by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 334 - 373 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
There's no medical reason for people who have recently gotten over Covid to wear a mask.
Doctor's advice just do it anyways. "It's a small thing".
Sure ... I have faith in the medical establishment.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/cnn-anchor-questions-er-doctor-i-m-vaccinated-and-had-covid-why-do-i-still-need-to-wear-a-mask/ar-AAStkL6?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&source=patrick.net
Health ‘Experts’ Finally Admit Masks Control People, Not Viruses
BY: KYLEE ZEMPEL
JANUARY 05, 2022
Making little kids wear masks is slo-mo ritual child abuse
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/making-little-kids-wear-masks-is?source=patrick.netMaking little kids wear masks is slo-mo ritual child abuse
Well, masks weren't completely useless to Pfizer and Pfauci. They increased FEAR
Oregon considering permanent mask mandate.
The Cult of Masked Schoolchildren
History will not look kindly on our evidence-free decision to make kids suffer most
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/your-tax-dollars-at-work/comments?source=patrick.net
Transmission of Omicron in a quarantine hotel between two vaccinated individuals across a corridor
Face masks destroy evolution’s most important gift to society
Emotional expressions are our MAIN communication system
Here's the text of the letter with all the typos you'd expect from a second grader:
Dear Govener Youngkin my name is [redacted] im eight years old. I go to [redacted] Elementry School im in 2nd grade. I Agree with you that kids shouldn't wear masks in school. Here are some reasons why I dont like masks, First I cant breath, Second I miss seeing my friends face, Last I cant hear Mrs [redacted] when she talks so I don't understand what she is teaching me. So please do something because Farifax publick schools wont let us take off our masks. My BFF [redacted] is so excited to rip her MASK OFF on the 25th. There are kids that feel like me.
She's so excited that her friend will get to go maskless and she's hoping that the governor will protect her from the mandates at her county schools.
This is all at once sweet, sad, heartwarming, and heartbreaking.
These mask policies are completely inhumane and anti-children. We need more governors in the US like Youngkin and DeSantis who will prevent our kids from being forced to wear masks all day, every day.
January 21st 2022
693 Retweets 2,039 Likes
New York Times: “Masks have encouraged anonymity and discouraged dialogue. “ 'People don’t know how to communicate anymore,' said Jazlyn Korpics, 18, a senior at Liberty. 'Everybody’s a robot now — their minds are warped.'
WSJ: "Facial expressions are integral to human connection, particularly for young children ... Covering a child’s face mutes these nonverbal forms of communication and can result in robotic and emotionless interactions"
Prof. Emily Oster: "The concerns here stem from the observation that the bottom half of the face is important for reading emotions, learning to speak, and learning to read. The theory behind this is compelling." "Masks are not a friendship bracelet"
Video: "Thank you for not reaching out to the students for asking how feel about masks, because if you did, the majority of students would say they hate masks ... than you for allowing me to experience the anxiety of never seeing facial expressions."
Video: "I felt like my entire life was falling apart, because of what this government did to young people"
Pro-mask advocate. "Don't tell me 2 years of masking doesn't impact kids."
New York Times: "Masks can impede communication"
Boston Globe: "[Mask-free] students reported 'happier hallways,' 'contagious smiling,' and better class discussions. With fewer masks, English language learners and students learning foreign languages reported better communication."
TabletMag: "Fifty-nine percent of U.K. teachers in April 2021 stated that asking pupils to wear masks made understanding them a “lot more difficult.” We know that when someone conceals their lips it’s harder to comprehend what they’re saying."
SF Chronicle: "Every student is struggling with pronunciation/recognizing letter sounds. 'I am often the only adult they interact w that can articulate the sounds, but they can’t see my mouth.' It's especially hard on autistic students."
German study: “Top German scientists have found that wearing certain types of face masks for long periods of time could result in potentially hazardous chemicals and harmful microplastics being inhaled deep into human lungs.”
Rational Ground: “The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria.”
Top German scientists have found that wearing certain types of face masks for long periods of time could result in potentially hazardous chemicals and harmful microplastics being inhaled deep into human lungs.
Professor Michael Braungart, director at the Hamburg Environmental Institute and co-founder of the world-renowned Cradle to Cradle environmental standard has told Ecotextile News that mask wearers unwittingly run the risk of breathing in carcinogens, allergens and tiny synthetic microfibres by wearing both textile and nonwoven surgical masks for long periods of time.
His recent findings have been backed up by another leading industry textile chemist Dr. Dieter Sedlak, managing director and co-founder of Modern Testing Services Augsburg, Germany in partnership with Modern Testing Services Global, Hong Kong who found elevated concentrations of hazardous fluorocarbons, formaldehyde and other potentially carcinogenic substances on surgical face masks: “I can only say 100 per cent that I have similar concerns to Prof. Braungart.”
Judge rules Hochul's mask mandate unconstitutional
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WHEC) — A State Supreme Court Judge out of Nassau County has ruled that Gov. Kathy Hochul's mask mandate is unconstitutional.
Hochul enacted the mask mandate in mid-December amid an increase in COVID-19 cases attributed to the omicron variant.
Judge Thomas Rademaker wrote in his decision that the governor does not have the authority to impose the mandate and that the state legislature would have to debate and approve laws requiring masks in schools and other places.
https://www.whec.com/coronavirus/judge-rules-hochul-mask-mandate-unconstitutional/6368454/?source=patrick.net
Judge rules Hochul's mask mandate unconstitutional
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WHEC) — A State Supreme Court Judge out of Nassau County has ruled that Gov. Kathy Hochul's mask mandate is unconstitutional.
Hochul enacted the mask mandate in mid-December amid an increase in COVID-19 cases attributed to the omicron variant.
Judge Thomas Rademaker wrote in his decision that the governor does not have the authority to impose the mandate and that the state legislature would have to debate and approve laws requiring masks in schools and other places.
L.A. Schools Will Require Non-Cloth Masks (Even for Sports) and Vaccination Next Year
Enough is enough. I refuse to have our children pay the price any longer.
And please don’t insult me by saying “no one likes masks but if it keeps our kids in school” - did you bother to ask why it keeps our kids in school? It’s not because they work. We have 2 years of data from schools across the country and within our state that have been mask optional or mask mandated and there has been statically zero difference.
Why the Masked and the Unmasked Have Disdain for Each Other
The utter irrationality of mask advocacy is the single greatest reason the anti-mask people hold mask advocates in contempt.
Among the many unbridgeable divides between Americans is a completely antithetical view of mask wearing. On one side are those who wear masks almost everywhere outside their homes and who demand that others do so, including young children in class and on outdoor playgrounds, and 2-year-olds on airplanes.
On the other side are those who only wear a mask where they are punished for not doing so (most obviously, airplanes). They regard masks as essentially pacifiers for adults.
Generally speaking, these two groups have disdain for each other.
Why the pro-mask half of America holds the anti-mask half in contempt needs little explanation. They believe anti-mask Americans are putting others in grave danger. Pro-maskers believe that even children who do not wear masks put their own lives and the lives of other children and teachers at risk.
Consequently, pro-mask Americans regard those who do not wear masks, let alone those who actively oppose mask-wearing, as selfish, anti-science potential killers.
What may be less obvious is why anti-maskers hold pro-maskers in equal contempt. So, this needs explaining in greater detail. After all, anti-maskers don’t believe that maskers are putting people in hospitals.
First, anti-maskers regard the charges made against them by pro-maskers as baseless. Therefore, as odd as it sounds, anti-maskers have contempt for the pro-maskers’ contempt. To wrongly charge people with causing mass death is, to understate the case, immoral. And if this charge is demonstrably wrong, the people who level it are the ones who are anti-science.
Since each side regards the other as anti-science, what is the science?
Nearly all public health authorities claim that masks are absolutely necessary to save lives. But they have virtually no science to back up the claim.
There is, however, abundant scientific evidence that masks are worthless vis-a-vis viruses and do great harm to society.
Here is a fraction of the examples I could give:
In February 2020, U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams tweeted: “Seriously people — STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus.”
In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) Health Emergencies Program executive director, Mike Ryan, wrote: “There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any particular benefit.”
A 2010 study in France led by Laetitia Canini (Ph.D. in epidemiology and biostatistics) concluded: “We did not identify any trend in the results suggesting effectiveness of facemasks.”
A 2009 study of Japanese health workers led by epidemiologist Dr. Joshua L. Jacobs, of the University of Hawaii Medical School, concluded: “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”
As far as I could determine, the only randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of masks against COVID-19 was a 2020 study led by Henning Bundgaard of the Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark. Published in the March 2021 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, it found that 1.8% of those in the masked group and 2.1% of those in the control group became infected with COVID-19 within a month. The 0.3-point difference is statistically insignificant.
MD and epidemiologist Vinay Prasad of the University of California at San Francisco buried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s child masking recommendation in one sentence: “The CDC cannot ‘follow the science’ because there is no relevant science.”
And what about surgical masks? They are not designed to prevent the spread of viruses, but to prevent medical personnel from accidentally infecting the open wounds of patients on the operating table, and to prevent body fluids from patients spraying up into the mouths and noses of the surgical team. Dr. Colin Axon, a COVID-19 advisor to the British government, made this point clear: Medics were “unable to comprehend” the miniscule elements involved: “A Covid viral particle is around 100 nanometers, material gaps in blue surgical masks are up to 1,000 times that size, cloth mask gaps can be 5,000 times the size.”
While most studies conclude that masks are essentially useless against COVID-19, not all do. Probably the most widely cited study on behalf of mask efficacy was published in the British Medical Journal in October 2021. But it’s hardly a ringing endorsement. As the authors note, “The quality of current evidence would be graded as low or very low, as it consists of observational studies with poor methods.”
If the only problem with the pro-mask position were that it negates science, it would only be harmless nonsense.
But while it is nonsense, it is not harmless.
Take children, for example. Only time will tell how affected children have been by not seeing other children’s faces and seeing few adult faces for two years. In July 2021, an article published under the auspices of the USC Center for Health Policy and Economics addressed this issue:
“Masking is a psychological stressor for children and disrupts learning. Covering the lower half of the face of both teacher and pupil reduces the ability to communicate. In particular, children lose the experience of mimicking expressions, an essential tool of nonverbal communication. Positive emotions such as laughing and smiling become less recognizable, and negative emotions get amplified. Bonding between teachers and students takes a hit. Overall, it is likely that masking exacerbates the chances that a child will experience anxiety and depression, which are already at pandemic levels themselves.”
Yet, just this past week, the enemies of children known as teachers unions — in this case, the one that controls the Los Angeles Unified School District — issued a directive that all children must wear N95-type masks all day, including during outdoor recess, with a wire over their noses to keep the masks at maximum tightness.
The social damage of masks is not confined to children. All human interaction has suffered as a result of two years of masking. For example, people are less kind when they are anonymous.
All of that harm is more than sufficient to justify contempt for mask advocacy.
Now let’s add to that the irrationality of the pro-mask position.
Health authorities demand that people wear masks when entering restaurants, when seated on an airplane, and when walking through airports. However, an exception is made for eating and drinking. So, then, one regularly sees people on airplanes seated less than 12 inches from one another eating without masks on; people seated at airport cafes and restaurants with no masks on; and people spending about an hour eating in restaurants with no masks on.
And while on the subject of airplanes: Do pro-mask advocates think that pilots keep their masks on while flying? Do they even want them to? Does any rational person want their pilots to breathe their own carbon dioxide for six hours while flying across the country?
The utter irrationality of mask advocacy is the single greatest reason the anti-mask people hold mask advocates in contempt. How else should one regard adults who believe that two-year-olds on airplanes and five-year-olds in schools should be masked?
Watching half of our fellow Americans accept and engage in such irrational behavior (not to mention sometimes hysterically enforce it, as myriad social media videos attest) not only depresses the rest of us; it frightens us. That more than half of our country willingly obeys completely irrational orders raises the question: What irrational orders from the state would they not obey?
« First « Previous Comments 334 - 373 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,258,024 comments by 15,013 users - AmericanKulak, Ceffer online now