10
1

Kamala Harris


 invite response                
2021 Feb 2, 8:03pm   50,343 views  1,066 comments

by Onvacation   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

We need a thread for our "vice President". I'll start with when she was having cocaine fueled orgies with Montel Williams.

original link

« First        Comments 969 - 1,008 of 1,066       Last »     Search these comments

969   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Oct 25, 9:12am  

"Honey! I just voted early for Kamala!"


970   Ceffer   2024 Oct 25, 2:40pm  

Kamala the Tweaker. Her MKUltra speed limit has been reached and she is winding down badly.

971   WookieMan   2024 Oct 25, 2:51pm  

Yeah coke users are pretty obvious. That's a coke user. Not even a question.
972   Patrick   2024 Oct 25, 4:17pm  

https://ewerickson.substack.com/p/show-notes-we-have-some-trends


The Washington Post will not be endorsing Kamala Harris. For the first time in forty years, the paper will not endorse anyone.
973   Patrick   2024 Oct 25, 4:25pm  

WookieMan says

Yeah coke users are pretty obvious. That's a coke user. Not even a question.


Yes, like Zelensky.

And Slavoj Zizak, the insane but very intellegent Slovenian literary and political commentator. Usually coked out of his mind. Sometimes he touches his nose over and over.

https://rumble.com/v53l1id-julian-assanges-the-world-tomorrow-slavoj-zizek-and-david-horowitz-e2.html
976   HeadSet   2024 Oct 25, 6:48pm  

Patrick says


https://ewerickson.substack.com/p/show-notes-we-have-some-trends


The Washington Post will not be endorsing Kamala Harris. For the first time in forty years, the paper will not endorse anyone.



Bezos see Trump winning and decided to pull back on antagonizing him. Amazon is already a target for Trump pulling the subsidized Post Office deliveries and may be hurt by Trump's import tariffs.
977   Patrick   2024 Oct 26, 10:03am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/belief-models-saturday-october-26


This development was colossally catastrophic, undermining the foundations of Democrat world view. The two papers were the safest sources Democrats rely on to tell them what it’s okay to think, and what they can safely say. And those foundations of safety just slid sideways.

As with anyone whose core identity is unexpectedly challeged, the WaPo’s refusal to endorse Democrats’ selected candidate produced incandescent fury and incoherent rage. For example, the increasingly deranged, far-left podcaster Keith Olbermann, who yesterday non-ironically demanded Biden immediately arrest Elon Musk and nationalize Musk’s companies, also rage-quit the Washington Post to protest the paper’s non-endorsement...

In other words, they think Bezos is scared that he’ll get the Elon Musk treatment. Even though fear of deep state retribution was the first explanation they ran to, Democrats still can’t see that the real problem is a weaponized federal government. (Democrats cannot imagine a world where the papers’ owners have good faith, bona fide reasons for not endorsing Harris.)

Jeff Bezos and the LA Times owner, billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong, should be more worried about being punished by Democrats for their sudden betrayal. It’s more curious that they aren’t.
980   RWSGFY   2024 Oct 27, 11:18am  

Patrick says


https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1849531763326095545





He went completely bananas. That worm in his head must be not as dead as he thought it was. 🤡 Kummalala is basically Joe, who, in turn, is the continuation of Obama. Whose pussy-ass approach to foreign policy is legendary and a source of all the emboldenent of all the Commie and Mooslin fucks everywhere. So if you think that playing surrender monkey at every turn is the way to avoid the (obviously fake) boogeyman of "nukelar war" - vote demon rat, because they are the best of being weak-ass pussy surrener monkeys.
981   Patrick   2024 Oct 27, 11:43am  





Reclaim The Net
@ReclaimTheNetHQ
23h
Meta had initially removed the post, labeling it a “derogatory sexualized photoshop,” (🤔) move that reeked of overreach, especially in an election year when political critique should flow freely. The Board essentially called out Meta, urging that censoring satire—even biting political satire—poses real risks to political speech and legitimate critique, especially when candidates are involved.

While Meta did reinstate the meme, the damage was done: censorship in the lead-up to an election is a point of no return. Removing posts, only to reverse them after backlash, only bolsters an argument critics have raised for years: Meta’s policies overly stifle speech at critical moments. With this case now on record with Meta's own Oversight Board, the real question is whether Meta’s censorship will evolve—or if "too little, too late" will be the rule.
985   Patrick   2024 Oct 27, 3:16pm  

https://babylonbee.com/news/the-babylon-bee-editorial-board-officially-endorses-kamala-harris-for-president


Why Kamala? Take a look at this incredible list of just a few of her achievements:

As a young San Francisco lawyer, broke into politics by using her stunning intellect to win the favor of 60-year-old Mayor Willie Brown

Ran for President in 2020 and earned zero votes, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that she was in it purely for the love of the game

After Joe Biden announced he would select a woman of color as VP, she was a woman of color

When Mike Pence was trying to turn America to fascism, bravely intervened by saying, "I'm speaking."

Was such a popular Vice President that over 12 million people hiked thousands of miles from South America to come meet her

She is brat, which we believe means that she is as cool as a bratwurst

So beloved that she became the first person in history to win a primary without receiving a single vote
989   HeadSet   2024 Oct 28, 9:36am  




Hey Joe, if they were able to force you out then you were not in charge. Yes, they were "suckers" and "jackasses" but also "boss."
991   Patrick   2024 Oct 28, 7:53pm  




Step daughter, but still.
993   WookieMan   2024 Oct 28, 10:32pm  

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says





Might be wrong on MN. I think they're embarrassed by Walz seeing him on the national stage and how cringy he is.

Long shot, but IL could be on the table as well. They don't poll here because it's assumed to be blue. We've had republican governors.
994   Patrick   2024 Oct 29, 10:08am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/principled-tuesday-october-29-2024


The non-endorsement hot tub must look pretty good right now, and baby, it’s cold outside. The Hill ran a story yesterday headlined, “Over 200 Gannett outlets not ‘endorsing in presidential or national races’.” In other words, USA Today and all its local papers are out, sayonara; more than 200 papers in all, none of them will endorse the Cackling Candidate. ...

So far, the LA Times, the Washington Post, and now USA Today (and its 200 local papers) have defied furious readers and refused to run a simple endorsement. It’s really something.
995   WookieMan   2024 Oct 29, 12:22pm  

Patrick says

So far, the LA Times, the Washington Post, and now USA Today (and its 200 local papers) have defied furious readers and refused to run a simple endorsement. It’s really something.

I get that take, but who even uses those sites or reads those papers? That has never once influenced my vote ever. I just listen to the candidate. Kamala is a cunt. I don't know how anyone with a working brain will vote for her. Oh wait.... they didn't.
996   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Oct 29, 1:08pm  

Patrick says

So far, the LA Times, the Washington Post, and now USA Today (and its 200 local papers) have defied furious readers and refused to run a simple endorsement. It’s really something


Democracy Dies With Oligarchs
1001   RWSGFY   2024 Oct 31, 8:55am  

The_Deplorable says






Mars? Who gives a fuck about Mars?
1002   PeopleUnited   2024 Oct 31, 9:01am  

RWSGFY says

Mars? Who gives a fuck about Mars?


1003   RWSGFY   2024 Oct 31, 9:08am  

PeopleUnited says

RWSGFY says


Mars? Who gives a fuck about Mars?





Yeah, the feeling is mutual.
1004   WookieMan   2024 Oct 31, 10:58am  

RWSGFY says

Mars? Who gives a fuck about Mars?

Musk. Don't know if it will happen in our lifetimes. There's likely resources and minerals out the ass on Mars. Don't sleep on Musks' Boring company. Everyone focuses on Tesla, SpaceX and X. I don't know if I'll see it, but he has reusable rockets that could haul massive amounts of resources. AND the drilling capacity.

He's an awkward character, but I personally think he plans to fly his Boring machines to Mars and extract minerals. Think of it as a planetary gold rush.
1005   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2024 Oct 31, 11:46am  

WookieMan says

There's likely resources and minerals out the ass on Mars.


Your Anus has lots and lots of diamonds!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHLifi-VzSQ
1008   RWSGFY   2024 Oct 31, 1:17pm  

WookieMan says


RWSGFY says


Mars? Who gives a fuck about Mars?

Musk. Don't know if it will happen in our lifetimes. There's likely resources and minerals out the ass on Mars. Don't sleep on Musks' Boring company. Everyone focuses on Tesla, SpaceX and X. I don't know if I'll see it, but he has reusable rockets that could haul massive amounts of resources. AND the drilling capacity.

He's an awkward character, but I personally think he plans to fly his Boring machines to Mars and extract minerals. Think of it as a planetary gold rush.



I'm OK with that. As long as I'm not forced to pitch in. I might buy stock. Or not. The question is: WTF it has to do with the POTUS?

« First        Comments 969 - 1,008 of 1,066       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste