« First « Previous Comments 77 - 116 of 296 Next » Last » Search these comments
Sara Gonzales
@SaraGonzalesTX
15h
Yale Epidemiology Professor Dr. Harvey Risch says he would pull a healthy child out of public school and homeschool before he gave them this vaccine.
3 Minute Smackdown of the FDA
The FDA is considering the EUA status for Moderna's vaccine for kids 5 to 11 years old. One public commentator laid it all out there.
Justin Hart 40 min ago
8
2
His 3 key points (laid out in detail in the second video):
Hospital rates around pediatric COVID cases are inflated. One study out of Stanford estimated 45% of all child C19 hospitalizations were admitting for something other that COVID
By one estimate 50% of all U.S. children have recovered from COVID infections. Vaccines administered to these children absolutely pose a greater risk compared to potential infection from COVID again.
Cost/Benefit analysis must be made knowing that if a child receives a vaccine they will have boosters every 6 months and the risks grow for adverse reactions each time.
That's a cool banner, except the needles are pointed in the "vaguely Eastern symbol of auspiciousness and good luck" configuration, not the Nazi clockwise configuration.
And the panel recommended vaxxing the tykes unanimously, down to 5 years old! There were slightly more Covid hospitalizations for the age group than Covid vaccine hospitalizations for permanent heart damage so the benefit “outweighs the risk?!”
This is an atrocious decision and the FDA will undoubtedly use it to authorize an EUA for kids to take the vax. Then all the leftist parents will vax their kids, many will be permanently damaged, for the sin of having unGodly parents who are also idiots.
The adverse reactions will be downplayed, covered up, and censored. Victims and their families will be gaslighted. And then the GDA will approve the vax totally for tykes.
And then the mandates will go into effect.
I just hope this part doesn’t happen for another three months because that’ll buy us another semester.
At this point, I’m just buying time. Something will happen to change the scenario, if we buy enough time.
The mandates will not be for 5-11, but 12 up. You cannot mandate a therapy under EUA. 5-11 will be EUA.
Who? What? When? Where?
@Jimmy_Jeans
2h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
Tucker Carlson blasts the FDA panel decision approving Pfizer's vaccine for children. Important clip.
Pediatric COVID Hospitalizations Plunge As Schools Reopen, Baffling Experts
BY TYLER DURDEN
TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 07:50 PM
Children Shouldn’t Get COVID-19 Vaccines, Harvard Professor Says
BY ZACHARY STIEBER AND JAN JEKIELEK October 26, 2021
Children should not get vaccinated against the virus that causes COVID-19, according to Harvard University professor of medicine Martin Kulldorff.
FDA trying to hide data showing Pfizer’s covid “vaccine” is seriously injuring children
Wednesday, October 27, 2021
NEW YORK, NY—In a moment celebrated by all hard-working lobbyists, Pfizer announced that the COVID-19 vaccine will reduce average daily child COVID deaths from almost zero all the way down to almost zero.
“These are phenomenal results. Our internal studies have proven a microscopic benefit to an even more microscopic risk to children,” stated Dee Pimbly, head of Pfizer’s Department of Propaganda to a crowd of journalists who have not allowed their own children to bask in the warm glow of sunlight, or interact with other children for almost no reason whatsoever.
FDA officials praised Pfizer for fighting a virus that is the leading killer of children after cancer, vehicular accidents, suicide, heart disease, drowning, suffocation, the flu, meteors from space, and slipping on a banana peel. Experts say the vaccine will probably kill more kids than it saves, but it's ok because science.
When asked about any safety concerns, an FDA official replied, “We’re excited to start giving it to them so we can find out.”
The epidemic of allegedly unexplained teenage deaths continues to shock us all.
According to the UK Government’s own figures, published by The Exposé child deaths are 52% higher than the five year average since the jabbing started. And yet, officially, these are all unexplained. There is an epidemic of coincidental deaths. Perfectly healthy children are suddenly dropping dead. This is something incredibly rare. Tragically, now it is becoming common.
And still the authorities deny the link…
Newsweek presented balanced arguments for and against vaccinating kids and for some reason the Twitter blue checks got reaaaaalllly mad about it
If I had kids, they already wouldn’t have been attending public school, and this should be the mail in the coffin for anyone who’s been on the fence.
This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-
attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths
per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly
with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children.
Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the
total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further,
the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated
predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if
serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.
A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number
of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic.
The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects
of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
To reach such a conclusion the following assumptions must have been made:
Natural immunity in those children who have been infected does not exist
There is no such thing as hospital transmission to children who are already sick for another reason
Children with co-morbidities are at no greater risk than children who are healthy
Vaccination can prevent the vast majority of intensive care admissions
There is no vaccine waning in children
These assumptions are so extreme that presenting the data in this way to create a case for vaccinating healthy children amounts to negligence if not outright fraud.
I see that El Gato Malo engaged in a similar set of calculations back in September when Pfizer first released its “results.” He faced the same challenges as I did — namely, there is no usable data from Pfizer and so one has to pull from others sources. He builds a steel man case (the most generous possible defense of the Pfizer product) and yet his results are still in line with mine (my numbers are higher though because I use a lower estimate of vaccine effectiveness and correct for VAERS underreporting). So again, even under the most generous assumptions, the Pfizer mRNA shot fails any honest risk benefit assessment in connection with children 5 to 11.
Reposting here. From latest vax data as of 9/5/2021
This is insanity! I keep feeling like I am living in a dystopian movie.
This is truly disturbing.
It doesn't matter that the drug is experimental for children. It doesn't matter that children are at almost no risk from Covid.
They have to get the jab in order to satisfy the will of CNN's totally legit doctor Sanjay Gupta.
The message is that kids need to get the vaccine to slow the spread of Covid.
Why are adults forcing kids to get this jab in order to protect themselves? There's no reason for it.
This is propaganda and it is just plain wrong.
This is the number of under 12 vaxxed so far or the number of deaths of under 12 vaxxed?
This is propaganda and it is just plain wrong.
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced legislation that would prohibit the federal government and any entity at the federal, state, and local level that receives federal funding—including school districts—from requiring COVID-19 vaccines for minors.
“Parents should have the right to decide what is best for their children in consultation with their family doctor,” he said. “My view on the COVID-19 vaccine has remained clear: no mandates of any kind.
“President [Joe] Biden and his administration have repeatedly ignored medical privacy rights and personal liberty by pushing unlawful and burdensome vaccine mandates on American businesses, and now they are preparing to push a mandate on kids by pressuring parents—all without taking into account relative risk or the benefits of natural immunity.”
The bill would prohibit the federal government and any recipient of federal funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and/or the CDC at the state, local, tribal, or territorial level from requiring any individual aged 18 or younger to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
It also would prohibit any school district or educational entity from imposing a mandate requiring any students age 18 or younger to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. If any school district were to impose a mandate, it would lose eligibility to receive Title IV, Part A and Title II, Part A funding.
The bill also would require parental consent for the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine to a minor and apply to all COVID-19 vaccines that have been authorized for use under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or, if fully approved, were first approved under EUA.
« First « Previous Comments 77 - 116 of 296 Next » Last » Search these comments
I don’t know how you guys feel, but I’m never going to let them jab my kids. I have two in that age range and I’ll pull them from school completely before this. There are lots of good remote learning programs now. Correspondence courses online can work and might be more helpful than actual school.
I’m betting that a lot of other parents feel the same way. I wonder how many teachers will be laid off after they do this?
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/California-considering-vaccine-mandate-for-school-16482039.php