patrick.net

1. In Singapore, according to Case Fatality Ratio, MORE PEOPLE DIED after vaccinations.

First of all, let me start with the Case Fatality Ratio. During the beginning of the pandemic, prior to vaccinations, the narrative that the virus's case fatality rate was 3.4% (approximately 1 out of 30 dying) was propagated. This is a plain lie by the Western media along with the World Health Organization, and they used this number to push the experimental mRNA vaccinations under the false pretext that the "benefit outweighs the risk." ...

Many deaths in the 2020s, before vaccinations, were due to government interventions. Professor Denis Rancourt, who has written over 30 papers studying All-Cause Mortality, discovered that in 2020, prior to the vaccines, the fatality rate did not cross borders – even between countries sharing the same border. This suggests that government interventions contributed to fatality rates, as viral infections do not regard country borders. One cannot simply accept the government's narrative of a "high fatality rate" for COVID.

Here is Dr. Mike Yeadon, former VP and Chief Scientific Officer for Respiratory Diseases at Pfizer, suggesting that ventilators themselves were the cause of deaths instead of COVID. This is Mike's introduction and discussion about ventilators in his recent address to the Croatian Parliament (1 Dec 2023).

And finally, here is my conclusive evidence, Singapore's own real-world data. Singapore is one of the few countries in the world where the Case Fatality Ratio was lower in 2020, prior to vaccinations.

Singapore was one of the first few countries in the world to start their vaccination campaign on December 20, 2020.
Before the vaccination campaign, there were 58,403 cases of COVID-19 and only 29 COVID deaths, translating to a CFR of 0.05%.




... The Cleveland Clinic study essentially shows that vaccinated individuals are more likely to contract COVID at a higher rate than unvaccinated individuals. They conducted two studies; the first study showed that people vaccinated with:

One dose: are 2.07 times more likely to test positive for COVID.
Two doses: are 2.50 times more likely to test positive for COVID.
Three doses: are 3.1 times more likely to test positive for COVID.
More than three doses: are 3.53 times more likely to test positive for COVID.

The second study indicated that people who are up to date with their vaccines are 33% more likely to contract COVID compared to those who are not up to date with their vaccines. ...

According to Mortality.Watch Q2 data on Excess Deaths, Singapore ranks number one in the world with a staggering 37% excess deaths. Looking at the previous quarters, it has sustained excess deaths of more than 25% over the last few quarters. ...

As we delve into Singapore's Natural Increase Data, which calculates the number of live births minus deaths, it's become clear that we're not only seeing an uptick in excess mortality rates but also a concerning downturn in birth rates post the rollout of the COVID booster shot. This dual trend is precipitating a quite remarkable downturn in the Natural Increase figures.




... Here is a video from the Japanese Volunteer Doctors Association from Koichi discussing the major illnesses and abnormalities observed in pregnant women.



... We are now approaching a tipping point where the cost of publicly sharing criticism of the mRNA vaccinations is decreasing. The professional and personal risks that were prevalent in 2021 and 2022 have diminished to the point where it is easier to speak up, and even the timid are beginning to do so. History will not be kind to those on the wrong side.

History will not be kind to those on the wrong side.

""The science has changed" will be the excuse."

The Pseudo-Uridine Substitution in mRNA Drugs Is NOW Proven Failed. The gene therapy "vaccination" platform cannot instruct reliable protein synthesis. All human and animal use must be halted.

The significance of this meticulous research on the Pfizer product cannot be understated. This technology is currently unfit for use! It must be trashed! What of the 5.5 Billion or so recipients?

mRNA medical products, designed to instruct the body to make specific proteins, had a problem. mRNA in the human body is very short-lived and rapidly degraded. This property meant that it could not last long to enough to create the desired therapeutic effects. Enter pseudo-uridine, 2023 winner of Nobel Prize. ...

The entire mRNA platform for the Covid-19 Vaccines is based on this development. Stabilized, immune-invisible, mRNA.




How ironic, now that they refer to the award “for their discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19”.

Recall Malone in his recent presentation to UK Parliament saying he gave up on the mRNA platforms because he determined that he could not overcome the toxicity associated with it, and abandoned it for other technology platforms?

Paper published in Nature on 6 of December 2023 decimates the effective, and hints towards safety issues. The study was specifically on the Pfizer product, but should also apply to the Moderna product which also uses the same pseudo-uridine mRNA platform. The paper is very complex. In effect what it says is that the the authors have proved, through meticulous research, that the pseudo-uridine modified mRNA is unable to reliably produce the target protein due to a phenomenon called frameshifting. The start location for protein synthesis is in the wrong location, and so the protein produced is garbled. Igor Chudov explains succinctly.

https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-produce-random-junk

The mRNA zips so unreliably that only 2/3 of modified mRNA infected cells are able to produce the target protein. The other 1/3 of cells produce garbled junk proteins. This is no small effect considering that each dose of vaccine delivers trillions of mRNA instructions, which distribute throughout the body and use their encasing lipid nano-particle to slip unimpeded into cells.

Conceivably every cell (1/3 of billions infected) producing garbled junk could be producing a different garbled junk. Not only has the immune system been activated against the targeted spike protein, it will also be activated against all of the various garbled junk proteins that are produced, that will continue to be produced, maybe indefinitely. Could some of the that garbed junk, by chance, be bioactive? All will still be perceived by the immune system as foreign. ...

This is all a perfect example of why new products should never be rushed, why it takes 10 or more years to bring a new product to even initial market, why so many products that initially look promising fail upon further study, and why this should never ever have been rolled out untested to the population.

Safety problems, including dead and infertile animals, plagued mRNA technology trials. As a result, by 2017, as the Statnews article above points out, no successful products had materialized.

Substituting uridine with pseudouridine revolutionized mRNA technology because these artificially modified molecules finally bypassed our immune system checks and allowed for unusual mega-expression of their genetic code. Such prolonged genetic expression can last for half a year!

However, the new experimental mRNA technology gave us many surprises — after billions of people were force-vaccinated by injections falsely described as well-tested, safe, and effective.

We are discussing one such surprise - the lost “bits” of genetic translation leading to garbage proteins produced by vaccinated bodies at random.

Scientists found that 25-30% of vaccinated people experience unintended immune response, as the Telegraph explains:

💉 Um, no thanks! Nature ran a dreadful story this week headlined, “Self-copying RNA vaccine wins first full approval: what’s next?”

The gist is, some mad scientists in San Diego created a whole ‘new generation’ of new and improved mRNA drugs, which were promptly approved for use in Japan this week. Good luck, Japan.

To create what might be called a “turbo-charged” version of a covid mRNA vaccine, the delirious scientists took a deadly virus — mosquito-borne Venezuelan equine encephalitis, to be specific — and cut out its heart, the biological engine responsible for rapidly replicating the highly-contagious, deadly pathogen.

The scientists — and now the Japanese Ministry of Health — say there’s nothing to worry about, it’s perfectly safe.

So the developers then took the encephalitic replication engine and bolted it onto pseudouridine-stablized mRNA. The result was a ‘self-replicating’ mRNA payload, four words that should never ever have been stitched together, but here we are. Once the self-magnifying mRNA gets inside a human cell, it happily sets up shop and starts busily reproducing itself, just like Santa’s elves making toys for kids, if the toys were bioweapons and the elves were life-sized Fauci replicas.

🔬 After Kevin McKernan tested some mRNA vaccine vials and discovered plasmid DNA contaminants along with the SV40 promoter gene, the vaccine-industrial complex defiantly responded in two discrete phases. In phase one, they denied McKernan’s conclusions and called him a hack. Then a bunch of other labs confirmed McKernan’s findings and phase one was abruptly over.

In phase two, the white coated jab defenders quacked there was “no evidence” of any harm from the errant plasmids or from the monkey virus gene called the SV40 promoter. That’s where we are right now, in phase two. Well, somebody found a 2010 study in the journal Vaccine that already described the evidence of harm. It was titled, “Biosafety of DNA Vaccines: New Generation of DNA Vectors and Current Knowledge on The Fate of Plasmids After Injection.”

It should have been titled, “bio un-safety of DNA vaccines.”

The study is technically dense. So I fed the study’s summary into ChatGPT and asked for a lay English translation. ChatGPT said it looked bad:

The study you provided indicates that the Simian Virus 40 (SV40) has the ability to transport DNA plasmids into cell nuclei. Specifically, the SV40-based system efficiently transports plasmids into the nucleus of non-dividing cells. This is a crucial feature for gene therapy, as it means that the SV40 system can be used to deliver genetic material into the nuclei of cells that are not actively dividing, expanding the potential applications of this system in various therapeutic contexts.
Gene therapy. In other words, the mRNA vaccines appear to use techniques designed to modify the subject’s DNA. Ruh-roh! That’s just what they told us over and over the vaccines did not do. If the plasmids Kevin McKernan found are random contaminants, or random parts of E. coli genes, then it seems likely that some cells in people who got the jabs are being randomly engineered.

This plasmid thing, plus the previously-mentioned mistranslation defect, are quickly unraveling the jabs. As I keep saying, it’s only a matter of time.

🔬 The well-regarded Journal Cureus published a remarkable new peer-reviewed study this week titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis”. You’ll want to bookmark this study for any friends or relatives who are somehow still considering the jabs, or taking any mRNA-based jab, especially if they’ve ever recovered from cancer. The first remarkable fact was the study listed all the different cancer-promoting (oncogenic) features of the vaccines, even providing a handy-dandy visual aid helpfully charting all the different ways that mRNA jabs could possibly cause cancer:



It’s a pretty technical list, and non-med/sci folks don’t need to try understanding them all. The point is, a major journal just published a peer-reviewed paper listing eight different ways the vaccines can cause new cancers or make regressed cancers flare up again.

The CDC promised these were the safest and best-tested vaccines in human history.

Specifically, the researchers have grown concerned about something called the “multi-hit hypothesis” of cancer. It’s a theory that cancer develops not by a single event but in a gradual process caused by multiple accumulating genetic changes — called ‘hits’ — in cells. It's kind of like stacking differently-shaped blocks until they make a wobbly tower about to topple over. Each "hit" is a new mutation or a different disruption, adding up and increasing entropy until the cell goes wonky and then … cancer.

Due to the many ways mRNA vaccines “hit” cells, as shown in a long roundup of other studies, the researchers concluded that all mRNA jabs should be pulled from the market, not just covid ones (although they didn’t say it directly). Specifically, they said since there was so much evidence the jabs promote cancer, the drugmakers should be forced to prove the shots don’t cause cancer in order to continue. It's the “first do no harm” principle:

This comprehensive literature review aims to highlight the potential that COVID-19 genetic vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines, have to fulfill the multi-hit hypothesis, in that they elicit a pro-tumorigenic milieu favorable to cancer progression and/or (metastatic) recurrence. Proving this potentiality wrong is a necessary step toward satisfying the first principle of medicine: “primum non nocere” (“first, do no harm”). Indeed, all global crises pose tremendous challenges to health and welfare; yet, such exceptionalities should not be a justification for lowering scientific standards.

Because some of the outlined pro-oncogenic mechanisms are antigen-independent, current safety concerns should be promptly addressed before mRNA-based nanomedicines further transform the way diseases are managed and prevented in the future.

This new Cureus study adds yet more evidence to the growing list of mRNA’s defects, which includes the recent Nature study showing the jabs create unwanted “nonsense” proteins.

Singapore Actor Wang Lei makes a U-Turn after appearing in Vax Commercial in 2021

"If I don't get vaccinated, I can live another 5 or 8 years"

Singaporean actor Wang Lei, who energetically championed COVID-19 vaccines in a 2021 dance musical commercial, has now taken to TikTok to voice a starkly different message. The 60-year-old performer has stirred the social media pot with his candid declaration, "The new vaccines are out, but we are not going to take it!"

Lei's reasoning has a touch of dark humor: "If I'm going to die, then I'll just die, right?" He suggests he could live longer without the vaccine, rather than risk becoming "half-dead" and burdening his family, labeling vaccines as dangerous and openly discouraging their use.

I’m adding this to our U-Turn Tracker™.

Dutch experts Dr. Maarten Fornerod and Prof. Theo Schetters calls for suspension of genetic mRNA vaccines

"I think that with so much uncertainty, it would be good to just call a ceasefire. To stop these vaccines and also to learn that we must be very cautious with genetic medicines."

Consumer's Association of Malaysia (PPIM) Demands Immediate Withdrawal of mRNA Vaccines Following Alarming Safety Concerns

"This product isn't just a bad product, but indeed must be called back, or withdrawn, for evaluation or feedback or a total review or withdrawal"

In a press conference initiated by the Muslim Consumer's Association (PPIM) in Malaysia on Dec 28, 2023, a collective voice of concern was raised about the safety and efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines being administered. The call for the immediate recall of these vaccines comes amidst growing reports of adverse effects from consumers and medical professionals alike.

Dr. Kenny Yong, a COVID-19 survivor and medical doctor involved in vaccine sales and distribution, emphatically stated, "This product isn't just a bad product, but indeed must be called back, or withdrawn, for evaluation or feedback or a total review or withdrawal." Dr. Yong expressed his concerns based on personal experiences with his patients. “Indeed, patients call me saying, 'Doc, you injected me with 3 doses, and now I've got COVID for the 4th time.’ This feedback isn't just from any doctor speaking casually or someone purposely anti-vaccine. This product, after four years of feedback and product reviews, genuinely has a bad track record; there are various side effects and issues.”

Another speaker, noted for involvement in international drug trials and advisory roles with the WHO, emphasized the gravity of the situation: "Our people are dying. Everywhere we see people are dying, most of them are suffering, they cannot work." The speaker raised profound questions about the position of political figures regarding the vaccines. "After we know that these vaccines bring significant harm, after knowing that, the politicians don't see, do they? And now the world has come to know that this vaccine is not safe, vaccines are not safe; they should be stopped immediately and are being used under emergency situations, which means they are still being studied."