by mell ➕follow (10) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 337 - 376 of 917 Next » Last » Search these comments
To non-scientists, it seems like hyperbole to say the Atlantic ‘is on fire.’ We’re only talking about an average increase in water temperature of less than one degree. But even slight variations in ocean temperature can dramatically affect weather and sea life.
And the increase isn’t only one degree everywhere. It’s a lot more than that in spots, which will shortly become an important fact.
Whatever is happening, it’s definitely SOMETHING, and most scientists definitely have no idea what’s causing it. ...
Although a few of the many articles stretched the point, trying to claim that man’s carbon activity could be the culprit, there is no possible way that atmospheric carbon could heat the oceans this much through “global warming.” Ethical Skeptic — the same analyst who tracks covid and related death rates — has been watching and writing about this phenomenon for several months now. Paraphrasing Ethical, he proposes that the only possible source of all this energy are deap-sea ocean floor vents pouring vast amounts of superheated water into the oceans out of the Earth’s core.
Ethical’s theory reminded me of another news trend that I’ve observed this year in the scientific press. Excited deep-sea scientists have been discovering many new “hydrothermal vents” in the oceans recently...
A hydrothermal vent is a crack in the ocean’s floor out of which is shooting a vast amount of heated water, like an undersea hot spring. Except super-hot.
Ethical Skeptic has recently been publishing charts of daily sea surface temperatures, and he’s observed the anomaly developing from late last year. Historic levels of heating is showing up in the readings and much of that difference has shown up very, very recently. ...
Even a single degree over the average temperature is statistically significant, as is a one-third degree increase, because of the fact there is SO much water in the oceans. It takes a truly enormous amount of energy to heat it all up. An unimaginable amount of energy.
Especially if you’re talking about heating all that water up QUICKLY.
Ethical’s theory is the only current explanation that makes sense. The only way to generate all that energy is with something like magma or water superheated by molten rock pouring into the ocean somewhere.
Imagine LOTS of new undersea volcanoes. That could do it. ...
And as it happens, we are also seeing hot spots — places in the oceans where temperatures range much higher than one degree — which would be consistent with giant superheated vents, undersea volcanoes, or magma leaks. The hot spots might be located above these areas where super-hot water is gushing into the oceans.
Hot spots are also inconsistent with global warming, for obvious reasons. ...
I have no idea what any of this means, whether it’s something real or is another made up emergency, or whether there is any reason at all to even be concerned about it. Nor do the poor, baffled scientists. In one of the articles I reviewed, when the reporter asked a scientist what to expect in terms of weather and related side-effects from the ocean heating, she replied “Expect chaos.”
In other words, who knows? There doesn’t seem to be anything that can be done about it. We can’t fix this by making our dishwashers work even worse or by putting diapers on cows.
There’s no doubt we’re in for something new. The heating, which seems to have been happening for decades, is accelerating far beyond anything that can be explained by manmade carbon dioxide. And the first sacred cow to be slain will almost certainly be the “climate change” movement. It’s not carbon. It’s the ocean.
So I’m counting this whole thing as a blessing so far.
Sweden has just dealt a severe blow to the globalist climate agenda by scraping its green energy targets.
In a statement announcing the new policy in the Swedish Parliament, Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson warned that the Scandinavian nation needs “a stable energy system.”
Svantesson asserted that wind and solar power are too “unstable” to meet the nation’s energy requirements.
Instead, the Swedish Government is shifting back to nuclear power and has ditched its targets for a “100% renewable energy” supply.
The move is a major blow to unreliable and inefficient technology.
Countries are being pushed toward “renewable energy” to meet the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) green agenda.
Ethical Skeptic has recently been publishing charts of daily sea surface temperatures, and he’s observed the anomaly developing from late last year. Historic levels of heating is showing up in the readings and much of that difference has shown up very, very recently. ...
Even a single degree over the average temperature is statistically significant, as is a one-third degree increase, because of the fact there is SO much water in the oceans. It takes a truly enormous amount of energy to heat it all up. An unimaginable amount of energy.
Especially if you’re talking about heating all that water up QUICKLY.
Ethical’s theory is the only current explanation that makes sense. The only way to generate all that energy is with something like magma or water superheated by molten rock pouring into the ocean somewhere.
Imagine LOTS of new undersea volcanoes. That could do it. ...
https://twitter.com/ClownWorld/status/1674476438333059072
Kennedy's are mostly awesome. At least two of them.
People are looking at Robert Kennedy as a savior,
People, some people, are looking at Trump as a savior. Not many people are looking at RFK Jr as a savior. Not many are looking at him at all.
The system killed his father and his uncle. I would like to see him elected just to see what he does. If not the Dem candidate, which would be very entertaining, at least he might pull votes from Biden.
I would like to see him elected just to see what he does.
Probably ban ICE cars and gas stoves by the first EO, LOL.
Onvacation says
I would like to see him elected just to see what he does.
Probably ban ICE cars and gas stoves by the first EO, LOL.
Eric Holder says
Probably ban ICE cars and gas stoves by the first EO, LOL.
Are you going to vote for Biden again?
Onvacation says
Eric Holder says
Probably ban ICE cars and gas stoves by the first EO, LOL.
Are you going to vote for Biden again?
No, your two votes will do, just like in 2020.
PS. I guess you are not aware of the position your new Demonrat crush holds on so-called AGW... So sad.
Eric Holder says
Onvacation says
Eric Holder says
Probably ban ICE cars and gas stoves by the first EO, LOL.
Are you going to vote for Biden again?
No, your two votes will do, just like in 2020.
PS. I guess you are not aware of the position your new Demonrat crush holds on so-called AGW... So sad.
I don't think "Eric Holder" is anything other than a troll.
What's AGW?
RFK, Jr says climate change will "disrupt" civilization
IrishCentral Staff
3–4 minutes
Kennedy, Jr says “the environment is under assault everywhere”
Robert Kennedy, Jr is warning that climate change will deliver “major disruptions” to both humanity and civilization and outlines what he feels are the necessary solutions.
Read More: US Irish businessman vows to eradicate global poverty in $350 billion plan
Kennedy, Jr was featured on Yahoo Finance’s Influencers series with Andy Serwer on January 16. The president of the Waterkeeper Alliance, RFK, Jr describes himself on Twitter as a "resolute defender of the environment."
When asked about the wildfires that have been ravaging Australia, Kennedy, Jr said that they are a “predictable byproduct” of climate change and spoke of his own experience having to evacuate his California home due to fires.
He said: “All of the modeling for climate change" points to future “storms on steroids, droughts, famine, the disappearance of the ice caps, the disappearance of the glaciers on every continent, and that there's going to be major disruptions, not just to humanity, but ultimately, to civilization.”
Kennedy, Jr attributes the drastic changes to “our longtime deadly addiction to coal and oil.”
Later in the interview, Kennedy, Jr says he has a market-based approach on how to best deal with climate change.
“I believe that we should use market mechanisms, like, like carbon taxes, and the elimination of subsidies. I think that those are the things that would transition our economy, fast as from a coal-based economy.
“We ought to have a market-based economy that does what a market is supposed to do, which is to reward good behavior, which is efficiency, and punish bad behavior, which is inefficiency in ways.
“Right now, we have a market that is governed by rules that were written by the carbon incumbents to reward the dirtiest, filthiest, most poisonous, most toxic, most war-mongering fields from hell, rather than the cheap, clean, green, wholesome, and patriotic fields from heaven. We need to rationalize our marketplace so that it does the things that market is supposed to do, which is to create a society that we're all proud of and that will sustain our children.”
I think "richwicks" is nothing but a 10-line script. There is no real human being who doesn't know what AGW stands for or incapable of googling it.
the position your new Demonrat crush holds on so-called AGW...
"“Climate issues and pollution issues are being exploited by … mega billionaires” like Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Kennedy told radio host Kim Iversen over the past weekend. “The same way that COVID was exploited to use it as an excuse to clamp down top-down totalitarian controls on society and then to give us engineering solutions.”
What's AGW?
“Right now, we have a market that is governed by rules that were written by the carbon incumbents to reward the dirtiest, filthiest, most poisonous, most toxic, most war-mongering fields from hell, rather than the cheap, clean, green, wholesome, and patriotic fields from heaven. We need to rationalize our marketplace so that it does the things that market is supposed to do, which is to create a society that we're all proud of and that will sustain our children.”
richwicks says
What's AGW?
Anthropogenic Global Warming. It's what they called climate change before the world stopped warming.
Eric Holder says
“Right now, we have a market that is governed by rules that were written by the carbon incumbents to reward the dirtiest, filthiest, most poisonous, most toxic, most war-mongering fields from hell, rather than the cheap, clean, green, wholesome, and patriotic fields from heaven. We need to rationalize our marketplace so that it does the things that market is supposed to do, which is to create a society that we're all proud of and that will sustain our children.”
AGREED!
You aren't arguing against that, are you?
Eric Holder says
“Right now, we have a market that is governed by rules that were written by the carbon incumbents to reward the dirtiest, filthiest, most poisonous, most toxic, most war-mongering fields from hell, rather than the cheap, clean, green, wholesome, and patriotic fields from heaven. We need to rationalize our marketplace so that it does the things that market is supposed to do, which is to create a society that we're all proud of and that will sustain our children.”
AGREED!
You aren't arguing against that, are you?
• If CO2 is causing Global Warming, then where is the Global Warming on Mars with a CO2 concentration exceeding 950,000 ppm? Why is the average temperature of Mars at (minus) -81 °F given that the CO2 in the Martian atmosphere is 950,000 ppm? No answer.
"Don't make arguments like this. 20 years ago I'd be pointing out your dishonesty because of atmosphere of mars is far far thinner... and Mars is also much further from the sun, it gets about 1/2 the sunlight the Earth does."
« First « Previous Comments 337 - 376 of 917 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,252,331 comments by 14,950 users - Rin, RWSGFY online now