patrick.net

leoj707 says

Yeah, you just got to get over there and kick to interlopers out of your paradise, then things will flourish.

They were doing better without central government in the 1990's, better than under the central governments both before and since. The case of Somalia is not even hypothetical, but factual history, and a very recent one. If you want to prove somehow having a strong central government is always better for any and all places in the world, you have gotta find some sample case other than Somalia.

Reality says

The Roman road building techniques were even more similar to how the Britons built roads in the first century BC before Roman arrival, duh!

I understand that you did not follow and read the link I, but you did not even read the expert that I posted.

leoj707 says

When the Romans arrived in England, they found no roads to use. Instead they had to make do with tracks used by the Britons. It was not unusual for these tracks to be in very poor condition as they were usually on high ground and open to all types of weather.

While I understand that you definition of "road" could include an unimproved open meadow --as the rest of the English speaking world defines the word-- there were not roads in England before the Romans arrived. On top of that when the Romans left the English did not use the Roman roads.

Reality says

Find me evidence of Romans using asphalt and diesel powered earth movers and rollers.

LOL, I said technique! not materials!

Reality says

They were doing better without central government in the 1990's, better than under the central governments both before and since. The case of Somalia is not even hypothetical, but factual history, and a very recent one. If you want to prove somehow having a strong central government is always better for any and all places in the world, you have gotta find some sample case other than Somalia.

This discussion has been gone over ad nauseum in this forum I am not going to spend the time to reiterate arguments that.
1. You could easily find searching the posting history
2. You are going to promptly ignore

leoj707 says

I understand that you did not follow and read the link I, but you did not even read the expert that I posted.

That's because the info you cite is so out of date, it's not even funny. Here is the link to much more up to date info:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1366468/Roman-road-doubt-discovery-cobbled-built-100-years-invasion.html

I don't entirely blame you for buying into the claptrap nonsense that used to be taught in schools to glorify the Roman fascist state.

While I understand that you definition of "road" could include an unimproved open meadow --as the rest of the English speaking world defines the word-- there were not roads in England before the Romans arrived. On top of that when the Romans left the English did not use the Roman roads.

What kind of nonsense is that? Britain had significant trade with the Mediterranean since before the punic wars. Much of the tin in Mediterranean Bronze Age came from Britain. Do you honest think Britain supplied tin to the Med Bronze Age without any road commerce inland on Britain itself? You have way too much faith in reports written by the Roman equivalent of Haliburton and Bectel to get more imperial funding for "infrastructure" building in a newly conquered land.

LOL, I said technique! not materials!

Yes techniques. Do you think Romans pounded the road surface like Brits at the time did or like we do nowadays driving a diesel-powered roller? Do you think Romans poured dirt and rocks to form surface like the Britis of that time period did (and how it was done all the way through late 19th century for horse carriage traffic) or rolled hot asphalt like we do nowadays for automobiles? do you think Romans engineered their road surfaces based on a design centered around steel lettuce mats like we have been doing since WWII?

leoj707 says

This discussion has been gone over ad nauseum in this forum I am not going to spend the time to reiterate arguments that.
1. You could easily find searching the posting history
2. You are going to promptly ignore

Here is a link for you:

http://mises.org/daily/2701

Countries being ruined by attempts at centralizing government is actually quite common place: Aghanistan is another prime example.

Reality says

That's because the info you cite is so out of date, it's not even funny. Here is the link to much more up to date info:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1366468/Roman-road-doubt-discovery-cobbled-built-100-years-invasion.html

Awesome, thanks for the link. So, both the Briton's and Romans used similar techniques for building their roads as we use today.

Reality says

You have way too much faith in reports written by the Roman equivalent of Haliburton and Bectel to get more funding for "infrastructure" building in a newly conquered land.

Not really, given the link you sent I am more than willing to update my thinking on Briton's pre-Roman use of roads.

Reality says

Yes techniques. Do you think Romans pounded the road surface like Brits at the time did or like we do nowadays driving a diesel-powered roller? Do you think Romans poured dirt and rocks like the Britis of that time period did or rolled hot asphalt like we do nowadays?

Yes techniques. Different tools, and materials, but similar engineering techniques.

Matt.BayArea says

Bap33 says

The pyramids were built. That is the entire amount known about the pyramids. Everything else is a guess.

I like your skepticism!
But ... aren't you a religious person? Why apply this sort of skepticism to the pyramids, where there's various pieces of evidence that hint at a history that does not require we resort to mysticism to explain the gaps, but not to the bible? While the bible is also a form of historical evidence, it contains all kinds of crazy things that sound very improbable, impossible to prove (or, conveniently, disprove), and lie well outside the scope of our experiences (assuming you yourself haven't seen people part oceans or walk on water or return from the dead without medical intervention, etc etc).

Just curious, sorry if I'm confusing you for someone else (I seem to recall some religious comments from you)

I do not qualify for "religious" in most circles. I know God is real. The Hebrew God, and Jesus, and all that jaz. It's all real. But, religious has me sitting in a room singing with folks every week, or kneeling towards mecca and killing babies on buses in Isreal .... I don't do those religious things.

Would you expand on how/why you connected my comment - that man has no idea what or how or why or when the pyramids came to be - to my knowing there is God?

Thank you for proving my point that Fascist instincts are quite bi-partisan.

APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says

They forgot to remove the offending population that was squatting on a valuable resource. President Bachmann won't make that mistake.