerpokken allies.
« First « Previous Comments 28 - 67 of 87 Next » Last » Search these comments
www.youtube.com/embed/DnpO_RTSNmQ