Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »


Survey: Fewer Men Paying for Sex

By zzyzzx follow zzyzzx   2013 Nov 4, 3:47am 2,185 views   8 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 3 (UPI) -- A poll of men in the United States found fewer of them have paid for or received payment for sex than in decades past.

In several surveys conducted from 1991 to 1996, about 17 percent of respondents said they have either paid for or had received payment for sex at least once in their lives, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Similar surveys conducted between 2006 and 2012 found that number dropped to 13.2 percent.

If fewer men are paying for sex, "it's because they don't have to," said Christine Milrod, an independent researcher and sex therapist from Los Angeles. "They can have sex for free."

Other researchers said it is possible men are becoming less likely to admit they have paid for sex.

"City after city, state after state, there have been changes in the law that increase penalties for paying for sex," said Ronald Weitzer, a George Washington University sociology professor. "It might be the growing punitive climate that's affecting these numbers."

1   Shaman   ignore (2)   2018 Aug 11, 3:23pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Single men with any looks or game have the wide world of online dating to score plenty of willing ass. These girls consider sex to be an audition for a girlfriend.

Single men without that or men who are just poor or lazy have endless porn available.

It’s kind of a terrible situation for women right now. Unless a man specifically desires children and a family, they have little incentive to settle down.
2   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Aug 11, 3:33pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

zzyzzx says
A poll of men in the United States found fewer of them...received payment for sex than in decades past.

Did Fred Garvin retire?
3   Ceffer   ignore (4)   2018 Aug 11, 3:50pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I watched in bemusement as a young male relative smugly went through his 'friends with benefits' stage, thinking he was getting near free ass from a procession of girl friends.

Then, these women wound up pursuing, stalking, hectoring, undermining, attacking, and covertly sabotaging him in a variety of ways. He finally married one. It's the dismal fate of the heterosexual male to be brought to ground and sucked dry by the female fang eventually. Even the wealthy celebrities being fire hosed by wall to wall ass succumb (and wind up paying for it). It is Idée Fixe in the genetic programming tango.

Nowadays, the heterosexual female has been painted into a corner largely of her own making, since the information age has blown her cover. Nonetheless, it takes a crafty and resourceful male to avoid the pitfalls. Or, a brutal and indifferent sociopath/psychopath.

If you are heterosexual male, you always pay for it one way or another, so just get used to it.
4   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Aug 11, 4:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

feminazis and the democrat laws against men scare the hell out of any man with assets. A man worth nothing can do what he wants-have as many kids as he wants and just enjoy life.
5   cali   ignore (0)   2018 Aug 11, 4:46pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
It’s kind of a terrible situation for women right now. Unless a man specifically desires children and a family, they have little incentive to settle down.

True. This is the inevitable result of hard-core feminism, which is founded on the radical notion that women are men.

One of many ways that women are harmed by feminism is by being encouraged to act like men sexually. Men are programmed to be very quick to have sex, for the logical reasons that they themselves cannot get pregnant, and are in fact also less likely to pick up venereal diseases. It's low risk, evolutionarily speaking, and potentially high reward in terms of offspring. Men who were quick to have sex simply left many more descendants. And now men have a cornucopia of free poon, provided by feminist indoctrination of young girls to go out and fuck like men do. So it's the best of all worlds for top men, as long as they avoid all the snares and don't commit to any one woman for too long.

Women have a much higher penalty for being promiscuous, partly because they can get pregnant and get diseases, but also because no man wants to commit to a promiscuous woman, because then he can never be sure the children are actually his own. Women always know that their children are their own, but men do not, so they have a strong motive to avoid marrying slutty women.

Now that all women are slutty (at least all feminist women), all men have a very strong motive to avoid marrying them. Feminists have been hoist by their own petard.
6   HEYYOU   ignore (46)   2018 Aug 11, 5:06pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If a man is married he is paying for sex.

My alcoholic father died when I was 14.
I asked my mother years later, why she didn't remarry. Her response: "I don't need a man."
A couple of well to do men would have married her. She died financially independent having worked for herself.
My mother & aunt were tougher than a lot of so called men that I know.
7   clambo   ignore (5)   2018 Aug 13, 2:07pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I got a little perspective on this subject since my neighbor who is 30 told me what his life is like.

His age group seems to treat "hooking up" as casual enough. This may or may not lead to a real relationship. He had several females who saw him and nobody yelled if either partner stopped the seeing the other.

I met a female a year ago who seemed to want a casual arrangement with me. She did want to be wined and dined however.

My perspective is changing because on the one hand I am less interesting to females as I get older, but on the other more interesting since my net worth is higher than when I was younger. I am feeling like they all want something from me one way or another so I just have to decide how much is too much.

Someone may have asked me to take her on a short cruise to the Bahamas, and I say I will take us to eat at The Woods restaurant instead.

You can bet a guy in San Francisco doesn't have to pay for girls although it still costs money to date, bars and restaurants can eat up you wallet.
8   Rin   ignore (4)   2018 Aug 13, 2:10pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

What kind of ridiculous poll is this?! Seeing hoes is ILLEGAL for much of the United States, to begin with. Who'd want to say 'yes' when it's clear that such a thing can get one in trouble in Uncle Sam.

And it's true, a guy can easily drop 1000s on a chick, taking her to top restaurants, Sedona, and other locales to get laid. In my book, that guy has overpaid for a boink.

Please, go up to Montreal and run the same survey and include the American tourists. I'm pretty sure you won't see a stark drop off.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions