patrick.net

  new post
register or log in

#investing   #housing   #politics   #humor  
10,722 registered users, 7 users online now: bob2356, CBOEtrader, Entitlemented, errc, Heres Your Card, man, Strategist

For the Married Guys (And the Guys Who Have Been Married)

By BayArea (14/14 = 100% civil)   2012 Dec 28, 2:55am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   2 links   98,212 views   668 comments   watch (4)   share   quote  

Hi guys,

As the old adage states, "Can't live with them, can't live without them."

For the guys that are married now or have been married, I'm wondering what your experience has been and if you could give a newly engaged man (hypothetical to me since I am not engaged) any piece of advise or wisdom, what would it be?

I love my GF, but for a few minutes I'm going to zoom out and look at things from a more technical, statistical, and less emotional point of view.

To be honest, I am a bit discouraged at just how many people I know who don't seem to be too happy in their marriages. It always seems to be the same story. Things started off great. There was excitement, adventure, strong physical and emotional chemistry. Then 2-3yrs into it, those feels started to fade. Some couples moved on to the next phase of their lives and had some glue, er I mean kids which kept things fresh and exciting.

I saw a plot in the newspaper several years back that showed divorce statistics as a function of time. There is a spike early on in the marriage (first couple of years), then one at 7 years (7-year itch), and one at about year 18-20 (when the glue is all grown up). If you make it past that, you are fairly safe (not necessarily happy, but likelihood of divorce is low). Some of that is influenced by the fact that you don't have the same options at 45 or 50 as you do at 25 or 30. Sucks, but that's the truth.

I recall reading a book by psycologist Scott Peck that studied the term "Love." He argues that 100% of relationships fall out of love, usually pretty early on in the first few years. The feeling of love is not true love then. The conscious decision to love someone once you lose the "in love" feeling is what real love is all about.

Regarding statistics, 50% of couples who get married in this country wind up in divorce (To be fair, some of those aren't 1st marriages so that 50% number isn't quite as bad as it seems - The reason is that 2nd marriages have a higher divorce rate than 1st marriages and 3rd marriages have a higher divorce rate than 2nd marriages). Moving on, if 50% of couples get divorced, then 50% of couples don't get divorced. Surely those 50% that remain together aren't all happy marriages? So then let's say that half of the marriages that stay together are happy. That means that 25% of couples getting married in the first place remain happy, lol. I really don't like the odds here!

But anytime you get into this debate, you have to get into the alternative, being alone into older age. As much as I see my folks fight and bicker, I tend to think it's better than the alternative (at least for the level they fight and bicker).

A while back Patrick argued that the average person remains in their purchased home for no more than 6-7 years. He said, you might think you are different, but statistically you are not. Same thing goes for divorce. Nobody goes into marriage thinking they will get a divorce. But statistically, 1 in 2 people do in the USA.

What do you guys think?

As a side note, I am really curious about the following. What is the divorce rate assuming the following:

Both Members are devout Catholic ?
Both Members are devout Christian ?
Both Members are devout Muslim ?
Both Members are Atheist ?
Members don't share religious beliefs ?

« First     « Previous     Comments 509-548 of 668     Next »     Last »

509   Oxygen   2013 Feb 6, 12:16pm  ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

Do not marry American women.

Do not marry
1. women in countries where they are incentivized to divorce
2. westernized women with hook-up culture values

510   lostand confused (10/10 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 6, 1:04pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Oxygen says

iwog says



Do not marry American women.


Do not marry
1. women in countries where they are incentivized to divorce
2. westernized women with hook-up culture values

That is all fine. But equality means, you forge your own path. The laws need to change. You can't force someone to stay with you, but if they or you leave, then you shouldn't be able to force someone to pay you for life. It is not right and that is why you hear all these rap songs about hos and gold diggers.

Act like an equal-if you choose to stay at home, then your choice. Initial support is fine, transitory-like a severance package-but ultimately you are your own person. Just because you were a housewife married to Bill Gates as opposed to an alcoholic wife beater who never works-does not mean you get half of Bill gates fortune. You got free bills, vacations, health insurance, food, electricity etc -now go get a job. This legal gold digging mentality has to stop.

That is my problem with the republicans and the democrats. The democrats have thrown in their lot with the pseudo feminists and the republicans have this cave man mentality -instead of dealing with the problems of the modern man.

511   Wiseman   2013 Feb 6, 11:22pm  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

I got lucky. Second wife made up for all the pain of the first. Beautiful old school and brilliant. Did not want kids. For me she is perfect. And she is Canadian.
First thing you must remember, You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

/Users/bob/Desktop/Tiffany.jpg

512   merlino   2013 Feb 7, 1:48am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

You guys must have been burned real bad!
I may be an exemption but I have been happily married to an american woman for 15 years and we met when we were 14 years old. We have two young kids and we still have date nights and we try to dress nice and have the butterflies. What else can one asked? Also, with tax season I realized how big interests and taxes deductions can be. Buying a new house has been the best move ever. it costs me 3000$ a month in a house that would cost easily 4500$ to rent. No brainer...

513   zzyzzx (8/8 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 7, 1:57am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Peter P says

If you don't like women in the US just head North. There is much to like aboot ladies in Canada.

This comment is useless without pics.

514   zzyzzx (8/8 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 7, 2:05am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Wiseman says

You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

515   FortWayne (13/13 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 7, 2:23am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Wiseman says

I got lucky. Second wife made up for all the pain of the first. Beautiful old school and brilliant. Did not want kids. For me she is perfect. And she is Canadian.

First thing you must remember, You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

You conflate adult priorities w/ childs needs.

If you let a child be raised by television set don't be surprised if they join a gang, do drugs, or turn homosexual. Children should receive priority and guidance, but you should still make time for your relationship with your wife, just as she should make time for you.

516   Ironman (97/100 = 97% civil)   2013 Feb 7, 2:26am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

zzyzzx says

Wiseman says

You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

Hey, one plus with kids is, she can go bitch at THEM instead of bitching at YOU!!

517   epitaph   2013 Feb 7, 2:43am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

FortWayne says

or turn homosexual.

Not sure if that was a joke or you are being serious.

518   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 9, 9:27am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

merlino says

You guys must have been burned real bad!

I may be an exemption but I have been happily married to an american woman for 15 years and we met when we were 14 years old. We have two young kids and we still have date nights and we try to dress nice and have the butterflies. What else can one asked? Also, with tax season I realized how big interests and taxes deductions can be. Buying a new house has been the best move ever. it costs me 3000$ a month in a house that would cost easily 4500$ to rent. No brainer...

Being burned isn't the issue. It's all about playing the odds.

There are good women in the United States who would certainly make excellent wives, however it's a numbers game. Do you want to marry into a culture where your odds of being happy are 40% or 80%?

519   New Renter   2013 Feb 9, 12:17pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

Mick Russom says

The greedy stuff you do, like live off the ill gotten rentier income scammed off the working class, is the reason you dont like American woman. The credit card using greedy selfish types.

The mirror is tough to be married to.

Naw, not really. I married a gem. It's the men and women who come into my office that give me insight.

I'll even concede that perhaps 40% of American chicks have potential to be good mates. However those odds suck in my opinion so I'm going to act accordingly.

As for you, I suggest you let go of some of your hate before it wrecks you.

As did I. We were together for the better part of a decade before we were married. We went through a lot of good time, bad times, and poor times. I think THAT is the best insurance one can take to making sure you are marrying one of the good ones.

Not sure about Iwog's statistics, but he does have a good point given >50% of marriages end in divorce now.

50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, according to Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri.

According to enrichment journal on the divorce rate in America:

The divorce rate in America for first marriage is 41%
The divorce rate in America for second marriage is 60%
The divorce rate in America for third marriage is 73%

http://www.divorcerate.org/

520   MsBennet   2013 Feb 9, 12:22pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

zzyzzx says

Wiseman says

You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)ome

Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

521   Oxygen   2013 Feb 9, 12:31pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Wiseman says

/Users/bob/Desktop/Tiffany.jpg

lol

522   New Renter   2013 Feb 9, 12:47pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

MsBennet says

zzyzzx says

Wiseman says

You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)ome

Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

I take it you are not familiar with the boomerangs?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boomerang_Generation

523   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 9, 1:22pm  ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

MsBennet says

When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

Unless you're a woman. Then you can have an abortion, adopt out, or simply abandon a child at a police or fire station anonymously. Women have unlimited ways of simply walking away from their 18-year responsibility. All legal.

Men have no rights whatsoever and at the moment of conception they lose their rights to self-determination. American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

524   New Renter   2013 Feb 9, 1:44pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

With the rest of the world even more hostile to women...

525   lostand confused (10/10 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 9, 1:46pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

New Renter says

iwog says



American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.


With the rest of the world even more hostile to women...

Two wrongs don't make a right .

526   lostand confused (10/10 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 9, 1:48pm  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

MsBennet says

When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's
only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into
this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of
your universe for that amount of time at least.

Same for a woman. When a girl turns 18, she becomes a woman- an equal person who is responsible for herself and her decisions. Not rely on a man to take care of her for life-that is a husband, not a daddy. The laws need to change to reflect the current reality of equality.

527   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 9, 10:04pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

New Renter says

iwog says

American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

With the rest of the world even more hostile to women...

I don't live in the rest of the world however I would argue that in many nations, women enjoy freedom and an equal share of responsibility.

528   Eliza   2013 Feb 10, 12:52am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

The reality of equality may not exist in the real world. When people marry, their priorities mix. If she, or he, is a lagging spouse, moving to support their spouse's career goals, then their post-divorce options are not equal. If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances. If someone prioritizes family and their spouse's career, then they do really need to be compensated for what they gave up.

529   Reality   2013 Feb 10, 1:36am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Many females make a career out of roosting the nest by choice. In fact, I had to pay my ex-wife with an extra allowance to incentivise her to keep working outside the family, that's on top of hiring two full-time nannies working in two shifts so she could keep a part time consulting job in her field that paid very well.

That being said, I don't find it especially objectionable to have the divorce laws somewhat tilted in favor of women: women have much shorter marketable shelf life. When a man and a woman get married in their mid to late 20's, the woman's market value on average is much higher than the man's simply due to her youth and sex appeal (another way of saying how the male population is hard wired). After 10 years of marriage, by the time of their late 30's, the woman's shelf life will have nearly expired as far as finding life time mates is concerned whereas the man is still quite marketable, perhaps even more marketable than 10 years earlier if he has made something of himself.

Back to the original poster: if you want the marriage to last, spoil her on little things but always let her know who's in charge on important decisions in your lives. Despite all the talks of gender equality, women want men whom they can look up to. It's hard to do when your ages are really close, but try to remember that she will get bored and leave you when you suplicate her too much and let her be in control of you (and yes she will try instinctively without even intentionally doing it). Haven't you noticed how many women want little puppies and kitties? They always want a new one after having had the old one for a few years. Don't become one of her house broken pets. Otherwise, you might be the nicest man in the world, but people only appreciate that which they have lost . . . that applies to woman as well as to man.

Eliza says

The reality of equality may not exist in the real world. When people marry, their priorities mix. If she, or he, is a lagging spouse, moving to support their spouse's career goals, then their post-divorce options are not equal. If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances. If someone prioritizes family and their spouse's career, then they do really need to be compensated for what they gave up.

530   MsBennet   2013 Feb 10, 1:46am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

MsBennet says

When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

Unless you're a woman. Then you can have an abortion, adopt out, or simply abandon a child at a police or fire station anonymously. Women have unlimited ways of simply walking away from their 18-year responsibility. All legal.

Men have no rights whatsoever and at the moment of conception they lose their rights to self-determination. American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

531   lostand confused (10/10 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 1:48am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Eliza says

The reality of equality may not exist in the real world. When people marry, their priorities mix. If she, or he, is a lagging spouse, moving to support their spouse's career goals, then their post-divorce options are not equal. If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances. If someone prioritizes family and their spouse's career, then they do really need to be compensated for what they gave up.

That is a choice. I work mostly in IT and have worked in many parts of the country. For some reason, I have had more women bosses than men-very capabale women with kids and families, who have managed to juggle everything and still rise. Yes some were divorced and remarried, others took a lower level job for a while till the kids grew up and then climbed back. If they can do it, then the ones who choose to stay at home are making a choice and should not be rewarded for that. In today's world, you have washing machines, vacuum cleaners, cars, ready made food, clothes, 24/7 electricity and maybe 1 or 2 kids. It is not like back then when you popped 13 kids, had to gather firewood, milk the cows, tend to the harvest, keep enough food stored for the winter , cook and clean and take care of all 13 kids.

You asked for equality and got it-now act like an equal. Can't have your cake and eat it too. Today's divorce and bizarre child support laws does not encourage women to be independendant. There is great dignity in working for yourself and earning your own money and contributing equally.

532   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 1:50am  ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Eliza says

If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances

I don't have any problem with the state of divorce in the early 1950s. What I find abhorrent and vile are the following. They have no business in a free society and should be exterminated:

1. Spousal support of any kind for any reason if there are no children.
2. No fault divorce.
3. Child support obligations for an unmarried male under all circumstances.
4. Laws that allow a woman to abandon all responsibility for children while holding men accountable.
5. Rape convictions where there is no evidence other than the personal testimony of the two involved.

No doubt 5 needs clarification.

5. In the United States, a man is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I hold that no matter how believable the woman is at a rape trial, it is a legal impossibility to EVER prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt if the only evidence is he-said, she-said. The fact that there are men serving time for rape convictions in cases where the "victim" hasn't even taken the stand is a sick atrocity and a horrible indictment of this country. Sex crimes are the modern incarnation of the Salem Witch Trials.

533   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 1:52am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

MsBennet says

Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

That is really not the point. Why does the law give a woman multiple ways to abandon all responsibility towards her children while FORCING men to be responsible for nearly two decades?

Wasn't slavery abolished?

534   New Renter   2013 Feb 10, 2:05am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

I don't live in the rest of the world

You may not realize it but the rest of the world is coming to you:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2055445,00.html

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/29/alleged-honor-killing-suspect-yaser-said-could-be-hiding-in-plain-sight-as-new/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Shaima_Alawadi

iwog says

however I would argue that in many nations, women enjoy freedom and an equal share of responsibility.

Which probably amounts to 1/1000th of the world population while the "hostile to women" is a FAR larger population.

535   New Renter   2013 Feb 10, 2:58am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

MsBennet says

Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

That is really not the point. Why does the law give a woman multiple ways to abandon all responsibility towards her children while FORCING men to be responsible for nearly two decades?

Wasn't slavery abolished?

Probably because it has been even easier for a man to abandon all responsibility. Granted with cheap, accurate paternity testing it is no longer so easy for men to run away.

Some men have found their own way of handling things:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/california-dad-cameron-brown-hurled-daughter-4-cliff-avoid-child-support-prosecutor-article-1.426186

http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/add_images.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208216/Man-29-killed-ex-girlfriend-26-burned-baby-boy-child-support-payments.html

http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/crime/Man-killed-his-ex-over-child-support

http://www.cbs8.com/story/11457118/man-who-killed-woman-and-baby-to-avoid-child-support-gets-life-term

These stories do make a strong case for reform. They make a stronger case for women to not have children with psychopaths.

536   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 3:20am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

New Renter says

Probably because it has been even easier for a man to abandon all responsibility. Granted with cheap, accurate paternity testing it is no longer so easy for men to run away.

I couldn't disagree more unless you're talking about 50 years ago. Genetic testing has been around since 1985 and prior to that the presumption of parenthood was forced on men who were married regardless of who the actual father was.

As for your list of criminal acts, I don't think lunatics are relevant.

Women have ALWAYS had a remedy anyway: Marriage. Men should have zero responsibility towards unwanted children in the exact same way that women do unless there's a marriage contract guaranteeing otherwise.

New Renter says

Which probably amounts to 1/1000th of the world population while the "hostile to women" is a FAR larger population.

I'm sorry I simply don't agree with you. Islamic nations have well known discrimination issues against women however I don't see this in South America, most of Asia, and Eastern Europe.

Women vote, hold property, make contracts, and are the presumed guardians of young children. The difference is that they are held accountable for their reckless behavior.

537   New Renter   2013 Feb 10, 4:15am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

I'm sorry I simply don't agree with you. Islamic nations have well known discrimination issues against women however I don't see this in South America, most of Asia, and Eastern Europe.

Around the world at least one woman in every three has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime. Every year, violence in the home and the community devastates the lives of millions of women. Gender-based violence kills and disables as many women between the ages of 15 and 44 as cancer, and its toll on women's health surpasses that of traffic accidents and malaria combined.1 Violence against women is rooted in a global culture of discrimination which denies women equal rights with men and which legitimizes the appropriation of women's bodies for individual gratification or political ends.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/women-s-rights/violence-against-women/violence-against-women-information

India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Bride burning is still widely practiced:
http://www.examiner.com/article/bride-burning-india-pakistan-and-bangladesh-is-acceptable-murder

Africa: Rape:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1906000,00.html

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0512/Shocking-Congo-rape-statistics-show-husbands-not-just-soldiers-rebels-perpetuate-the-problem

China, India, Caucuses: Sex selective infanticide:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-selective_infanticide

538   Dr Strangelove   2013 Feb 10, 4:18am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

"First thing you must remember, You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be) "

In response to the above, I would suggest ANY Male considering marriage to take a long, careful look at the woman they're thinking of marrying and ask themselves the following critically important question...

Does this woman feel having children is part of our relationship together, or is our relationship (to her) part of us having children?

Just my .02

DOC

539   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 4:30am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

New Renter says

Around the world at least one woman in every three has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime.

I reject this statistic. "Coerced into sex" especially. Women do not get to share the same freedoms as men and then pretend they are innocent delicate little flowers who succumb to the wiles of men when they accidentally make a poor choice of sex partners. There are only two categories and zero grey areas: Forcible rape and consensual sex. Anything else is an attempt to divert responsibility of bad decision making to a man.

As for women who are physically abused, I don't know of many nations on earth that would allow a man convicted of physical violence to escape unpunished. Men having more physical strength than women is an unfortunate reality of biology, not a societal construct to guarantee women are victims.

New Renter says

Violence against women is rooted in a global culture of discrimination which denies women equal rights with men and which legitimizes the appropriation of women's bodies for individual gratification or political ends.

I'm sorry but I cannot accept this either. If the subject is women's rights, then we should be talking about those equal rights that women are not afforded in various countries...........NOT ABUSE! Unless abuse is legal, it is a separate issue with separate solutions.

As for women's bodies, men will never ever ever ever ever objectify women for individual gratification and political ends as much as women objectify themselves for individual gratification and political ends. Prostitution is a problem because so many women choose it. Revealing clothing is on the wish list of every teenage girl. Even in the Western World, getting a handle on girls sexting nude photos of themselves all over the place is an impossible task. Again we see basic biology being used as some sort of argument that women are being discriminated against. I do not accept it.

Almost everything on your list is illegal and prosecuted in nations where it is a problem.

540   MsBennet   2013 Feb 10, 4:41am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

iwog says

MsBennet says

Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

That is really not the point. Why does the law give a woman multiple ways to abandon all responsibility towards her children while FORCING men to be responsible for nearly two decades?

Wasn't slavery abolished?

It is the "point" I believe. Men are not forced and cannot be forced in many cases to give 50/50.

541   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 4:46am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

MsBennet says

It is the "point" I believe. Men are not forced and cannot be forced in many cases to give 50/50.

I don't care if it's 50/50 or 99/1. The fact that men are forced to give up one penny of their income for an 18 year period while women are afforded multiple ways to simply walk away and disappear is a sick atrocity and should not be tolerated here by anyone with a shred of morality.

Day of the pregnancy test:

Female: I can do anything I want, even after the baby is born. I'm the princess!!
Male: I'm fucked and have no more control of my life.

This is not acceptable.

542   anon595   2013 Feb 10, 4:46am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

There are so many disturbed and uninformed comments in this thread that I barely know where to start.

Here's one: divorce rate for 1st marriages between 2 that are highly educated and marry later in life is fairly low. Something like 20%, though happy to see the real stat.Factor in 2 that came from intact families and it improves even more.

To me that points to more success with marriages of equals, more mature than the typical couple, and people that have evidence that marriage has ups and downs but usually works when the deck is stacked correctly.

Marriage with someone from a third world is only successful because the woman had few other options and is making the best of it.

543   anon595   2013 Feb 10, 4:58am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Denying women are raped and abused at rates far greater than men smacks of fox news reporting during the election.

Because it is so hard to prove, it is rarely reported or prosecuted, especially in other countries. Haven't you been reading about India this past month?

544   anon595   2013 Feb 10, 5:02am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

And children need to be someone's priority after they are born. They don't raise themselves.

You want your wife to continue to treat you as her priority? You get what you give.

545   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 5:02am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

anon595 says

Marriage with someone from a third world is only successful because the woman had few other options and is making the best of it.

This is nonsense. I have a relative who is president of the Eastern European "mail order brides" club in Southern California. Foreign wives who are married to American men are extraordinarily happy. Furthermore they can cook, clean, and take care of the children while these skills are practically banned in the USA.

anon595 says

Here's one: divorce rate for 1st marriages between 2 that are highly educated and marry later in life is fairly low. Something like 20%, though happy to see the real stat.Factor in 2 that came from intact families and it improves even more.

The divorce rate for 1st time marriages is around 40%. The rate for miserable sexless marriages, marriages where one partner dies before divorce, marriages that are lifelong separations, and marriages for the sake of political and professional necessity are unknown.

Basically the odds suck. While the laws are so abhorrently stacked against men, they should think long and hard before risking their happiness on marriage here.

546   anon595   2013 Feb 10, 5:05am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Denying facts doesnt make them any less true. I'm done arguing with an uneducated troll.

547   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 5:07am  ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

anon595 says

Denying women are raped and abused at rates far greater than men smacks of fox news reporting during the election.

No one did this.

anon595 says

And children need to be someone's priority after they are born. They don't raise themselves.

There is a waiting list for adoptions and this issue is fake and disingenuous. The problem is NEVER finding suitable parents and support for a new baby.

What women want is total unhindered freedom to do whatever the fuck they want when they become pregnant with no responsibility or liability whatsoever.

Well guess what! Women have accomplished it and can simply kill their fetus, abandon their baby, or force men and society to pay her to take care of it regardless of how she behaves.

548   iwog (84/84 = 100% civil)   2013 Feb 10, 5:08am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

anon595 says

Denying facts doesnt make them any less true. I'm done arguing with an uneducated troll.

You actually didn't argue anything. You made a series of blind assertions then left.

« First     « Previous     Comments 509-548 of 668     Next »     Last »

Watch comments by email

home   top   users  
housing crash   thunderdome   sexy pix   site suggestions  
best comments   ad hominem comment jail   random post   patrick.net on twitter  
about   contact  
please recommend patrick.net to your boss