patrick.net

  new post
register or log in

patrick.net's 40 proposals »

10,747 registered users, 5 online now: just any guy, Straw Man, tovarichpeter, tr6, WookieMan

Small company with balls counter-sues Craigslist over listing data

By Patrick (392/392 = 100% civil)   2013 Mar 26, 8:02am   ↑ like   ↓ dislike   1 link   935 views   7 comments   watch (0)   share   quote  

http://3taps.com/papers/3taps-answer-counterclaim.pdf

To the extent that there is anything genuinely “unique” about craigslist’s free ads, it is because they are the works of users who place their own ads, write their own copy, and own or control the goods or services that they — not craigslist — advertise. 3taps denies that these works of others can be asserted by craigslist as its own.

Comments 1-7 of 7     Last »

1   epitaph (1/1 = 100% civil)   2013 Mar 26, 8:44am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

This is just a publicity stunt that has no merit or legal grounds.

2   CashWillCrash   2013 Mar 26, 9:50am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Well, they got sued by Craigslist and first and now they are just filing counter claim. A little bit too much to read though...

“The basis of our antitrust counterclaim and defense against Craigslist’s baseless lawsuit is simple: public facts are public property – openly and equally available to businesses and consumers”
– Greg Kidd, Founder/ CEO

3   epitaph (1/1 = 100% civil)   2013 Mar 26, 9:56am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

CashWillCrash says

Well, they got sued by Craigslist and first and now they are just filing counter claim. A little bit too much to read though...

“The basis of our antitrust counterclaim and defense against Craigslist’s baseless lawsuit is simple: public facts are public property – openly and equally available to businesses and consumers”

– Greg Kidd, Founder/ CEO

That would be a great argument if Craigslist wasn't a private company.

4   Dan8267 (277/280 = 98% civil)   2013 Mar 30, 11:43am  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

The way I see it is that if you publish anything on the Internet, you don't get to deny people copying or linking to it. That's the entire purpose and nature of the Internet: to spread information. If you want the information to be private and controlled, don't put it on the Internet.

You can't take the aspects of the Internet you want and stop the other aspects from operating. The Internet is only a success, and thus appealing to you as an advertising vehicle, because information flows freely to it. Those aspects you want to stop working are exactly the aspects that made the Internet so damn appealing to you in the first place.

I'd vote for 3taps.com in this case.

By the way, when did Craigslist become
1. Profitable
2. Evil

I thought the founder Craig didn't care about money and refused lucrative offers to sell Craiglist in order to keep it free and a public service. Hell, how does Craiglist even make money?

An on another note, isn't Craiglist like the crappiest classifies website one could possibly write. I mean, even in 1994, I say way the hell better sites.

5   curious2 (69/69 = 100% civil)   2013 Mar 30, 3:48pm  ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Dan8267 says

Hell, how does Craiglist even make money?

Craig's List makes money advertising for realtors and charging employers to place job listings. I can't help suspecting someone there might also be getting a cut from spammers, because the site is flooded with overposts and "keyword" lists that make search results meaningless.

6   Patrick (392/392 = 100% civil)   2013 Mar 31, 2:46am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  

Dan8267 says

The way I see it is that if you publish anything on the Internet, you don't get to deny people copying or linking to it. That's the entire purpose and nature of the Internet: to spread information. If you want the information to be private and controlled, don't put it on the Internet.

I agree, as long as the source gets credited. I'd have no problem crediting Craiglist for data that the public entered on their site as long as I can re-use the data to add value.

7   Dan8267 (277/280 = 98% civil)   2013 Mar 31, 5:43am  ↑ like   ↓ dislike   quote   top   bottom   home   share  


I'd have no problem crediting Craiglist for data that the public entered on their site as long as I can re-use the data to add value.

Of course the ETL process is much more complicated than that. Scrappers will search tons of sites including Cragslist, Zillow, rentals, mynewplace, etc. Anything even remotely a good source, and the criteria for good is very low indeed.

Once you've aggregated all the data, you clean it up, transform it, combine the data from all sources into load tables. Then a final pass on the load tables, combining them with official sources like HUD and property appraisal (tax appraisal) records, and only then do you load the final results into your production database.

By then, the information doesn't clearly come from any particular source. So the best you can do is just say some of the data came from the following sources...

The point is that it's not as simple as copy-n-paste from a website and quoting it like you would in a high school report. Data is kind of like pink slime.


Hmmm, data.

Comments 1-7 of 7     Last »

Watch comments by email

home   top   users   about   contact  
#investing   #housing   #politics   #humor  
housing crash   thunderdome   sexy pix   site suggestions  
best comments   ad hominem comment jail   patrick.net on twitter   random post  
please recommend patrick.net to your enemies