patrick.net

  new post
register or log in

patrick.net's 40 proposals »

10,743 registered users, 8 online now: APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE, iwog, jazz music, lostand confused, Macropodia, rocketjoe79, Strategic Renter, Straw Man

401Ks are a waste of money

By tovarichpeter   2012 Nov 26, 10:26am   ↑ like   ↓ dislike   5 links   4,636 views   16 comments   watch (0)   share   quote  

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/11/the-401-k-is-a-240-billion-waste/265593/

Sent from my iPad

Comments 1-16 of 16     Last »

1   Kevin   2012 Nov 26, 5:18pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

We don't necessarily need the tax benefits of the 401(k), but we do need employer-managed retirement. Most people are awful at planning for their retirement, and this country can't afford to have millions of people incapable of working relying on government aid.

2   Ironman (141/151 = 93% civil)   2012 Nov 26, 11:43pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Kevin says

Most people are awful at planning for their retirement, and this country can't afford to have millions of people incapable of working relying on government aid.

We already have that..... the 47%ers...

3   swebb   2012 Nov 27, 2:36am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Agreed. Even with one person working and no employer match it's a godsend. Without it you are left with $10k (married) IRA contribution -- with the 401K it adds $17k.

I'm less sure about the advantage of putting in pre-tax vs post tax, though. I have contributed to both my Roth 401K and traditional 401K and it's not at all obvious to me that the traditional is the way to go, especially if you are trying to get as much value in and are otherwise hitting the contribution limits.

-S

4   Kevin   2012 Nov 27, 1:28pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

SFace says

The problem is it is great if you make a high income but 401K's are useless at low income level. Without tax deferred feacture, there is no way we put that much or any in retirement. We'll probably buy up more properties instead.

People at low income levels can't buy investment properties.

5   BoomAndBustCycle (1/1 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 27, 3:00pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Only the top 10% of earners could come close to being able to put $17k in a 401k. For the vast majority of married couples... $10k IRA contribution is plenty per year. Not to mention Roth IRA are better because taxes are gonna be a lot higher in the future.

6   ttsmyf   2012 Nov 27, 10:31pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

TIMING ├╝ber alles
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038

7   fil   2012 Nov 29, 4:10am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

BoomAndBustCycle says

Only the top 10% of earners could come close to being able to put $17k in a 401k. For the vast majority of married couples... $10k IRA contribution is plenty per year. Not to mention Roth IRA are better because taxes are gonna be a lot higher in the future.

It's not that hard to max your 401k unless you have a big mortgage tying up your money. With all the taxes here in CA your paychecks don't even go up that much when you lower your 401k contributions.

8   tatupu70   2012 Nov 30, 2:22am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

BoomAndBustCycle says

$10k IRA contribution is plenty per year. Not to mention Roth IRA are better because taxes are gonna be a lot higher in the future

At most companies, a $10K IRA becomes $15K in 401K. If you get a 50% company match, you really need to put in enough to get the full match.

The value of a Roth IRA isn't as clear as you make it. Taxes probably will be higher in the future, but your income will be much less in retirement so I'm not sure it will be a winning strategy. I don't think anyone can really know at this point.

9   gbenson   2012 Nov 30, 4:48am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Just checked my 401k. This years rate of return is -1.5%, my 5 year return is around 3%.

I'm making 8+% on my real estate investments (after taxes)

Why am I doing this 401k thing again?

10   tatupu70   2012 Nov 30, 4:55am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

gbenson says

Just checked my 401k. This years rate of return is -1.5%, my 5 year return is around 3%.
I'm making 8+% on my real estate investments (after taxes)
Why am I doing this 401k thing again?

8% after taxes on real estate is darn good. I question whether that is sustainable over the long term.

And I'd hope that your 401K should return more over a longer window.

But the real reason is this:

http://www.ehow.com/how-does_4600339_compound-interest-work.html

11   CL (1/1 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 30, 6:41am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

gbenson says

Why am I doing this 401k thing again?

Of course, there are alternatives to retiring. :)

12   Ceffer (65/65 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 30, 7:39am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

CL says

gbenson says

Why am I doing this 401k thing again?

Of course, there are alternatives to retiring. :)

You mean, like suicide?

13   CL (1/1 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 30, 7:46am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Ceffer says

You mean, like suicide?

Yeah, but if you invest wisely, you can pay someone to do it for you. :)

14   CL (1/1 = 100% civil)   2012 Nov 30, 7:49am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

gbenson says

This years rate of return is -1.5%

My one year is over 13%! Did Rove handle your money?

15   BoomAndBustCycle (1/1 = 100% civil)   2012 Dec 2, 2:13pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

tatupu70 says

At most companies, a $10K IRA becomes $15K in 401K. If you get a 50% company match, you really need to put in enough to get the full match.

The problem with company 401Ks is they usually choose the one that is cheapest for the company. Meaning high hidden fees and few crappy options for it's employers. I'd much rather have the smorgasbord of an IRA to choose what individual stocks and funds I want to invest in.

I agree, if the company is matching your money in a 401K.. you gotta take advantage of that... it's free money. But honestly, unless you work for a large fortune 500 company.. most small businesses aren't matching your 401K contributions.

16   HEY YOU (3/3 = 100% civil)   2012 Dec 2, 3:15pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Whenever I see anyone mention a % return, have they taken into account inflation?

Never trust the Gubberment figures?
A different estimate:
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts

Comments 1-16 of 16     Last »

Watch comments by email

home   top   users   about   contact  
#investing   #housing   #politics   #humor  
housing crash   thunderdome   sexy pix   site suggestions  
best comments   ad hominem comment jail   patrick.net on twitter   random post  
please recommend patrick.net to your enemies