1
0

Why is Everyone Ignoring the Student Loan Bubble?


 invite response                
2011 May 3, 1:19pm   18,197 views  57 comments

by HousingWatcher   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Consdiering this is a forum full of people who claimed to spot the housing bubble before it burst, why is anyone not talking about the student loan bubble? Trust me, when it burst, it is going to be VERY ugly. You have thousands, if not millions, of bororwers out there whoa re going to default. It's just a matter of time.

Peter Thiel's College Bubble Theory Gains Few Believers

NEW YORK -- The average college graduate leaves school with $24,000 in debt and one in 10 are unable to find work of any kind. Recently, student loan debt exceeded credit card debt.

Much like the housing bubble, when home buyers took on outsized mortgages they were either lured into or which they knew they could ill afford, all in the service of realizing the American Dream of homeownership, students today are struggling with piles of educational debt assumed in service of a similar goal -- the American Dream of a college education.

According to the College Board, 70 years ago there were 1.5 million students enrolled at American universities. By 2006, that figure had swelled to more than 20 million. Meanwhile, the cost of tuition has grown steadily higher. Over the past 25 years, college tuition and fees have risen three times as fast as individual family income. And over the past decade, tuition has increased at a rate of 5.6 percent per year beyond the rate of general inflation.

Recently, with tuition costs rising and debt levels increasing, the skepticism has reached a boiling point.

Amid this backdrop, a Silicon Valley-based venture capitalist named Peter Thiel has inserted himself in a debate about whether a college bubble exists.

Namely, Thiel believes that a lack of innovation will result in long-term economic stagnation. He also argues that the housing bubble, which inflated the real estate market and sent prices soaring and finally crashing back to Earth, now threatens to dismantle higher education.

“A true bubble is when something is overvalued and intensely believed,” explained Thiel during a recent interview with TechCrunch. “Education may be the only thing people still believe in in the United States. To question education is really dangerous. It is the absolute taboo. It’s like telling the world there’s no Santa Claus.”

Thiel’s slant has infuriated some, and emboldened others. But is he right?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/03/college-bubble-burst_n_857082.html

#housing

« First        Comments 2 - 41 of 57       Last »     Search these comments

2   MAGA   2011 May 3, 2:23pm  

A friend of mine in Chicago is paying for her daughter to attend acting school in Los Angeles. Very pricy school. Not to mention living in SoCal for the next three or four years.

http://aada.org/home/home.html

My guess is that by the time she gets her acting "degree" (???), it will have cost well over $150K. Then what does she do? Get a job working fast foods?

I'm amazed her parents are funding this scam. No telling how many loans are involved. The Dad's (Bio and Step) I'm sure have been told to stay out of it.

My suggestion to my friend is that maybe her daughter should look into serving in the military for three years. Then she would have some educational benefits in which to pay for school. Assuming this "school" is approved by the VA.

Suggestion did not go over well.

3   terriDeaner   2011 May 3, 2:44pm  

HousingWatcher says

NEW YORK — The average college graduate leaves school with $24,000 in debt

That's it!? I'm surprised it's not more considering....

HousingWatcher says

Over the past 25 years, college tuition and fees have risen three times as fast as individual family income. And over the past decade, tuition has increased at a rate of 5.6 percent per year beyond the rate of general inflation.

4   MarkInSF   2011 May 3, 2:54pm  

Not everybody is ignoring it anymore. On a flight a few months ago I watched a 1 hour news special on the topic - one of the major news networks forget which.

I'm not sure "bubble" is the right word, but the ever rising levels of debt being offered to students to cover ever rising education costs are a large part of the CAUSE of those rising education costs, much like with the housing bubble.

5   terriDeaner   2011 May 3, 3:20pm  

SF ace says

you can default and file bankrucpcy as many time as possible, but students loan can almost never be discharged. It’s 99% risk free to the lender and 100% risky to the borrower. Of course, because the loan cannot be discharged is also the reasons the rate of interest is so low and access is easy.

= Bailout guaranteed?

6   HousingWatcher   2011 May 4, 2:45am  

That $24,000 can quickly grow during deferments when the bororwer has no job for several years. $24,000 is what they have in debt on the day of graduation. PLus, in many cases, those students will go on to grad school where their loan balance will quickly skyrocket. Law school will add $120,000 to that balance. Med school will add $250,000 to that balance.

7   terriDeaner   2011 May 4, 5:38am  

klarek says

People seem to think I’m harsh towards those who bail on their mortgage obligations. Fact is that if you’re using a loan to pay for school (and very few these days CANNOT avoid this), you’re married to that debt for life.

Out of the blue... know anyone who used mortgage debt to pay off their student loans?

8   bob2356   2011 May 4, 5:39am  

terriDeaner says

klarek says

People seem to think I’m harsh towards those who bail on their mortgage obligations. Fact is that if you’re using a loan to pay for school (and very few these days CANNOT avoid this), you’re married to that debt for life.

Out of the blue… know anyone who used mortgage debt to pay off their student loans?

No but there are allegedly people who have paid off student loans with credit card debt then bk'd.

9   terriDeaner   2011 May 4, 5:46am  

shrekgrinch says

So watch the Feds turn it into a ‘public service’ scam for those who can’t pay.

They already have (nytimes):

Obama Signs Overhaul of Student Loan Program
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/us/politics/31obama.html

Students who borrow money starting in July 2014 will be allowed to cap repayments at 10 percent of income above a basic living allowance, instead of 15 percent. Moreover, if they keep up payments, their balances will be forgiven after 20 years instead of 25 years — or after 10 years if they are in public service, like teaching, nursing or serving in the military.

10   FortWayne   2011 May 4, 2:11pm  

terriDeaner says

or after 10 years if they are in public service, like teaching, nursing or serving in the military.

thats terrible favoritism. Obama is really a big socialist after all. Way to stick it to the private sector.

11   terriDeaner   2011 May 4, 3:29pm  

ChrisLA says

terriDeaner says

or after 10 years if they are in public service, like teaching, nursing or serving in the military.

thats terrible favoritism. Obama is really a big socialist after all. Way to stick it to the private sector.

I think the point has been made before, but these are not particularly well paying jobs at the entry level. And depending on where you end up in the hierarchy of these career fields, those 10 years of debt slavery could end up being pretty rough.

12   Â¥   2011 May 4, 3:36pm  

Somebody says

Way to stick it to the private sector.

LOL.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE

13   terriDeaner   2011 May 4, 3:49pm  

Troy says

terriDeaner says

Way to stick it to the private sector.

I didn't write that - Chris did.

14   leo707   2011 May 4, 4:55pm  

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that the term "bubble" is being thrown around a little fast and loose here.

Don't get me wrong I think there is a big problem with the debt people are taking on to get a degree, and yes tuition inflation has been going crazy.

But, don't you need a "greater fool" to have a bubble?

As stated by others the debt is not dis-chargeable, and there isn't going to be another "consumer" buying someone's education (hopefully an employer will, but I hope you get the point). Pretty much the only person screwed is the indebted student. Yes I understand the greater economic implications of this, but no one else is left "holding the bag" so to speak.

15   leo707   2011 May 4, 5:08pm  

shrekgrinch says

The student loan indentured debtservitude scam is the ultimate vehicle to getting people into debt slavery, in my view.

Wow, shrek something that we are in total agreement on. I did not think I would live to see this day.
shrekgrinch says

And the federal government just took over most of it (the banks just originate the loans for the Feds with the exception of one public bank because a high-powered Dem is on that bank’s board). So watch the Feds turn it into a ‘public service’ scam for those who can’t pay.

Yeah, seems to be the direction it is going, and I don't know if I would call it a "scam"...

... not sure what the mention of an unnamed "high-powered Dem" helps with this point.... but... I guess OK...

shrekgrinch says

And watch those ‘public service volunteers’ end up working Democratic party phone banks around election time, too.

Oh, shrek... oh no... we were so close buddy...

This was just a lead in for another conspiracy theory? Oh, shrek...

Sigh...

Oh, well....

so...

close...

16   EastCoastBubbleBoy   2011 May 4, 8:09pm  

Education is an investment in ones future. Like with most things in life there are no absolutes. Jobs are not guartneeded. And situations change over time. That said, there is a difference between spend 150k for an "acting" degree vs. spending $250k to get your JD and pursue a legal career. One can make a sound investment or one can make a poor one.

I think the biggest problem with education is the fact that almost every high schooler in the country is told "you need to go to college" the focus is put on what schools they can get get accpeted into, not how to make sound career choices.

Although I agree it may not be a bubble per-se, but certainly the if the cost of a degree continues to escalate, a time will come when its cost far outweighs what it "should" when you look at the benefits of having said degree. Much as in a bubble prices rise far beyond what is sustainable. But that said the crash - that is to say people refusing to go to college, or refusing to go to the higher cost colleges - we're nowhere near that point yet.

17   The Original Bankster   2011 May 4, 8:42pm  

shrekgrinch says

One futurist blogger has defined a ‘Misandry Bubble’ and its coming collapse. It is fascinating reading…but if you have feminist bone in your body, you’ll be pissed off (fair warning). http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html

this is one of the most underreported problems in modern western societies. Men are absolutely discriminated against.

18   mdovell   2011 May 4, 9:24pm  

"That $24,000 can quickly grow during deferments when the bororwer has no job for several years. $24,000 is what they have in debt on the day of graduation. PLus, in many cases, those students will go on to grad school where their loan balance will quickly skyrocket. Law school will add $120,000 to that balance. Med school will add $250,000 to that balance."

Law school is around there..not sure about med. Grad school frankly is cheap, I actually pay a tad less than undergrad because you take fewer classes and it isn't as long (45 credits vs 120..yes night classes are slightly more to pay but even then it's cheaper)

What this is really about is how FAFSA raises the tuition. Nearly anyone can get student loans. But because there's limited amounts of teachers, staff and buildings the tuition keeps going up. If you can gurantee demand (which the government does) and supply stays the same..in any market prices will go up.

It is a bit funny because old presumptions aren't as true. Private schools already have higher tuition than public so if it can't fill the classrooms they actually lower standards rather than lower pricing. I'm in a public university and I know a private one of the same program that went from 48 credits to 42 where ours is 45...and they don't require a comprehensive exam at the end!

The for profit schools (DeVry, U of Phoenix, Kaplan) are going to probably close in the next few years. The Obama administration has said it wants more disclosure of results of their students and if they get cut off from FAFSA then there's no way students would be able to pay for it.

If we wanted to reverse this simply replace FAFSA with block grants to states to expand their university systems. Schools would have to compete and prices would go down.

In terms of why higher education is persued there's more openness from it than an employer. Students have grades, few employers will open up employee records. Turnover can be high with an employer which can render references moot. Schools have tenure which can last decades.Employers move and are more apt to close, schools not so much. Employers probably won't teach skills that are useful somewhere else because there is no incentive and why would they want to lose an employee to someone else?

"...or refusing to go to the higher cost colleges - we’re nowhere near that point yet."
Um we've been there for years now. I'm in mass and if you think that higher tiered schools aren't having a hard time getting students then you should come here. During the 90's ivy leagues pretty much started handing out large grants instead of loans to students because it was the only real way to add diversity.

Eventually what might end up happening..maybe this might be decades from now...large firms will eventually create a different set of standards maybe by industry certification or whatever in lieu of a degree.

Of course the other issue with all of this is frankly a high school diploma isn't nearly as much of what it was worth before. Heck nearly half of detroit supposedly can't read!
http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2011/05/04/report-nearly-half-of-detroiters-cant-read/

We still for some reason allow people to drop out of school fully knowing that there are no employers that will hire them (I know people that work at box stores and fast food..they don't hire them).

19   neobreaker   2011 May 4, 9:55pm  

I agree that the term "bubble" is being thrown about a little loosely here.

There was a discussion I saw somewhere that tried to define it a little more carefully.... aha, here it is: http://www.gnomanomics.com/2011/04/tuition-bubble.html

20   klarek   2011 May 4, 11:28pm  

terriDeaner says

Out of the blue… know anyone who used mortgage debt to pay off their student loans?

Personally? No. But I have read/heard countless stories and testimonials during the bubble's collapse about "victims" who did nothing wrong other than "consolidate" their debts. Congrats to them for cheating their way out of student loans, hard to blame them on that. A more honest way to have done it would be to sell the house for a profit, use the proceeds to pay the debt, and rent for a while. But greed and hope for continual equity growth kept them there.

EastCoastBubbleBoy says

I think the biggest problem with education is the fact that almost every high schooler in the country is told “you need to go to college” the focus is put on what schools they can get get accpeted into, not how to make sound career choices.

I agree, and this is in large part because so many jobs will not accept somebody without a college degree, even though there's nothing about the job that would necessitate it.

21   FortWayne   2011 May 5, 3:10am  

terriDeaner says

I think the point has been made before, but these are not particularly well paying jobs at the entry level. And depending on where you end up in the hierarchy of these career fields, those 10 years of debt slavery could end up being pretty rough.

I still don't think it excuses the Obama mentality where if one works for the government they should be treated better then a private sector. Huge special interest favoritism, government is not and should not be allowed to treat people different based on their employer.

22   HousingWatcher   2011 May 5, 3:48am  

"That said, there is a difference between spend 150k for an “acting” degree vs. spending $250k to get your JD and pursue a legal career. "

I don't see any difference between the JD and the acting degree. At the end of they day, the actor and lawyer will both be on the unemployment line. Each year, thousands upon thosuands of delusional lemmings enroll in law school thinking they are going to get a $160,000 BigLaw job. Sure they will. And I am going to marry into the British royal family.

23   Ptipking222   2011 May 5, 3:50am  

Higher education is no doubt the largest domestic bubble of our times.

The question though: how to short it? I can't really think of a way....those for-profit schools have so many other issues factoring in to their valuation...but I suppose that's the easiest target.

I'd rather short mid-tier private, non-profit colleges or the vast amounts of bogus administration jobs where all this excess money goes to. Like people working as the assistant to the assistant to the president or people who are 'consultants to assist student athletes in choosing the optimal course schedules.' Of course, this is impossible to do :P

24   HousingWatcher   2011 May 5, 3:50am  

"thats terrible favoritism. Obama is really a big socialist after all. Way to stick it to the private sector."

How is that sticking it to the private sector? Let the private sector offer the same deal.

25   HousingWatcher   2011 May 5, 3:52am  

For profit schools are not the problem. Your falling for a trap set by the higher education lobbyists to distract you from the real problem. Of the 100 most expensive colleges in the U.S., NONE of them are "for profit."

26   Â¥   2011 May 5, 3:59am  

HousingWatcher says

How is that sticking it to the private sector? Let the private sector offer the same deal.

unfortunately, gov't has to take money from the private sector to pay these student loans off.

the only conservative argument that has any traction with me is that it's too easy being generous with somebody else's money.

27   HousingWatcher   2011 May 5, 4:05am  

Fortune 500 companies are making record profits. They could always scale back their bloated executive compensation packages.

28   HousingWatcher   2011 May 5, 4:16am  

Florida corporate tax reduction goes to Gov. Scott

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- Corporations would get a tax cut of $1,100 each under a bill going to Gov. Rick Scott.

The Republican governor wanted a much bigger corporate income tax reduction than the one the GOP-controlled Legislature sent him Thursday.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/05/05/2202638/florida-corporate-tax-reduction.html#ixzz1LVFtuCGP

Yeah, and I have no doubt that corporatiosn are going to hire people since they now have an extra $1,100. No wonder the economy will never improve. Unemployment is going to be high for at least 10 years.

29   HousingWatcher   2011 May 5, 4:49am  

Corporations are hiring people... in China and India! I hope all of our software engieneer friends here don't enjoy their jobs too much. Pretty soon you might have to train your H1-B replacement!

30   Ptipking222   2011 May 5, 7:27am  

HousingWatcher says

For profit schools are not the problem. Your falling for a trap set by the higher education lobbyists to distract you from the real problem. Of the 100 most expensive colleges in the U.S., NONE of them are “for profit.”

They're not the root of the problem but they benefit from the high price/federal loan subsidization/guarantees endemic with the mainstream, non-profit schools.

It's like people in the medical device industry making millions due to the health care cost bubble/Medicare payments. They aren't the cause of the problem, but they make money off of the problem.

31   terriDeaner   2011 May 5, 7:33am  

Since the for-profit thing keeps coming up, I thought I'd point out an earlier thread that has relevant info:

For-Profit College infographic
http://patrick.net/?p=657973

What are the stats on relative successfulness for grads of profit vs. non-profit anyhow?

32   terriDeaner   2011 May 5, 7:34am  

shrekgrinch says

Bubbles aren’t about those details (who holds the bag, etc). There definition is much more simple. Here’s wiki’s explanation:
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_bubble

Good article.

33   leo707   2011 May 5, 10:11am  

terriDeaner says

Since the for-profit thing keeps coming up, I thought I’d point out an earlier thread that has relevant info:
For-Profit College infographic

http://patrick.net/?p=657973
What are the stats on relative successfulness for grads of profit vs. non-profit anyhow?

Yeah, I think the big problem with for-profits is the predatory recruitment aspect that is comparably non-existent in non-profit schools.

34   Vicente   2012 Apr 19, 5:40am  

I think the answer is simple.

WE DON'T CARE

The effect of student loan debt is less obvious. You default on your house you get booted out on the street. You can't pay back your student loans, they going to repo your education? No.

I think student debt is fine. It's self-balancing. If it's too heavy, well then they won't pay it. They'll NOT PAY in large enough numbers to put an end to the current looseness of student lending, then the tuition bubble will have been pricked.

If it's heavy but bearable, well other aspects of their financial life will suffer and they'll not dig that hole any deeper (go back for MBA) and they'll keep their kids out of it next time around.

The end.

35   Bap33   2012 Apr 20, 12:55am  

Human survival improves alot with safe shelter from climate and predators.
Human survival does not improve at all with a BA in liberal arts from Berzerkely.

It makes sense to go into debt to avoid death from exposure to climate or predators.

It make no sense to go into debt to get a degree in underwater metaphysical bong making.

Higher education is feeling the effects of the "welfare state of mind" in their system now. Enjoy.

36   Rin   2012 Apr 20, 4:20am  

The only true purpose of a college degree is to fulfill the HR (human resources) barrier of entry, into the white collar world.

Only a dozen years ago, a person with an associates degree could work as a paralegal. Today, that person would need to have a bachelors degree, even if it's in modern basket-weaving or ancient Etruscan bong making.

So what's changed, in the world of clerical work, where the undergraduate degree is the key to getting in the door? Pretty much nothing. It just creates an artificial barrier to justify the existence of personnel depts or the notion that white collar work is socioeconomic class-oriented.

37   freak80   2012 Apr 20, 4:59am  

Rin,

I think you've pretty much nailed it. A lot of it is a racket of artificial barriers to entry.

38   Rin   2012 Apr 20, 5:24am  

wthrfrk80 says

I think you've pretty much nailed it. A lot of it is a racket of artificial barriers to entry.

Yep, and thus, Thiel's argument is a bit off the mark.

There are only so many Michael Dells or Steve Jobs in the world. For the most part, anyone who isn't a part of a starting circle of biz executives, needs at least one qualification to be 'seen' in an office. If Mark Zuckerberg were to mysteriously have his FB equity be stolen, he wouldn't even be qualified to apply for a job at his former company.

What Thiel should argue for instead, is the elimination of HR depts, nationwide, and have people submit national exam scores, like a combination of SAT IIs/GRE subject tests, in lieu of a college degree, to prove that they're academically qualified to be shuffling paper in an office. People can study on their own, take exams, and submit exam scores for entry level jobs. After a generation, the college degree will in effect, become obsolete for a majority of office workers.

39   freak80   2012 Apr 20, 6:25am  

Rin says

What Thiel should argue for instead, is the elimination of HR depts, nationwide, and have people submit national exam scores, like a combination of SAT IIs/GRE subject tests, in lieu of a college degree, to prove that they're academically qualified to be shuffling paper in an office. People can study on their own, take exams, and submit exam scores for entry level jobs. After a generation, the college degree will in effect, become obsolete for a majority of office workers.

Agree, except that so many are invested in the current system (racket). It's sort of like how everyone is invested in Brawndo stock in the movie Idiocracy.

40   bmwman91   2012 Apr 20, 7:11am  

Rin says

What Thiel should argue for instead, is the elimination of HR depts, nationwide, and have people submit national exam scores, like a combination of SAT IIs/GRE subject tests, in lieu of a college degree, to prove that they're academically qualified to be shuffling paper in an office.

I think that this will just end up being the same thing as over-paying for college. There will be all sorts of American Standardized Scoring (ASS) prep-courses that only people with money, people that borrow a lot of money, or Asians will ever do well on. Standardized testing is a good idea in principle, but it is so wide open for being gamed that it inevitably becomes sort of worthless. What would be the difference between a hiring manager looking for "BA In Underwater Bong Making" and "ASS Score of 666+"?

41   PockyClipsNow   2012 Apr 20, 7:39am  

You guys need to start a for profit college to give out degrees in bong making or men kissing or afrolesbian studies or whatever. The feds will pay you wateva you want for tuition. Get in on the money makin!

« First        Comments 2 - 41 of 57       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste