patrick.net

Yep. So you're saying basically, "I know you are but what am I." Impressive

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

marcus says

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

Yep, I didn't think you could defend any of your crazy assertions.

Wonder what Chelseas salary was 20m and 10m in "expences" like her wedding, probably more.

marcus says

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

Yes of course. But that user hasn't posted in a very long time.

marcus says

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

"Reality has a well known Nazi bias"- said every Nazi ever.

Would like to see the top 5 employees and what their pay was.

FPBT says

What i'd like to know is why didn't the author tell us about line 8? $172,579,474. Contributions and grants. I guess it didn't fit his narrative.

Because that's INCOMING revenue the Clinton's scammed from other sources.

What exactly do you need explained about it?

FPBT says

MrMagic says

What exactly do you need explained about it?

nothing, now that you pointed out that it was revenue

Simple 101 balance sheet math.

FPBT says

But shouldn't we be comparing the $5.1 million with total expenses and not total revenue, since they didn't spend all the revenue?

That's the WHOLE problem. They DIDN'T spend all the revenues for charitable purposes, but held on to them for more of the scam expenses.

Duh.....

Liberals and math..... Geez....

marcus says

Did anyone ever claim that the single mission or function of the Clinton Foundation was only to take money and channel it to other charities ?

Yeah Marcus makes a good point. Its the Clinton led initiatives that need to be investigated. Also, disingenuous to suggest their grants are the charitable work.

The Wikileaks evidence, combined w the fact that both poor and rich countries pulled out when Clinton lost election are totally sketch. However, we can not suggest a 3% cause donation ratio from the numbers.

MrMagic says

That's the WHOLE problem. They DIDN'T spend all the revenues for charitable purposes, but held on to them for more of the scam expenses.

Maybe, but we'd need to get that info from an auditor. You can't just look at the numbers and come to this conclusion.

MisterLefty says

They list 486 employees (line 5)!

It took 486 people who are paid $34.8 million and $91.3 million in fees and expenses, to give away $5.1 MILLION WHICH IS LESS THAN 3% OF TOTAL REVENUES!

Line 22 shows ending year net assets/fund balances of $332,471,349.00 which is up $85,171,891 from last year’s tax return!

And they call this a CHARITY?

MrMagic says

That's the WHOLE problem. They DIDN'T spend all the revenues for charitable purposes, but held on to them for more of the scam expenses.

This stupidity has been debunked so many times. CIC got totally spanked on this one a couple years ago. It was even the same exact article. . .

The foundation runs it's own charity work. That's why there are 486 people on payroll. They are all over the world DOING charitable work. Here is the actual audited financial statement from 2016 (2017 audited isn't posted yet).https://www.clintonfoundation.org/sites/default/files/clinton_foundation_report_public_2016.pdf Feel free to got to page 22 note 10 and look at where the money was actually spent. There was 138 million spent for the health initiative alone providing health care to 11 million people in 33 countries in one year . . Why not compare that to trump foundation making political contributions, paying his lawyers, and buying art work for his golf courses.

The clintons are sleazebags, but the foundation is highly regarded. Charity Navigator gives it a top rating. The IRS accepts the numbers every year. But then again the IRS knows what a form 990 is and how to read it unlike the patnet "experts".

Bob using Clinton foundation statement on Clinton foundation site as proof?

Yeah that honor system did wonders for Bernie Madoff.

bob2356 says

The clintons are sleazebags, but the foundation is highly regarded. Charity Navigator gives it a top rating. The IRS accepts the numbers every year. But then again the IRS knows what a form 990 is and how to read it unlike the patnet "experts".

Yeah I agree w you for once (grudgingly).

The sketchyness regarding the Clinton Foundation isnt their charity navigator form 990 numbers. I do think there is massive corruption there, as evidenced by Wikileaks and countries pulling their investments. However, the numbers in their filings look fine.

bob2356 says

They are all over the world DOING charitable work. Here is the actual audited financial statement from 2016 (2017 audited isn't posted yet).https://www.clintonfoundation.org/sites/default/files/clinton_foundation_report_public_2016.pdf

bob2356 says

The clintons are sleazebags,

Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha HAha Ha aha aha a LOL LOL OLO LOlOLoLOLOll lOl LoL LOlO

Bob taking the word of the Clinton's that what they do is legit...

Priceless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FortWayne says

Bob using Clinton foundation statement on Clinton foundation site as proof?

Amazing stuff, right??

Hey Bob, have you found those missing 30,000 emails of Hillary's yet talking about yoga classses and Chelsea's wedding?


FPBT says

and prove Bob wrong.

That's done on a daily basis here, but he still keeps coming back.

Counterpoint: https://www.businessinsider.com/executive-compensation-at-the-red-cross-2012-11

In 2010, top executive compensation looked like this:

Executive director Gail McGovern made $561,210
EVP for biomedical services James Hrouda made $621,779
Biomedical services president Shaun Gilmore made $573,933

Nothing will happen until they are no longer useful, then they will be suicided

Booger says

History major at Stanford then a masters in international relations from Oxford made Chelsea well qualified for a job as a "as a special correspondent. One of her roles was reporting feature stories about "Making a Difference" for NBC Nightly News ". She also spent her career writing best selling children books before semi retiring with a net worth of $15,000,000. She now works for free at her, and her parents, charity foundation.

Why couldn't Biden just set up Hunter like Bill and Hillary set up Chelsae with fake jobs domestically. Trump bankrolled his kids businesses. He didn't set up no show jobs for them.

Fuckyouasshole says

Nothing will happen until they are no longer useful, then they will be suicided

They both, Bill and Hillary, have been looking pretty ill lately...

Onvacation says

They both, Bill and Hillary, have been looking pretty ill lately...

She doesn't necessarily look unhealthy here, but then again, she's not running laps around the room. Last line in the clip is hilarious...
George W. Bush says to me, ‘Well that was some weird sh-t.’”
www.youtube.com/embed/6O5WNTW8Z1A

Like mist charities used by politicians it’s 99% personal gain. And 1% for show.

CBOEtrader says

This trump story is a distraction at best. The Clinton Foundation is at the core of corruption, it may still go down in a big way.

The day that the fucking government does anything about government corruption, I'll get breast implants and cut off my dick.

It pisses me off that still at this point there's ANYBODY that believes there will EVER be any functional judicial system ever again. Not until this government is FORCED to reform.

The military has betrayed us all. "I, __, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" - bull fucking shit military man. You're a goon for the mafia, nothing more. They will hide behind their false "duty" and "integrity", they have none. The military is nothing more than the muscle for the mafia, which is our government.

Running adrenochrome factories under guise of altruistically mis-named charitable foundations isn't cheap, and the profits have to be steered under the radar. Look at all the efforts the Clintons had to go through to kidnap children and gather organ donors (with the help of the Red Cross) in Haiti after the earhquakes while pretending to build houses.

Those earthquake machines have to be meticulously directed at areas where the children can be harvested. Generating earthquakes isn't cheap.

Give a Globalist a break, why don't you?

Ceffer says

Running adrenochrome factories under guise of

I'm so sick of this being repeated. Here, want to get some adrenochrome?

https://www.echemi.com/produce/pr2302211416-factory-direct-selling-adrenochrome-99-red-to-black-powder-54-06-8-hanhong.html

It's between $20 - $25 per KILOGRAM plus shipping and handling. Pretty cheap for some sort of super drug of some sort.

richwicks says

Ceffer says

Running adrenochrome factories under guise of

I'm so sick of this being repeated. Here, want to get some adrenochrome?

https://www.echemi.com/produce/pr2302211416-factory-direct-selling-adrenochrome-99-red-to-black-powder-54-06-8-hanhong.html

It's between $20 - $25 per KILOGRAM plus shipping and handling. Pretty cheap for some sort of super drug of some sort.

BWAHAHAHAHA. No different from the bullshit about bioWEAPONSlabs and Nazis you keep repeating yourself. How does it feel to be on the receiving end of Goebbels treatment? Looks like you don't like them apples, do you? Bon appetit!

Eric Holder says

BWAHAHAHAHA. No different from the bullshit about bioWEAPONSlabs and Nazis you keep repeating yourself.

Every BSL5 "research" lab is a weapons lab. Every one. There's no difference between pure research and military research. Why else would Victoria Nuland be expressing concern in front of congress that these labs may be captured by Russians? I mean, they are just "research" labs. What's she worried about, that Russia might now find a cure for the common cold?

@"Eric Holder" - answer me that?

There's been example, after example, after example of Ukrainians sporting Nazi tattoos and paraphernalia. Here:

https://www.google.com/search?q=ukraine+nazi&tbm=isch

That's just a Google image search.

Now what "Nazism" may mean to the Ukrainians may be ENTIRELY different than what it means to Americans. I don't know, and frankly I don't care. But stop gaslighting people screaming that they shouldn't trust their eyes, ears and their own thinking - but instead trust the current American propaganda, which has changed by the way:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/11/opinion/what-ukraines-jews-fear.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/world/europe/02history.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/neo-nazi-groups-recruit-britons-to-fight-in-ukraine

There were tons of Nazi groups in Ukraine, until 2022.

You've been corrected on this many times before, you're not making a mistake at this point, you're lying. I don't know why you're so dead set on picking a side, or demanding people to deny reality. It's infantile.

There's no point in being dishonest. A mistake I can understand, errors or ignorance is perfectly understandable, but lying is disgusting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism#Ukraine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Regiment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svoboda(political_party)

Even our own controlled sites cover it, IF you know how to look for it, and it's not that hard.

Please quit lying. I'm just going to bookmark this post, and copy it when you do this again. I'm tired of it.

Eric Holder says

How does it feel to be on the receiving end of Goebbels treatment?

I hate it. Quit doing. Quit promoting US propaganda. I'm tired of American propaganda. I'm tired of people repeating it, either mindlessly, or intentionally. I'm sick of it.

IF people just learn to recognize when they've been lied to (we all been), accept that, and then fight against it, all this shit ends and I really want this shit to end. If we put Victoria Nuland in jail 22 years ago, that would have gone a long way to prevent a lot of these wars. She's been involved in nearly every foreign policy "mistake" for the last 2 decades, but she keeps "falling up" for some reason..

Gain of Function = Weaponization

Exact same process, just a different name.

It's like Eccentric = nice way of saying Weirdo

That, and a lot of politicians don't look all that youthful if they're taking adrenochrome.

Hey @"Eric Holder" - where's you're response to this post. It's really easy to accuse somebody of not knowing what they are talking about, and I know it's not pleasant to eat crow. I know directly because I've eaten plenty of it in my lifetime.

Now you know that there ARE Nazis in Ukraine - whatever that might mean to Ukrainians. Their view of what a "Nazi" is, is almost certainly different than how Americans view "Nazis" which is also different than how Germans of 1945 viewed them as.

You also know there were biological labs in Ukraine and because all BSL5 labs have dual use, and Victoria Nuland was expressing concern in front of congress, you know that it can only imply one thing.

It's fine to be in error. Everybody is wrong at times, and that's no sin, it's no personal failing.

But once corrected, then it does become a sin because it moves from making an honest mistake, to pushing a lie, which causes other people to later make the same mistake. You're sabotaging other people by lying to them. That's morally wrong, and it's a burden on people who tell the truth. It's EASY to spread a lie, and it's hard to spread the truth. People who spread the truth have to do it over, and over, and over again.

Now I'm waiting. Are you going to LIE about this from this point forward or will you not lie? Let's see.

richwicks says

Quit promoting US propaganda. I'm tired of American propaganda. I'm tired of people repeating it, either mindlessly, or intentionally. I'm sick of it.

Move. California is the main problem. So is IL. Speaker of the house has been/is from CA or IL since 1999 for 16 years. Hastert diddled kids on the wresting mat. Pelosi is a fucking moron. Paul Ryan was a neocon. So was boner. McCarthy is no different. They generally control legislation.

Just move to a country you like. You bitch about this one and likely do nothing to improve it in any way, shape or form. Your whining is falling on deaf ears at this point. No one is listening to the exact same comment over and over and over. "Ehhhh our government is corrupt, 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc." It's getting old.

WookieMan says

Just move to a country you like. You bitch about this one and likely do nothing to improve it in any way, shape or form. Your whining is falling on deaf ears at this point. No one is listening to the exact same comment over and over and over. "Ehhhh our government is corrupt, 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc." It's getting old.

Enjoy allowing your kids falling into slavery then.

I have a cousin that already abandoned this nation. I'm going to stay back her and watch it burn and say "I told you so", before I'm hauled off to the gulags.

Adrenochrome isn't the isolated industrial chemical. It's the stuff harvested from the blood of terrified children and their complex adrenal output, of which the industrial chemical is a single contributory component. They grade the quality output from particular children. It's much more expensive than cocaine, which makes it the ne plus extra designer drug.

The long term consumption of human tissues doesn't seem to work out that well, in spite of short term 'gain'. However, long term pain vs. short term gain is a characteristic of all abused drugs. Human tissue consumption seems to have neurologic consequences aka IHLlary's seizure disorders. Bill also looks unusually aged for his nominal years and had heart surgery already in his 50's. However he was also already a serious coke head since Arkansas and was remanded to rehabs in secret a couple of times.

It's hard to say how many politicians would be 'privileged' to take adrenochrome. It seems they are more into standard stimulants and cocaine when they need that extra sparkle in their eyes and zip in their step.

Whether or not adrenochrome is agent with particular individuals, it is certainly allegoric to their general attitudes and behaviors. There was that Ellen DeGenerate interview with Sandra Bullock on air, where the Sandra was just gushing about some facial that used tissues from children's foreskins. Her narcissism was much more important than pondering point of origin.

I used to not believe it, but as the puzzle pieces fall more into place, it makes odd sense. However, the Overton Window for it is steep.