patrick.net

 
  forgot password?   register

#housing #investing #politics more»
735,516 comments in 75,664 posts by 10,906 registered users, 7 online now: BoomAndBustCycle, errc, iwog, junkmail, Rin, Strategist, Tim Aurora

new post

Remember That $83 Billion Bank Subsidy? We Weren't Kidding

By Patrick   2013 Feb 26, 10:09am   377 views   2 comments   watch (0)   quote      

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-24/remember-that-83-billion-bank-subsidy-we-weren-t-kidding.html

U.S. banks receive a taxpayer subsidy worth $83 billion a year has generated some, um, discussion. It's a big number, and the subsidy is a big issue for the banks. How did we get there? To recap, the largest banks can borrow money at a lower rate because creditors assume the government, on behalf of taxpayers, will rescue them in an emergency.

Comments 1-2 of 2     Last »

1   errc   452/459 = 98% civil   2013 Feb 26, 10:23am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote    

But patrick, we had to bail out the 1%, and at such small costs, we should all be thankful,,,this was a bargain

Just imagine how much worse off everything would be right now, had we not saved the system?

2   curious2   528/528 = 100% civil   2013 Feb 26, 10:40am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote    

That particular subsidy is in addition to $1T/year of QE, plus ZIRP, all to prop up the malefactors that bankrupted the institutions they had been entrusted to run. If you prop up the one group of people who have proven they can't run a bank, and keep them in charge of everything, it would be insane to expect better economic results. I liked the comments below the article, from people praising their local community banks, where they got better rates than at the TBTF banks.

Comments 1-2 of 2     Last »

users   about   suggestions   contact  
topics   random post   best comments   comment jail  
patrick's 40 proposals  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker:

top   bottom   home