by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 633 - 672 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
Santa Clara County could have dropped their lawsuit against Calvary Chapel and the embarrassing deposition of their public health officer would have been confidential. But they didn’t. So now it’s part of court filing and is public record. You now get to see the whole deposition for the first time. It shows clearly that she relied on a study showing masks are ineffective for her mask mandate.
Executive Summary
Santa Clara County wants Calvary Chapel to pay $3M to the County because the church didn’t require masks like Sara Cody ordered.
The lawsuit was the first opportunity to question a public health official and actually force them to answer the questions.
We finally learn in the deposition that Sara Cody’s mask mandate was based on the Bangladesh mask study. However, it is obvious to any thinking person that the study actually proved that the “benefit” of wearing a mask was too tiny to measure (i.e., zero).
Furthermore, when Science was formally asked to retract the study, they refused to acknowledge the request showing the journals are compromised as well. However, it is clear from the data collected in the study that masks do nothing.
Santa Clara County should never have required anyone to adopt a completely useless masking policy.
However, that won’t stop the lawsuit. They have their pride at stake. They want to show businesses that they can make ridiculous demands of people for no benefit, and then extract millions of dollars for non-compliance with nonsensical health directives.
They should be ashamed of themselves.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-sara-cody-deposition-transcripts
Santa Clara County could have dropped their lawsuit against Calvary Chapel and the embarrassing deposition of their public health officer would have been confidential. But they didn’t. So now it’s part of court filing and is public record. You now get to see the whole deposition for the first time. It shows clearly that she relied on a study showing masks are ineffective for her mask mandate.
Executive Summary
Santa Clara County wants Calvary Chapel to pay $3M to the County because the church didn’t require masks like Sara Cody ordered.
The lawsuit was the first opportunity to question a public health official and actually fo...
This is why ALL RESISTANCE should have been based on ffreedom. I own my body and my business...nobody else. We're being setup.
This is why ALL RESISTANCE should have been based on ffreedom. I own my body and my business...nobody else. We're being setup.
True. I shouldn't even argue that the vaxx is ineffective and dangerous, which is obviously is.
The more important point is that I own my own body and have the God-given right to refuse injections and mask without penalty. Any penalty is a direct violation of human rights.
the infected will need to be isolated
They should be ashamed of themselves.
Unfortunately, there are actual dangerous contagions such as Ebola, and the infected will need to be isolated.
It has never been shown that wearing surgical face masks decreases postoperative wound infections. On the contrary, a 50% decrease has been reported after omitting face masks. The present study was designed to reveal any 30% or greater difference in general surgery wound infection rates by using face masks or not. During 115 weeks, a total of 3,088 patients were included in the study. Weeks were denoted as "masked" or "unmasked" according to a random list. After 1,537 operations performed with face masks, 73 (4.7%) wound infections were recorded and, after 1,551 operations performed without face masks, 55 (3.5%) infections occurred. This difference was not statistically significant (p greater than 0.05) and the bacterial species cultured from the wound infections did not differ in any way, which would have supported the fact tha the numerical difference was a statistically "missed" difference. These results indicated that the use of face masks might be reconsidered. Masks may be used to protect the operating team from drops of infected blood and from airborne infections, but have not been proven to protect the patient operated by a healthy operating team.
Cindi
10 hr ago
Sarah, I can remember that moron, David Hogg, saying that even if masks were no longer required, he would continue to wear one so that no one would think he was a Republican or Trump supporter. No doubt TONS of others feel the same. And I’m sure they’re all “vax’d” & boosted up the whazoo.
I’m all for it - all of you Karens & Kens rebreathe your CO2 & have snot, sweat & other secretions & bacteria plastered to your face & revel in your superiority in having wrecked your immune system.
BOOM! Alberta Premier Danielle Smith leading the way with commonsense and science: "The detrimental effects of masking on the mental health, development and education of children in classroom setting is well understood, and we must turn the page on what has been an extremely difficult time for children, along with their parents & teachers,” Smith wrote in a statement released Oct. 29. "No masks"
From https://www.theburningplatform.com/2022/11/14/fourth-turning-winter-of-death/
Patrick says
From https://www.theburningplatform.com/2022/11/14/fourth-turning-winter-of-death/
Unbelievable what they did to children. I am so lucky that my children were already graduated and out of school and my grandkids are too young to start school. I'm afraid of how I might have handled all this masking shit.
« First « Previous Comments 633 - 672 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,257,649 comments by 15,008 users - 6DOF, Booger, HeadSet, Tenpoundbass online now