by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 149 - 188 of 239 Next » Last » Search these comments
UF Health Erasing Differences Between Male and Female in Lab Test Results for “Inclusivity”
“Patients will die as a result,” a UF Health whistleblower told The Florida Standard. ...
The whistleblower fears that the changes won’t stop with erasing long-established biological differences between male and female in diagnostic practices, such as lab test results. The employee states that “woke” medicine is rapidly gaining traction in hospitals and academia.
“Before long, biology won’t be factored into the use of a variety of drugs and treatments as well. If this moves forward – mark my words – patients will die as a result,” the employee says.
Dr. James Thorp, an ObGyn and Maternal Fetal Medicine sub-specialist with almost 44 years of clinical experience, is shocked to hear about UF’s new lab practices.
“Political correctness is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. When you start changing medical definitions for ‘inclusivity’ it hurts the individual patients. This is an utterly false narrative that is going to kill and injure people,” Dr. Thorp tells The Florida Standard. ...
Persecuted Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan: “If Twenty Percent of the Medical Profession Stood Up, This Would End!”
Australian Doctor Joins DailyClout to Discuss Repercussions for Refusing COVID jab
How the Medical Industry Burned Its Trust Capital
By Robert Blumen June 4, 2023
... The story of the accumulation and the dissipation of trust can be told through the lens of economics by borrowing the concept of capital goods. ...
Reputation and trust is a bit like capital. The opinions that peers and customers have about a person, institution or business is earned over a long time through honesty, reliability. Consistent virtuous action is a form of investment. Unlike capital goods, it cannot be sold or even directly valued in money terms, although the the concept of goodwill as a balance sheet asset is similar. Businesses with a reputation for quality products can charge more or spend less on advertising. Individuals with a good reputation in their field will have more opportunities. ..
Membership in a gang improves the prisoner’s access to prison life. For example, membership enhances the prisoner’s ability to engage in drug transactions. Gang membership communicates to other prisoners – both in the same and in different gangs – that a prisoner who violates social norms will face consequences.
A group or brand can accumulate trust capital by accepting only members who adhere to high standards of conduct. The group can amplify this by formulating a code of conduct, educating its own members, and enforcing the code. When the public sees the majority of members following the rules over time, and violators facing punishment or expulsion, the public will develop trust in the group.
Brands can provide value above independent operators by enforcing uniformity. A tourist can visit a McDonalds, ride in an Uber, or stay in a Marriott hotel almost anywhere in the world. In comparison to a local market brand that does not exist in the traveler’s home market, the tourist has a good idea of what they are getting for their money from the multinational brand because they have used the brand before and had a consistent experience. The brand is afraid that if a customer has a bad experience in one outpost they may start to question the ability of the brand to ensure uniformity.
At the peak perhaps several decades ago, the medical profession was highly trusted. This trust was earned in earlier decades when doctors had smaller practices, spent more time with patients, had autonomy in their decisions, and provided individualized care.
The trust asset on the doctor’s balance sheet has been slowly dissipating as the original supporting tenets have eroded, and for a range of other reasons: the corporatization of care, incentives by the pharmaceutical industry, increasing group-think among doctors, the dominance of third-party payers who create a competing interest between the doctor and the patient, and the growth of impersonal ideologies such as evidence-based medicine.
In a business, when a machine is damaged it can be replaced because it is fungible. Trust capital does not work that way. It is difficult to accumulate; and once destroyed, ever so much more difficult to rebuild. The relative with an alcohol or drug problem who has failed rehab multiple times will face increasing skepticism each time he tells family members that he is clean. The family may give the wayward relative multiple chances, but it may require years of continuous sobriety before family members will accept that the person has truly gotten the better of their addiction. Some breaches of trust cannot be repaired. A married person who has cheated on their spouse once may end their marriage. An employee caught stealing will be fired.
The trust capital of the medical profession was further damaged by the lying documented by Drs Baker and Malik. Dr. Baker wrote, “It must be emphasized that health authorities pushed deliberate lies, known to be lies at the time by those telling them.” What happens when you lie to people? They stop believing you. And that is how the medical consumers have responded. After being lied to about the covid “vaccine” being 95 percent effective, the public is now questioning not only what they were told about the Pfizer and Moderna products, but also childhood vaccination schedules generally. Childhood vaccination rates are down in some regions as much as 44 percent. This indicates that medical advice is receiving more skepticism. ...
It may sometimes be expedient for a man to heat the stove with his furniture. But if he does, he should know what the remoter effects will be. He should not delude himself by believing that he has discovered a wonderful new method of heating his premises.
The medical profession has burned their furniture. They believe that their failure to persuade the public of their lies was due to a failure to provide a sufficient quality or quantity of lying. They are trying to overcome their failure by propagandizing even harder. ... If the liar wishes to rebuild the trust, then a full and honest confession of the lies, expression of remorse, and a sincere pledge not to do so again would be the starting point. Other than a few dissenters who challenged the orthodoxy during the crisis, there have been vanishingly few apologies. On the contrary, the parties most responsible are trying to distance themselves from the collapse by denying that they did what they did.
Please contribute to Kathie Breault’s legal defense fund.
https://www.givesendgo.com/GANF9
In April, 2023, Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM) Kathie Breault was indicted in the Eastern States District Federal Court for “Conspiracy to Defraud the United States” for giving vaccination cards to people who did not receive Covid-19 vaccinations. Her defense is that the vaccinations were ineffective and harmful, and to administer them would violate the Hippocratic oath of health professionals (First do no harm). Her legal battle against a dishonest and vindictive federal government will require lawyer’s fees that exceed her ability to pay — a reminder that “the process is the punishment.”
Kathie has also been accused of “professional misconduct” by the New York State Licensing Board for prescribing Ivermectin via telehealth visits in July 2021. Many other medical practitioners across the United States have been similarly persecuted and some have lost their licenses to practice. Kathie has been under investigation by New York’s Office of Professional Discipline since March 2022. No decision has been reached as of May 2023.
Rally for Vigil March Up Bay Street, Toronto, Canada
Filmed September 3, 2022
"No More Shots, Let's Follow Denmark's Lead! 09/03/22"
https://rumble.com/v1ijlnz-no-more-shots-lets-follow-denmarks-lead-090322.html
TRANSCRIPT
53:10
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: If there is any other member of our family here who would like to take another
moment, wave at me and come forward. But if not I will get things a little— please, and you're welcome to come. And, ah, but we will have a peaceful march up Bay Street towards the legislature for anyone who wishes to go with us. We expect to start that in the next 15 minutes. All you have to do is stick around and we'll organize when we step peacefully out into traffic and do our vigil march.
But please listen to this lady who's been brave enough to come forward, please.
JANET [taking the microphone]: Hi, everybody. I'm Janet. I'm a registered nurse.
[cheers]
I first started to get a little bit suspicious about covid, I was working past retirement a few days a week to help out in the clinics, and as of March 2020 specifically we stopped doing testing for influenza and only tested for covid. So naturally there were no cases of influenza, there were only cases of covid. With that faulty PCR test as well. So I started to look into it, very, much more deeply. And time rolled on, and as of last fall I was formally fired for not complying with the vax mandate.
Now I told you I've already been retired, so it wasn't such a big decision for me, as some people who would lose their homes because they couldn't pay their mortgages and have their jobs lost and everything. But one thing that perplexed me, I did renew my registration, but the College of Nurses said it was reported to the college that I was fired for, with cause. And I don't have anything else negative on my record but this one bad thing, that I didn't cave in and take the shot. I'm glad I didn't. I managed to eat and live under my roof and stuff like that, but I feel for people who gave up so much. And got nowhere. Thank you.
[cheers]
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Your first name?
JANET: Janet.
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Well thank you, Janet. It's a thrill to be standing here with you. I wish our younger colleagues to get real. Look at the studies, by two people in particular, Dr. Paul Alexander, a dual citizen of both Canada and the United States. He's given the truth from the beginning. He quotes Geert Vanden Bossch, a wonderful scientist and virologist and numbers person from Europe, from I believe it's Netherlands. Vanden Bossche. Two folks, and many, many others. Laura Braden** here in Canada. Many others.
The truth is that the vaccines are harmful. Harmful in a pathetic way, especially for young children where it damages their ability to have good innate immune systems for life.
Anyone under the age of 8 who has received this vaccine will have damaged their innate immune system for their entire life. Their likelihood of getting cancer will have been increased without question. Their likelihood of getting inflammatory diseases like systemic lupus or things like that, all of these things will soar, will absolutely soar in the dear children who have been fooled. And their dear parents, who were fooled into giving these shots. From the beginning, shots should have only been given to people 30 or over, in the 30 and over age group they would have had to have a significant condition that warranted it, without that they should never have given, and, ah, ultimately, the bottom line is, they shouldn't have been given to anyone because it's a non-vaccine, it's a toxic agent, that's the truth. That's the truth.
[cheers and clapping]
JANET: Thank you so much. [inaudible]
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Thank you. Bless you.
[clapping]
57:17
[END OF EXCERPT]
💉 Speaking of doctors getting paid by pharma — just as a reminder — ProPublica ran a story back in 2019 headlined, “We Found Over 700 Doctors Who Were Paid More Than a Million Dollars by Drug and Medical Device Companies.”
The number ballooned to 2,500 doctors who were paid over a half million in 2019 by drug and device makers. In other words, even in 2019, tons of doctors were making more from their pharma connections than from treating their patients.
How do you suppose those numbers changed during the pandemic?
There might be an idea here. If doctors are so easily bought, maybe WE could start paying doctors to expose the problems with the jabs. Maybe it’s that simple. Maybe it’s just about who offers them a better deal.
Cancer DeMystified: The Untold Perspective About the #2 Killer in the World
“The current paradigm or current narrative [around cancer] is designed to make money because these drugs are really expensive. And oncologists actually are paid to give cancer drugs, so it’s a big industry. So, there’s no interest of oncologists to actually practice good medicine. It’s not in their financial interest to do so. And so, that’s the tragedy that we face,” attested accomplished physician Dr. Paul Marik during a sit-down interview with Children’s Health Defense. ...
There’s also something called the “Warburg effect,” Dr. Marik denoted. “Otto Warburg (Nobel Prize Winner), in 1928, discovered that all cancer cells — this is all cancer cells — are metabolically dysfunctional and require glucose as their prime source of fuel. They cannot use their mitochondria to generate energy. So, the consequence of that is if you deprive the cancer cell of glucose, it actually promotes cell death. So, ketosis actually is a very useful intervention if you have cancer because cancer cells can’t use ketones as a source of energy, whereas human cells can. And they’re dependent on glucose. So, if you can starve the cancer cell by limiting glucose, you’re going a long way in controlling cancer.”
A doctor has been fired after she raised the alarm about the safety of Covid shots while testifying before a Senate panel on Capitol Hill.
Dr. Renata Moon testified as an expert witness during Sen. Ron Johnson’s (R-WI) panel on COVID-19 vaccines in December 2022.
In response, Moon, a leading pediatrician, was reported to a state medical commission by Washington State University officials.
According to newly disclosed documents, the college accused Moon of promoting so-called “misinformation” about mRNA Covid shots.
The Washington Medical Commission (WMC) asserts that doctors who offer “misinformation” about Covid shotss, treatments, and preventative measures “erode the public trust in the medical profession and endanger patients.”
The WMC also encourages people to lodge complaints against doctors who allegedly provide “misinformation.”
Those doctors who are found to have spread “misinformation” will have their medical licenses revoked by the WMC.
Two Washington State University officials, Doctors Jeff Haney and James Record, referenced the commission in a letter to Dr. Moon dated March 3, 2023.
“The WMC has asked the public and practitioners to report possible spread of misinformation,” they wrote.
“There are components of your presentation that could be interpreted as a possible spread.
“As such, we are ethically obligated to make a report to the WMC to investigate possible breach of this expectation.”
In June 2023, the university informed Dr. Moon that it was effectively firing her by not renewing her appointment as a clinical associate professor of medicine.
“At this time, the needs of the college are moving in a different direction and your participation is no longer required,” Haney and Record wrote.
"Giving experimental "vaccine" to hundreds millions people" including pregnant women and toddlers based on such limited data with no informed consent, is a huge malpractice."
"Giving experimental "vaccine" to hundreds millions people" including pregnant women and toddlers based on such limited data with no informed consent, is a huge malpractice."
These vaccine mandates are actually crimes against humanity and a violation of the The Nuremberg Code.
I'm shocked nobody has been murdered over this bullshit, but given our media, maybe they have been, and it's simply not been reported.
Dr. James Thorp (OB-GYN) Interviewed by Steve Kirsch
https://rumble.com/vru732-dr.-james-thorp-on-medical-censorship.html
January 3, 2022
TRANSCRIPT OF EXCERPT
4:06
DR. JAMES THORP: [On recommending the covid "vaccines"] Certainly not for pregnant women and children.
STEVE KIRSCH: So could you then have your medical license revoked for giving your honest opinion like that?
DR. JAMES THORP: Absolutely, yes.
STEVE KIRSCH: So you're caught between your oath [Hippocratic Oath] and your duty to your patients, and losing your license.
DR. JAMES THORP: That's exactly right. There's no such thing— there's no physician or nurse in the entire United States of America that should be believed anymore.
Patients, for those of you listening, you shouldn't believe me, you shouldn't believe your physician or your nurse. We're all under a gag order. Why would you believe us? It's ridiculous. Because if we say what is opposed to the state doctrine, we will be destroyed. Our careers will be destroyed, we'll lose our livelihood, our reputation, and we'll have our families destroyed. So you shouldn't believe them.
And if that weren't bad enough, certainly there's no such thing as fair, honest, informed consent anymore, Steve. I mean, it's all null and void. When you make threats, when we've all been threatened like we have been, all nurses and all physicians, it's outrageous.
Within a six week time the American Board of Medical Specialties, the federation of the state medical boards, the American Board of Medical Specialties, mine is American Board of OB-GYN, and we've had some rather lively debates and some interactions. I've worked with them before formally, I know them all, they're all my contemporaries, I don't them all, I know two of them, Dr Susan Ramin and I know the executive director, Dr. George Wendel, and they're really reasonable people. I don't believe they have the constitution to do this, and to actually extort physicians and threaten them like this.
STEVE KIRCH: But that's what they're doing, right?
DR. JAMES THORP: That's exactly what they're doing. I held them in extremely high esteem for forty-plus years. I've worked with them formally for at least a year, I did examinations.
STEVE KIRSCH: So you've never seen anything like this before, and you've been doing this for 45 years?
DR. JAMES THORP: Forty-two years.
STEVE KIRSCH: Forty-two years. And you've never seen this kind of thing before, where you have to go and compromise your oath? So these are extraordinary times.
DR. JAMES THORP: These are bizarre times. I've never seen anything— this kind of behavior— as I ??— I served in the United States Air Force, so I a oath that I carry to my death. And I fought for freedom of this country. And I will die on this hill. I will not tolerate this. This kind of horse manure belongs over in Pyongyang, Shanghai, Moscow or Tehran. It doesn't belong in the United States of America.
STEVE KIRSCH: How many of your associates would agree with your point of view that you just expressed with me, privately. You know, where it's not for attribution, but just, you know, of your colleagues, and you asked them, hey, totally off the record, totally anonymously, can't get in trouble, how many of them are pissed off?
DR. JAMES THORP: That's a great question. I think most of them are upset with the threats. Many of them are just so busy, Steve, that they really don't, they really, I don't know where are they. In fact, many of whom I've raised their attention, they're like, "no way!" But when I show them the document and show them the threat, it's extraordinarily concerning. I have a lot of mentees, I've trained a lot of residents, medical students, ob gyn docs, and maternal field of medicine physicians around the country, and many of them have contacted me, extraordinarily upset and concerned about the American Board of OB-GYN.
And that's why I went in to them. I've been trying to communicate with them on LinkedIn for several months, and I guess some of my posts finally got to them. And I tried calling Dr. Wendel and he never returned my call, but he did send me a rather threatening email that I think I forwarded to you.
STEVE KIRSCH: So I take it these guys aren't open to, like, a pubic debate between you and representatives from the board.
DR. JAMES THORP: No.
STEVE KIRSCH: Don't want to talk about it.
DR. JAMES THORP: I'll debate anybody in the world. Bring them on. I'll debate anybody in the world.
STEVE KIRSCH: See, I always thought it was just me, that nobody wanted to debate me. So you have the same problem. We have something in common, that nobody wants to debate us.
9:05
[END OF EXCERPT]
Dr James Thorp https://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_James_Thorp.html
His social media account is https://gettr.com/user/Jamesathorpmd
Yesterday, someone connected to my office, who has an an autoimmune disease, got a call from her doctor the day before she was scheduled to get her covid booster shot. They cancelled — not rescheduled — her booster appointment explaining, “they don’t work.”
The ‘consensus’ is crumbling.
Here is the relevant clause:
"Providers currently enrolled in the Vaccines for Children Program are required to keep both publicly funded and privately purchased inventory of COVID-19 vaccines for the populations they serve."
Must purchase and keep a stock of mRNA gene therapy-based “booster” vaccines or what will be the consequences, you ask?
"Providers that have not ordered COVID-19 vaccines by Friday, October 6, 2023, will be contacted regarding non-compliance with VFC requirements to offer all ACIP recommended vaccines."
And there you have it. Comply and purchase leaky “vaccine” products that are neither safe nor effective, and which will place your infant, child and adolescent patients at significant risk of myocarditis, or face the wrath of the NY State Board of Health. Which translates into a significant risk of losing your license to practice medicine.
In fact, The Federation of State Medical Boards have said that physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine “misinformation or disinformation” are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license. They state that this includes doctors who knowingly spread false information about vaccines could lose their license. If you ever wondered why physicians don’t speak up, here is one very good answer. Just to recap, “misinformation and disinformation” consist of any information which, at the time it is “spread”, differs from the official position of either the World Health Organization or (in the case of US physicians) the pronouncements of the Federal Department of Health and Human Services. Both of which organizations’ positions have repeatedly shifted during the COVID crisis, and in the case of HHS have included intentional withholding of information (such as risk of myopericarditis) from public and medical practitioners. Therefore, those physicians who have shared verifiable truths concerning vaccine risks are defined as guilty of sharing “misinformation or disinformation”. And if that is not an Orwellian regulatory overreach, I do not know what is.
Dr. Gerson was called to New York as a consultant for a wealthy industrialist who had arthritis. He had successfully treated the patient’s brother-in-law in Europe. In a Park Avenue penthouse, he joined the house physician and another consulting specialist to see the patient. After the examination, the three physicians retired to discuss the case. Dr. Gerson proceeded to explain the treatment for arthritis he had so successfully used in Europe, then described the manner in which he expected the patient to recover. There was an awkward pause. Finally, one of the other doctors said, “Dr. Gerson, you don’t understand. This man is a wealthy member of the W.R. Grace family. They own steamship lines, banks, chemical companies, and so on. You don’t cure a patient like this, you treat him.”
This simple, insidious message drives most aspects of the medical world. The motivation to keep people healthy is completely undermined by the permeation of profiteering throughout a deeply corrupted industry that depends on the vulnerability of the suffering.
Dr. Gerson’s conclusion that most illness is related to poor diet — and thus correctible, particularly in the early stages of disease — continues to be minimized and ridiculed. ...
The flagrant marketing of noxious medications to the ill is only surpassed by the mandating of untested drugs for healthy people. No hawking is necessary; vaccines are hailed as an unassailable defense against sickness and death. Whereas other medications require patients to be diagnosed to sell a product, vaccines can be dispensed to those who have no symptoms, merely using the threat of disease to push inoculation. The government has ensured that while they are experimental, liability is diminished.
That they are described as free is a staggering lie. The inverse is true; inoculations have a special status as a commodity with unrivaled profitability as they can be forced on anyone, particularly when distributed by governments — whose revenues come from taxpayers.
This corruption is relentless. The marketing of vaccines to those who receive no benefit and are likely to suffer subtle or life-changing damage has no limitations. Without the restraint of any truth, the definitions of vaccine and adverse reaction have been changed to maximize proceeds and diminish liability. ...
The abhorrent means of extortion of an organized crime protection racket are now the standard practices of the pharmaceutical industry and their cronies; government agencies and doctors are their enforcers. This reckless atmosphere allows associated criminal activity, including the engendering of disease through negligent oversight of toxic causes and experimentation with pathogens.
https://etana.substack.com/p/persecuted-dr-jeyanthi-kunadhasan
Persecuted Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan: “If Twenty Percent of the Medical Profession Stood Up, This Would End!”
Australian Doctor Joins DailyClout to Discuss Repercussions for Refusing COVID jab
🔬 A wildly significant little study — it’s actually just a case report — quietly popped up in the American Journal of Translational Research last month, titled “Successful treatment of new-onset diabetes mellitus and IgA nephropathy after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.” It offers substantial hope to vaccine injured folks, far beyond its plain meaning.
In this case report, the researchers described a 56-year-old man who spontaneously developed atypical, adult-onset Type 2 diabetes three months after his third jab. Significantly, he had no “genetic predisposition” to diabetes, and he never had covid:
The patient was never infected with COVID-19. He had no known COVID-19 exposures and did not experience flu-like illness throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. He had no family history of kidney disease.
The introduction’s first three sentences showed amazing progress. Apparently researchers can now get published without having to idolize the jabs at all. Well, they still have to say the shots were important, but look how matter of fact the language has become:
COVID-19 vaccine has been administered in almost all countries as a critical measure used to control the pandemic. However, COVID-19 vaccination-related glomerular (kidney) diseases have become a new concern. Both the mRNA vaccine and the inactivated vaccine can cause new-onset and relapsing glomerular (kidney) disease. These diseases typically occur after the first or second dose of vaccination.
Haha. So much for “safe and effective.” The researchers stated as an obvious fact that the mRNA vaccine can cause new-onset (and relapsed) kidney disease. They didn’t even squawk it was “rare.” (They even said typically occur awfully close to the word disease.) They ignored the drooling idiots infecting the useless CDC and captured FDA, neither of which apparently has the slightest idea at all that mRNA vaccines can cause kidney diseases.
Lalalalala we can’t hear you. ...
This case is unique because the kidneys and pancreas were simultaneously affected by the vaccine. Although correlation does not imply causation, the onset of symptoms of injury of two organs soon after vaccination should be considered as the inciting event. And in this case, it was strange that the patient’s blood sugar level was dramatically high within a short period, without any history of diabetes or a propensity to the disease. Therefore we suspected that the diabetes was caused by an immunological mechanism triggered by the COVID-19 vaccination.
Based on the vaccine-related mechanism of the immune reaction, we treated the patient with glucocorticoid (a steroid) and cyclophosphamide (a leukemia drug) and successfully controlled the diabetes mellitus within a short period.
This little case report is some of the best news to come down the pike in a while. The patient’s doctors ignored the CDC, did not gaslight him, and actually considered whether the vaccines might have caused his illness. In other words, because his doctors were open-minded about the possibility of vaccine injury, and were willing to try treating him as vaccine injured — not as what it looked like on the med school flow chart (“diabetes”) — this patient is now recovering instead of baffling doctors by getting worse and worse.
Bless these doctors who used their skills and training and thought for themselves.
I bet my next paycheck that “covid vaccine injury” is not listed anywhere on Medicare’s reimbursement guidelines. But I bet diabetes is on there; you betcha. We can assume the doctors would have earned more from treating his diabetes than they did from treating his covid vaccine injury. In other words, they were even more courageous and independent than it looks at first.
Emeritus Professor Seo Byeong-seon of Korea Advises Against Taking Experimental mRNA Vaccines
“…from the beginning, I thought this was a lie. It's almost been three years, but the aspects of lying just keep appearing. We are practically being deceived, lied to...”
"They say that the coronavirus vaccine is poisonous. They say that the vaccine has absolutely no effectiveness, and I agree 100%."
In his view, the push for widespread vaccination is misguided:
"Thus, it really shouldn't be taken, and there's clearly an agenda behind it."
Professor Seo's remarks extend beyond mere criticism and enter the realm of activism. He calls for medical and scientific professionals to assert themselves:
"Doctors need to take a stand. Scientists need to rise up... Without experts taking a stand, this whole effort will collapse."
He concluded his earnest dialogue with a sobering reminder of the role of truth in public health:
"The best thing is not to take it, but the government continues to push for it. We must refuse."
His message is clear: he urges the scientific community to challenge the narrative and defend the integrity of their profession against what he perceives as a global deception.
« First « Previous Comments 149 - 188 of 239 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,252,340 comments by 14,951 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President online now