patrick.net

  new post
register or log in

patrick.net's 40 proposals »

10,731 registered users, 6 online now: Blurtman, Fucking White Male, lostand confused, PCGyver, Tenpoundbass, YesYNot

HOA Installs Radar, Issues Speeding Tickets

By zzyzzx (47/47 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 7, 3:51am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   1,775 views   14 comments   watch (1)   share   quote  

http://consumerist.com/2012/11/05/hoa-installs-radar-issues-speeding-tickets/

Drivers caught violating the max. 30 mph speed limit in the community will be subject for fines from anywhere from $15 to $100, depending on how fast they are driving.

If the violating driver is a visitor of the subdivision, their ticket will be given to whichever homeowner they are visiting at the time.

Comments 1-14 of 14     Last »

1   grendel   2012 Nov 7, 4:58pm  ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

In England, when local residents don't like a speed enforcement camera, they sling a tire over the post that the camera is mounted on, pour some gas into the low spot, and set the thing on fire.

I could see a similar "solution" being useful here.

2   unstoppable   2012 Nov 7, 11:49pm  ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I am so confused by republicans and their love of gated communities. I thought they were supposed to be all about small government and liberty? Being told what color to paint your house and being fined for not mowing your lawn does not seem like the bastion of freedom.

3   zzyzzx (47/47 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 8, 12:05am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

unstoppable says

I am so confused by republicans and their love of gated communities. I thought they were supposed to be all about small government and liberty? Being told what color to paint your house and being fined for not mowing your lawn does not seem like the bastion of freedom.

HOA's have nothing to do with politics.

Anyway, I was thinking that based upon this article, that if there is someone in this development that you hated, you could, in theory, speed through this neighborhood, then park on their driveway long enough for them to see you. Then drive away. You would have to do this when they were not home.

4   zzyzzx (47/47 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 8, 12:06am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I am also thinking that this article shows a new low for HOA's.

5   Trivial   2012 Nov 8, 1:25am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Clearly the members of that HOA are in favor of the camera otherwise they could have voted against it.

I am not a fan of HOA, but it is not a dictatorship. If the members of the HOA are against something, they can definitely rally support from the other members to get rid of it.

6   FortWayne (24/24 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 8, 2:23am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Trivial says

Clearly the members of that HOA are in favor of the camera otherwise they could have voted against it.

I am not a fan of HOA, but it is not a dictatorship. If the members of the HOA are against something, they can definitely rally support from the other members to get rid of it.

Let me tell you about the HOA, and I live in one.

Either way it's just another layer of politics. It works well if you have like minded neighbors. Once you get too many spenders, it gets nasty.

7   zzyzzx (47/47 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 8, 2:54am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

SFace says

Probably there are kids on the street

You do know that if there are kids playing in the street, that's illegal and their parents should be punished. That's what back yards and parks are for.

8   grendel   2012 Nov 8, 3:00am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

zzyzzx says

SFace says

Probably there are kids on the street

You do know that if there are kids playing in the street, that's illegal and their parents should be punished. That's what back yards and parks are for.

Actually, it's only illegal if the locality has adopted an ordinance prohibiting kids from playing in the street. Without such an ordinance, it is not illegal. Did you already look up the ordinance for this Colorado locality or were you um... speculating?

9   david1   2012 Nov 8, 3:05am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I want to know what they are going to do with the money they collect in fines.

Next they will be hiring a security guard and buying a patrol car...

10   Ceffer (51/51 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 8, 3:12am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

HOA who pay for their own streets can basically pass any binding rule they want on residents if the residents approve of the rules according the the covenants and restrictions.

The caveat is that such rules cannot conflict with city, county, state or federal ordinances, in which case the HOA rules are non-binding.

A HOA cannot, for instance, prevent residents from using satellite dishes, because federal laws specifically permit them.

HOA cannot enforce placing garbage cans in garages, for instance, if the garage contains the ventilation heat/air due to federal laws that prohibit placing garbage in proximity to ventilation systems.

If you want to defeat a HOA rule, just find a county, city, state of federal law it conflicts with. If you can't find any, you are out of luck.

11   unstoppable   2012 Nov 8, 3:16am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

zzyzzx says

SFace says

Probably there are kids on the street

You do know that if there are kids playing in the street, that's illegal and their parents should be punished. That's what back yards and parks are for.

Speaking as a city kid the streets are the best playground. Nothing like a game of street football where you shake your defender by jumping into the bed of a parked pickup, therefore executing the perfect post rout.
When you live in a grid system with distributed traffic flows side streets are plenty safe for kids to muck about in.

12   zzyzzx (47/47 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 8, 4:00am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

grendel says

Actually, it's only illegal if the locality has adopted an ordinance prohibiting kids from playing in the street. Without such an ordinance, it is not illegal. Did you already look up the ordinance for this Colorado locality or were you um... speculating?

It's illegal in Baltimore City, where I live and have looked it up. It should be illegal everywhere.

13   HEY YOU (3/3 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 9, 11:07am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

APOCALYPSEFUCK,
What happens to those gated HOA communities when cannibal anarchy arrives?

14   Ceffer (51/51 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 9, 11:59am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Those gates make great pikes for severed heads and discarded breast implants.

Comments 1-14 of 14     Last »

Watch comments by email

home   top   users   about   contact  
housing crash   thunderdome   sexy pix   site suggestions  
best comments   ad hominem comment jail   patrick.net on twitter   random post  
please recommend patrick.net to republicans