Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
Matthew Rothschild
Fun of the anti-9/11 commentator misdirecting by calling everybody conspiracy theorists. 'Conspiracy Theorist' is becoming the new anti-propaganda status symbol.
At least we know they are lying.
Are you making fun of me?
The progressive Matthew Rothschild said enough of conspiracy theories such as “it was an inside job. Members of the Bush administration ordered it, not Osama Bin Laden” or “the twin tower collapse was not a consequence of planes hitting the building and the ensuing collapse, but because of explosives.”
Rothschild concludes, “I’m amazed how many people give credence to these theories.” However, he did not go on to explain the even more unlikely government conspiracy theory:
Dr. David Ray Griffin enumerates these theories, one being that hijackers with knives and box cutters defeated the most sophisticated defense system in history. To hear the whole list of implausible facts watch Part 2 of Debunking 911 Debunking.
He talks more about Rothschild and accuses him of using “conspiracy theory” as terms of abuse when all they are are theories he chooses not to believe.
So a Bush insider headed up the commission overseeing the investigation into 911 and reporting on it. Oh, but I’m sure he was completely objective and unbiased in his report.
In Part 2, Mr. Griffin covers the Popular Mechanics article “Debunking 911 Myths” and soundly shows why their article is flawed.
View the VIDEO on my website: https://inversenews.wordpress.com/2021/06/04/debunking-9-11-debunking-lets-get-empirical-pt-2-of-9/
How do we know the Bush administration wouldn’t sacrifice 3000 American lives on 911 to use as a pretext for war in the middle east? Is that so unthinkable?
The Bush administration ordered the EPA to “lie and say” the air on 9/11 was safe to breath, when it was known not to be, exposing “40 thousand workers” to toxic air, that caused “permanent debilitating diseases,” because they were told it was safe not to wear “protective gear.” As a result of this policy there will be many more deaths from cancer then there were from all the deaths on 9/11.
Mr. Griffin covers the reasons given for why that tragic day couldn’t be an inside job and argues against them successfully.
One point he makes on the 911 Commission is valid and typical of all the arguments he makes to debunk the debunkers. The executive director of the 911 Commission was Philip Zelikow, who wrote a book with Condoleezza Rice “Build a Better World”: https://www.amazon.com/Build-Better-World-Choices-Commonwealth/dp/1538764679
So a Bush administration insider headed up the commission overseeing the investigation into 911 and reporting on it. Oh, but I’m sure he was completely objective and unbiased in his report.
In Part 2, Mr. Griffin covers the Popular Mechanics article “Debunking 911 Myths” and soundly shows why their article is flawed.
SEE the VIDEO at: https://inversenews.wordpress.com/2021/06/04/debunking-9-11-debunking-lets-get-empirical-pt-2-of-9/