« First « Previous Comments 62 - 101 of 120 Next » Last » Search these comments
CNN is not trustworthy.
Hiring actors to protest or support a cause is an old and often used tactic. Why do you hate capitalism? Money is speech, so as long as CNN paid these actors, their protest was real like the free speech rights of corporations. Long live Citizen's United.
getting serious about deporting every Muslim even distantly related to any of these losers
How distant? Second cousins, third generation US citizens OK? Where will you deport them to?
These losers are delusional enough to think that they are not losers
I was poking through some of the Musa Jibril videos on YouTube, and saw links to videos entitled "we are not weak" and similar themes. The denial tells you something. The fear that they are indeed weak losers who have nothing but terrorism is indeed in their minds.
What they need is an alternative which gives them meaning and self-respect outside of Islam. What is that exactly? Christianity works for some. Capitalism is probably not it. Humanism is too abstract. Their families are all infected with the virus of Islam, which makes them want to re-infect or kill anyone who manages to cure themselves.
I almost feel sorry for Muslims. Their minds are trapped in the year 650 AD.
How distant? Second cousins, third generation US citizens OK? Where will you deport them to?
Most of them have dual citizenship. Also, a few thousand in the right palms and they'll take them in. It's much cheaper in terms of lives and multiwife welfare.
Most of them have dual citizenship. Also, a few thousand in the right palms and they'll take them in. It's much cheaper in terms of lives and multiwife welfare.
But they are still US citizens (third generation in my example). Or perhaps we can take an example from Stalin and send them to Alaska (like he was moving whole peoples to Siberia). Or why bother deporting, just do like the Nazis - 100 Poles for every German.
What they need is an alternative which gives them meaning and self-respect outside of Islam.
The best alternative is opposing Islam. Promoting blasphemy everywhere could make a huge difference for this reason among others. The best sites criticizing Islam tend to be written by people who grew up with that hateful fraud, because they can literally cite chapter and verse from memory. The problem is we're not even trying to help people get out from under the dead charlatan Mohamed. To the contrary, our own government is empowering and spreading arguably the worst form of his fraud, Salafi/Wahabi.
America confronted communism and the Nazism, but has chosen to monetize and weaponize Islam instead of denouncing it.
It's a good day to be conservative!
I find it odd that Islamic Conservatives and Christian Conservatives both have the same reaction after a terror attack.
I wonder if they ask themselves why they have the same reaction to such a heinous act. Probably because they are very similar
But they are still US citizens (third generation in my example). Or perhaps we can take an example from Stalin and send them to Alaska (like he was moving whole peoples to Siberia). Or why bother deporting, just do like the Nazis - 100 Poles for every German.
What happened to second/third Gen Germans, Japanese, and Italians in WW2?
People seen this happen so frequently that the only reaction is disappointment in governments inability and ineptitude to protect its citizens from Islamic terror.
Sad for the victims and their families, but that won't help them at this point.
It's a good day to be conservative!
I find it odd that Islamic Conservatives and Christian Conservatives both have the same reaction after a terror attack.
I wonder if they ask themselves why they have the same reaction to such a heinous act. Probably because they are very similar
Notice how wonderful, cuddly, demilitarized UK police simply fucking fled when couple of ragheads with knives showed up.
Knives are illegal to carry in UK, btw.
I find it odd that Islamic Conservatives and Christian Conservatives both have the same reaction after a terror attack.
What reaction are "Christian Conservatives" having to the attack? I'm not one, but from what I've seen on social media, there seems to be a lot of backlash against radical Islam, sympathy for the victims, and more calls for stricter travel entry guidelines.
From the Islamic side, I see a lot of apathy to be honest (I have muslim friends on Facebook who were posting non-stop about the Bernie supporter who stabbed people in Portland, but they quickly disappeared when the identities of the London attackers became public) with a scattered amount of actual support (because of Bush wars etc).
The reactions are nothing alike.
How distant? Second cousins, third generation US citizens OK? Where will you deport them to?
Would be enough to deport ones who were naturalized. After that, community will self-police.
What reaction are "Christian Conservatives" having to the attack? I'm not one, but from what I've seen on social media, there seems to be a lot of backlash against radical Islam, sympathy for the victims, and more calls for stricter travel entry guidelines.
------------
You somehow missed the post that claimed "it's a good day to be a conservative."
From outside of your religious wars, looking in, this is a disgusting attitude. People (Christian Conservatives) cheering on these attacks, because they believe it's scoring them political points. It's abhorrent behavior, which would be fine in a free society, but these people are going to demand that my country engages in another war that it has zero chance of winning.
Par for the course for Christian Conservatives. Demand that we wage perpetual wars where the only possible outcome is to be Failed Losers, that's what CC's are all about.
The Terrorists:
1. Is Khuram Butt (al-head), Second Generation Inbred Pakistani who already appeared on a program about Jihadis next door.
2. Is a guy named Rachid Redouane, claimed to be Moroccan, had an Ireland ID Card and was allegedly married to an Irishwoman with Bad Taste.
3. Totally Uknown
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/suspects-behind-london-terrorist-attack/
Anybody wanna take a guess that #3 is a Rapefugee aka Migrant?
I don't see anyone cheering from Christian side. I guess you see what you want to see errc.
What reaction are "Christian Conservatives" having to the attack? I'm not one, but from what I've seen on social media, there seems to be a lot of backlash against radical Islam, sympathy for the victims, and more calls for stricter travel entry guidelines.
------------
You somehow missed the post that claimed "it's a good day to be a conservative."
From outside of your religious wars, looking in, this is a disgusting attitude. People (Christian Conservatives) cheering on these attacks, because they believe it's scoring them political points. It's abhorrent behavior, which would be fine in a free society, but these people are going to demand that my country engages in another war that it has zero chance of winning.
Par for the course for Christian Conservatives. Demand that we wage perpetual wars where the only possible outcome is to be Failed Losers, that's what CC's are all about.
Post #49, for the blind and willful ignorant. Followers of the Real Peaceful Religion
Leftists continue to lose in these days. Their ideology is revealed over and over to be 💩 and inconsistent drivel, their backers are proven to be craven grasping billionaires with aspirations of totalitarianism, and their "warriors" are found to be abjectly stupid criminals. It's a good day to be conservative!
First thought in the wake of tragedy: It's a good day to be conservative. Sad
You somehow missed the post that claimed "it's a good day to be a conservative."
I don't want to speak for Quigley, but he is also one person on a random internet messageboard.
Your statement said "I find it odd that Islamic Conservatives and Christian Conservatives both have the same reaction after a terror attack." Maybe you should rephrase your statement to only include Quigley?
First thought in the wake of tragedy: It's a good day to be conservative. Sad
First thought in the wake of tragedy: How can we distract from the Causes of Terror and stop Islamofauxbia?
You somehow missed the post that claimed "it's a good day to be a conservative."
I don't want to speak for Quigley, but he is also one person on a random internet messageboard.
Your statement said "I find it odd that Islamic Conservatives and Christian Conservatives both have the same reaction after a terror attack." Maybe you should rephrase your statement to only include Quigley?
Turnabout is fair play. You condemn billions of Muslims over the acts of a few Muslims, so why do you take issue with applying the same rule to Christian Cons?
They are not complex and unpredictable creatures, rather simple and predictable. That's why everyone uses them like the crusty cum rag that they are, albeit, nice people.
First thought in the wake of tragedy: It's a good day to be conservative. Sad
First thought in the wake of tragedy: How can we distract from the Causes of Terror and stop Islamofauxbia?
Maybe in your Augmented Reality, where life plays out on the Internet, but not in the real world. There's more than enough real world problems with fairly simple solutions, all within an arms reach, right here in our own backyard. But people are so driven by propaganda, and the lie that "that is too much to expect right now", or that "now is not the time for that, we must focus on things that most profit the MIC and Big Pharma first and foremost, even if its 1000's miles away in a world that I'm as likely to visit as Mars".
Go back to watching daytime Soap Operas, Nana
Turnabout is fair play. You condemn billions of Muslims over the acts of a few Muslims, so why do you take issue with applying the same rule to Christian Cons?
A few muslims? Try hundreds of millions. This data is from left leaning Pew Research.
So you're saying 100's of millions of Muslims have committed acts of terrorism?
You're a fucking liar 🤥
So you're saying 100's of millions of Muslims have committed acts of terrorism?
You're a fucking liar 🤥
They wouldn't be opposed to those acts under Sharia which is the real problem, the complete apathy, or even tacit support of terrorism from the Muslim community.
If the current trend in Terrorist attacks continues, the Candlelight vigil will be the primary cause of Global Warming.
Pew Research.
You condemn billions of Muslims over the acts of a few Muslims, so why do you take issue with applying the same rule to Christian Cons?
So you're saying 100's of millions of Muslims have committed acts of terrorism?
Turnabout is fair play. You condemn billions of Muslims over the acts of a few Muslims, so why do you take issue with applying the same rule to Christian Cons?
What's the ratio of dead Muslims from Islamofauxbia to Innocents killed by Islamic Terrorists? 1:10000?
Salafism/Wahabism is a legitimate, centuries old School of Muslim that is becoming more and more popular. If Methodism is "Real Christianity", then, by virtue of age, so is Salafism "real Islam" as the founders of the latter date back to the time of Wesley. In fact, Salafism means "Ancestors" and prides itself on being a "Return to Real Original Islam"
Please compare the number of European and American deaths by Christian Terror to that of Muslim Terror. Not even close.
I can't remember the last time Father Mayi or Praisegod Barebones shot up a Gay Bar.
If the current trend in Terrorist attacks continues, the Candlelight vigil will be the primary cause of Global Warming.
lol, ziiiiing
What happened to second/third Gen Germans, Japanese, and Italians in WW2?
What is your point?
Please compare the number of European and American deaths by Christian Terror to that of Muslim Terror. Not even close.
----------
This is not Europe, this is America, not my problem until we get our own house affairs in order, why would anyone waste time with another continents problems?
More people die of opiod overdose in America over any 48 hours period, than the totality of Muslim terrorists deaths in our nations history. Now, if you're a thinking person, you can connect the dots...like most bad policy in this country, it's roots are in Christian Conservatism...like the War on Drugs. And the Christian Conservative State wages this heinous war against its own people to this very day, bigly.
Islam is going to need some time to catch up with Christian Conservatives and all the harm they cause this country.
Get our own house in order, and right the wrongs forced upon a once Great Nation and its once Free People, before you go sending my son off to war for MIC profits and European protection.
before you go sending my son off to war....
Congratulations - I didn't recall you having a son, so maybe that's new!
The issue is not so much the horrible things that Muslims do elsewhere, but rather the determination in some quarters to spread Islam here, so it can cause problems for your daughters and everyone else here.
Also, if you want to avoid getting killed by an opioid overdose, don't take opioids, even if a licensed pusher prescribes them. You can't say the same to a snackbar with a bomb, because they don't take no for an answer. As weapons continue to advance, today's jihadis killing 10 or 100 per attack will get replaced by tomorrow's jihadis killing 10,000 or 100,000 per attack. Technology advances, but human nature remains constant, and Islam continues to command what it commands. Western civilization can survive some number of persons self-destructing on an individual basis, but it cannot survive a large number of jihadis choosing to take as many as possible with them; ISIL/Daesh know that, but some here don't.
The most odious thing is that the MSM is pushing terror attacks as if it is some kind of natural disaster, like a Tornado.
Western civilization can survive some number of persons self-destructing on an individual basis, but it cannot survive a large number of jihadis choosing to take as many as possible with them; ISIL/Daesh know that, but some here don't.
Word up.
I am curious, how many people on this forum think that collective punishment is immoral?
how many people on this forum think that collective punishment is immoral?
I'm curious what you mean, for example punishing people who:
1) advocate and finance a hijacking that kills 3,000 people, and pay to hide one of the organizers, even if they didn't fly themselves?
2) advocate and organize a genocide, even if some of them were not directly involved in personally murdering people?
3) say, "you must terrorize the enemies of Allah and kill the disbelievers," even if some of them did not personally go out and do that?
4) happen to be white, because you're mad about something some other white people did 200 years ago?
I've seen many ivory tower trustafarians endorse #4, but oppose #3, and that seems backwards to me.
I'm curious what you mean,
What I mean by what? You don't know what collective punishment means?
I am curious, how many people on this forum think that collective punishment is immoral?
If it's the relatives or friends of a terrorist, who knew the person to be radicalized and/or planning an attack, then their homes should be demolished and they should go to prison for "Failure to Report Terrorism". With wives and parents not getting an exception.
This stops the "Palestinian helps his family by gaining cash/payments for them through his 'martyrdom'" problem.
« First « Previous Comments 62 - 101 of 120 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3717339/london-bridge-attack-car-police-response-latest/
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/03/london-bridge-closed-after-serious-police-incident-reports
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/london-bridge-british-police-respond-to-incident-close-bridge/