3
0

New toxxine mandate protest: today at Palo Alto City Hall, 6:20pm


 invite response                
2023 Apr 10, 1:29pm   582 views  16 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

From an email list I'm on. I'm going to go to this. Maybe @richwicks wants to join again?


Some of us went to the Cubberley Ballroom in Palo Alto yesterday and were turned away. They pointed out to Judy (the hostess) that it was a violation of California law to turn away people from a public accommodation on the basis of medical condition, and Judy agreed. She also agreed that vaccination status is covered by the Unruh Act as a “medical condition.” She then claimed that she was following “city policy” in turning away people on the basis of their vaccination status.

This needs to stop! Please email the Palo Alto City Council! city.council@CityofPaloAlto.org Here’s what you can say:


The organizers of ballroom dance classes at the Cubberley Pavilion are currently turning people away on the basis of their medical condition (being unvaccinated).

If there is to be any public dance event at the Cubberley Pavilion, it must be accessible to all, regardless of medical condition, just as it must be accessible to all regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, sexuality, gender identity, political affiliation, marital status, veteran status, source of income, or in fact any personal characteristic that has nothing to do with one’s ability to participate safely in the event. Please see this Unruh Act fact sheet:

https://dfeh.cdev.sites.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/2018/08/DFEH_UnruhFactSheet_A_Eng.pdf

You must let the organizers of this event know that turning away people on the basis of their not having received an elective medical treatment is not City policy, and that in fact, is a violation of it, since it is City policy to comply with all civil rights legislation applying to any activity occurring on City property.


I suspect Judy lied about Cubberley and the Friday Night Dancers following “city policy” seems more like it may be "Judy's policy”.

So this is something it would be good to clear up at the meeting. Perhaps it was city policy for a short while in 2021, but I think Judy and Sammy (and maybe Phil) kept the dancing shut down during 2021. Someone can check on this.

But I can tell you that I emailed Judy and Sammy (I suspect the Friday Night Dancers' email goes only to Judy, but I don’t know for sure), and she NEVER got back to me. I must have sent 3 or 4 emails over the course of two years, and received not a single reply. Not even an acknowledgment that my email had been read and considered. Nada.

If they were just following “city policy” why didn’t they write back and tell me that?

And why the snooty last line of their public dance calendar emails: If you are not fully vaccinated we look forward to dancing with you another time.

Fully vaccinated means boosters, too!

I checked Palo Alto City’s website and saw nothing about a "city policy" to exclude unvaccinated people from any venues at this late date, three-and-a-half years after the pandemic emerged, and after Newsom's state of emergency has been revoked.

The justification was NEVER the city rules. They used to say that the toxxine was required per CDC guidelines.

https://www.facebook.com/cubberleypavilion/posts/221193750257388

"In keeping up with CDC guidelines: Attendees must be fully vaccinated"

Now, this "CDC guidelines" line is gone but the requirement still stays.
I expect this will be another win for our side; my only worry is that Judy and/or Sammy may be so spooked over Covid that they’d shut down the Friday Night Ballroom Dance at Cubberley rather than let healthy unvaxxed people dance there.

Please email Palo Alto City Council ( city.council@CityofPaloAlto.org ) and join their meeting this coming Monday (April 10) at 5 pm, to provide a public comment, as described here:

https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=1109

“VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN ( https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238 )
Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone:1(669)900-6833”

Why don't we come at 6:20pm? No reason to sit there for over an hour before it starts and for 5 hours total. Unless, we hope to enjoy the study session 5:20-6:20pm, "Report and Discussion on Community Engagement Activities Planned to Implement the City’s Workplans for Calendar Year 2023"

Proof that the toxxine is still required:

http://cubberleyballroom.com/calendar/



Comments 1 - 16 of 16        Search these comments

1   richwicks   2023 Apr 10, 1:38pm  

Patrick says

From an email list I'm on. I'm going to go to this. Maybe richwicks wants to join again?


MMM, maybe. This is straight off the 522/22

250 Hamilton Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94301
2   Patrick   2023 Apr 10, 1:53pm  

richwicks says

This is straight off the 522/22


What is 522/22 ?
3   richwicks   2023 Apr 10, 2:01pm  

Patrick says


richwicks says


This is straight off the 522/22


What is 522/22 ?



Da bus. The 522 is the express, which means it skips a fair number of stops, the 22 isn't express, and it's slower.

So it goes right along where I live, and it ends at University Avenue. It's just a really easy way to get there. You're in walking distance. You can take that little bike path.
4   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2023 Apr 10, 2:09pm  

Natural immunity is "vaccinated", that is, vaccinated by the virus. Yet another reason these restrictions are not based on science.
5   Ceffer   2023 Apr 10, 2:22pm  

Kaiser finally dropped the KommieKunt Slave Mask routine, it's 'optional'. Thought they were going to keep it forever to appease the manufactured Karens and act like they actually believed in The Covid Terror bioweapon. They are going to shuffle and whistle and act like it never happened.
6   Ceffer   2023 Apr 10, 3:23pm  

DOD: "Fuck you, useless eaters, what are you going to do about it? Most of our terrorism is now directed at the citizenry." It wasn't their first attempt, just their most well funded, recent attempt. Previous attempts were dress rehearsals.

https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/101210
https://podcastindex.org/podcast/799648
7   Patrick   2023 Apr 10, 6:11pm  

While I'm waiting to speak, I thought I'd post an image of the Palo Alto city council chambers. Surprisingly empty.


8   Patrick   2023 Apr 10, 6:21pm  

Right now comments are about establishing a rental registry.

https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2022/09/15/landlords-push-back-against-proposed-rental-registry

I think it's a bad idea. We need less government, not more.
9   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2023 Apr 11, 3:22pm  

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

Natural immunity is "vaccinated", that is, vaccinated by the virus. Yet another reason these restrictions are not based on science.

What is the ICD code for natural immunity to COVID? Who wants to be that there isn't one? If there isn't one, than the WHO codes are not about science, but about tracking obedience.
10   mell   2023 Apr 11, 3:27pm  

@Patrick how did it go? Do you have a link? Thanks!
11   Patrick   2023 Apr 11, 3:39pm  

@mell I thought it went well again, but I don't know what the link to the video might be.
12   mell   2023 Apr 11, 3:59pm  

https://youtu.be/M9I-vCl8OEI.
? But it's 8 hours @Patrick
13   Patrick   2023 Apr 11, 4:11pm  

I think we spoke at about 7:30pm.
14   Patrick   2023 Apr 12, 3:55pm  

@mell Someone in the group posted this to an email list:


You can watch our comments here (with slides that we had submitted beforehand):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO-5KA3pBGI&t=10596s
15   Patrick   2023 Apr 13, 1:02pm  


Please email the Palo Alto City Council about continued discrimination at the Cubberley Ballroom:
(emails collected from https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/City-Clerk/City-Council):

Pat.Burt@CityofPaloAlto.org , Lydia.Kou@cityofpaloalto.org , kou.pacc@gmail.com , Ed.Lauing@CityofPaloAlto.org , Julie.LythcottHaims@CityofPaloAlto.org , Greer.Stone@CityofPaloAlto.org , Greg.Tanaka@cityofpaloalto.org ; greg@gregtanaka.org , Vicki.Veenker@CityofPaloAlto.org

CC to city.clerk@cityofpaloalto.org and city.attorney@cityofpaloalto.org .

Here's what I wrote (feel free to send the same thing, or change as you see fit):

"Dear Palo Alto City Council members,

As you are already aware, the operators of the city-operated Cubberley Ballroom are excluding the unvaccinated from their classes and dances. They have told some dancers that it's city policy to discriminate on the basis of vaccination status.

I have checked the city employment website, and noticed you don't have this policy for most city jobs. Only one that I could find had a vaccine requirement listed, and it's probably out of date.

Please let the Cubberley Ballroom operators know that it isn't the city policy to discriminate.

Since the COVID vaccine doesn't prevent transmission, excluding unvaccinated people from city facilities would constitute discrimination on the basis of a medical condition, which is morally wrong and also illegal in California (prohibited by the Unruh Act).

Thank you very much for your consideration.
16   Patrick   2023 Apr 13, 5:24pm  


Cubberley Ballroom removed the requirement starting April 14
http://www.cubberleyballroom.com/calendar/

(I checked before writing letters)




A second win against the evil forces of toxxination!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste