by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 559 - 598 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
We’ll get into the details shortly, but the conclusion gives a fantastic overview of the results:
While no cause-effect conclusions could be inferred from this observational analysis, the lack of negative correlations between mask usage and COVID-19 cases and deaths suggest that the widespread use of masks at a time when an effective intervention was most needed, i.e., during the strong 2020-2021 autumn-winter peak, was not able to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Moreover, the moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe also suggests that the universal use of masks may have had harmful unintended consequences.
The paper’s stated most important finding: “... contrary to the accepted thought that fewer people are dying because infection rates are reduced by masks, this was not the case … Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths or ~50% more deaths compared to no mask mandates.” The study theorized that the so-called “Foegen effect,” whereby hypercondensed droplets caught by masks are re-inhaled and introduced deeper into the respiratory tract, could be responsible for the increased Covid mortality rate.
I am at Bush airport N of Houston. Federal checkpoints have "masks mandatory" signs with officers wearing them. Over 95% of diverse Texans dont and just ignore the signs. Officers dont say anything.
A few older and infirm people are the only ones wearing masks. In contrast, my wife returned recently from Minneapolis and it is infected with maskholes.
I think we are separating more and more into two different countries.
David Anber, Criminal Lawyer 🇨🇦
@DavidAnber
15h
It’s hilarious when the mask-obsessed finally realize that there’s no rhyme or reason to mandatory mask rules.
Don S. Dizon MD 🇬🇺
@drdonsdizon
Jul 4
Recalling my recent trip via #pearsonairport in #Toronto. Security made me change masks- paper mask mandated. No others allowed...including N95. 😐and no one could explain the rationale. #covid19
These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention.
Carbon dioxide rises beyond acceptable safety levels in children under nose and mouth covering: Results of an experimental measurement study in healthy children
Environ Res. 2022 Sep; 212: 113564. 2022 May 28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113564
This shocking paper had no coverage by the state-sponsored media, even though it shows that the average CO2 levels in inhaled air with nose and mouth coverings in children between age 6 and 17 is well beyond acceptable levels. ...
In conclusion we have produced experimental data that show that carbon dioxide content in inhaled air rises on average to 13,000 to 13,750 ppm no matter whether children wear a surgical or an FFP2 mask. This is far beyond the level of 2,000 ppm considered the limit of acceptability and beyond the 1,000 ppm that are normal for air in closed rooms. This estimate is rather on the low side, as we only measured this after a short time without physical exertion. Decision makers and law courts should take this into consideration when establishing rules and guidance to fight infections.
In Mexico City right now and often a majority of people walking down the street are masked. Can't go into any museum without them.
Bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic ...
We propose that immunocompromised people should avoid repeated use of masks to prevent microbial infection.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/new-study-adds-growing-body-evidence-suggesting-mask-mandates-are-ineffective
More Cities Vote Not to Enforce LA County’s Mask Mandate Proposal
With a decision expected tomorrow on whether Los Angeles County will re-impose an indoor mask mandate due to COVID-19, officials from several cities said they will not enforce such a rule if it is implemented.
Study finds plastics found in masks present in patients’ lungs
Microplastic fibres were found deep in the lower lungs of living human beings in almost every person sampled in a recent UK study.
The study from Great Britain discovered microplastic particles — present in many COVID-19 masks — in the lung tissue of 11 out of 13 patients undergoing surgery.
Polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were the most prevalent substances present in the lungs.
The microscopic plastic fragments and fibres were discovered by scientists at Hull York Medical School in the UK. Some of the filaments were two millimetres long in patients undergoing surgery whose lung tissue they sampled.
The plastic dust and microscopic debris comprises the same plastics used to manufacture the ubiquitous surgical masks worn by hundreds of millions of people around the world as mandated by governments in an attempt to halt the spread of COVID-19.
Bernie's Tweets
@BernieSpofforth
7h
CANADA - Trudeau arrives in Costa Rica by private plane and without a mask. The Covid Climate change theatre doesn’t affect the leading actors, just the audience.
Keean Bexte 🇳🇱
@TheRealKeean
4h
Video has emerged of dirtbag Trudeau and his family getting off a private airforce jet not wearing any masks. The entitlement of Trudeau and his family is un-fuckung-real. Meanwhile, moms in Canada are thrown off planes because their kid won't mask up.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/new-study-adds-growing-body-evidence-suggesting-mask-mandates-are-ineffective
These images are from the so-called Spanish Flu days (1918). People then were against compulsion, just as today.
The difference today is that we know the public health officials should know better.
« First « Previous Comments 559 - 598 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,257,811 comments by 15,013 users - Ceffer, FarmersWon, goofus online now