by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 54 - 93 of 169 Next » Last » Search these comments
Holograms??? The planes were real!
I sense some sarcasm here. But the planes were real--they were controlled remotely from outer space. You don't deny the alien connection, do you?
Still can't shoot down 100 Kingfish Missiles launched from 270 degrees around the compass.
Following President Biden's recently signed executive order for the declassification of many of the remaining documents relating to the Saudi role in the 9/11 attacks, the Justice Dept. on Saturday night released its first one - a heavily redacted 16-page report from April 2016.
While not yet considered a smoking gun in terms of proving high level Saudi foreknowledge and complicity, it does contain new information on a Saudi student in California at the time, Omar al-Bayoumi, who is shown to have aided two of the 9/11 hijackers while enjoying close ties with Saudi diplomats. The memo ultimately shines more light on what appears Saudi intelligence continuing contact with some of the hijackers leading up to the 9/11 attacks.
But none of this means we have to rely on stupid evidence for a conspiracy and live in a fantasy world.
People are actually saying September 11 WASN'T AS BAD as the January 6 Capitol riot. Seriously.
Joe Biden's Submissive -- and Highly Revealing -- Embrace of Saudi Despots
Biden's immediate abandonment of his 2020 vow to turn the Saudis into "pariahs," and his increasing support for the regime, shows the core deceit of U.S. propaganda.
When news broke that President Biden was planning a trip to Saudi Arabia to visit the crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (known as MbS), members of his party were horrified. Representative Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was especially disturbed and recommended the White House cancel it outright. “I wouldn’t go. I wouldn’t shake his hand,” Schiff told CBS on June 5. “This is someone who butchered an American resident, cut him up into pieces in the most terrible and pre-meditated way.”
That resident was Jamal Khashoggi, a former Saudi royal family insider who used his perch as a columnist at the Washington Post to raise awareness about the crown prince’s ruthless ways. Khashoggi would be caught in a Saudi government ruse, tricked into coming to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to sign marriage papers, only to be summarily killed and dismembered by hitmen close to MbS’s inner circle. President Biden, who promised to avenge the murder during his campaign, declassified the US intelligence community’s assessment of the killing a month after he was sworn in, laying responsibility on the kingdom’s de facto ruler.
Now, nearly a year and a half later, Biden is apparently forgetting about the whole “I’m going to turn Saudi Arabia into a pariah” thing. The official announcement of the president’s trip to the kingdom could come this week. Needless to say, the trip will be Biden’s most controversial. This is the same president who, after all, claims to be putting human rights at the center of US foreign policy. Opponents of the visit argue that a face-to-face with one of the world’s most notorious murderers is the very essence of hypocrisy. How can the world take Washington’s rhetoric about human rights seriously when US officials will jettison their own principles at the first opportunity?
A Case Study of Congressional Concealment
Reviewing the 29 redacted pages of the Joint Inquiry of 9/11 attacks.
On December of 2002, Congress published a report on its Inquiry. At first glance, this seemed an admirable example of our legislative branch doing its job for the American people. However, concerned citizens who read it—especially the relatives of Americans who died in the attacks—noticed that 29 pages of the report had been redacted because they contained “certain sensitive national security matters.”
Sensible readers will note that the whole point of the Inquiry was to ascertain WHY our intelligence and law enforcement had so catastrophically failed to protect our national security, so redacting 29 pages because they pertained “to sensitive national security matters” struck me as ridiculous. I immediately suspected that Congress was simply protecting influential “friends” and “allies” from embarrassment.
Relatives of 9/11 victims filed a FOIA request for the redacted pages, and after a 14-year legal contest, Congress was finally ordered to publish the document, which it did on Friday, July 15, 2016.
For years the redacted section had been referenced as “the 28 pages,” but the total number turned out to be 29. The key FINDING of the redacted section is as follows:
While in the United States, some of these September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from individuals who may be connected to the Saudi government. There is information, primarily from FBI sources, that at least two of those individuals were alleged by some to be Saudi intelligence officers.
One of the suspected intelligence officers was Osama Bassnan, who lived across the street from two of the hijackers when they resided in San Diego and was in close contact with many of their associates. According to the report:
Bassnan has many ties to the Saudi government, including past employment by the Saudi Arabian education mission. The FBI also received reports from individuals in the Muslim community alleging that Bessan might be a Saudi intelligence officer According to a CIA memo, Bassnan has reportedly received funding, and possibly a fake passport, from Saudi government officials, he and his wife have received financial support from the Saudi ambassador to the United States and his wife.
On at least one occasion, Bassnan received a check directly from Prince Bandar‘s account. According to the FBI, on May 14, 1998, Bassnan cashed the check from Bandar in the amount of $15,000. Bassnan’s wife also received at least one check directly from Bandar. She also received one additional check from Bandar’s wife which she cashed on January 8, 1998 for $10,000.
While such statements might pique someone’s curiosity to learn more about this connection between President Bush’s friend, Prince Bandar, and a suspected Saudi intelligence agent providing support for hijackers in San Diego, Congress wasn’t interested. As the Committees stated in their report:
It should be clear that this joint inquiry has made no final determinations as to the reliability or sufficiency of the information regarding these issues that we found contained in FBI and CIA documents.
U.S. mainstream media coverage of the release was minimal and it downplayed the significance of what was contained in the document. CNN’s report quoted Senators Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein:
Sens. Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein, the chair and top Democrat of the Senate Intelligence Committee, issued a statement that they agreed with the decision to declassify the report. But they cautioned, “These pages include unconfirmed allegations and raw reporting and have been the subject of conspiracy theories for years.”
Ain’t it funny how you will never discover the truth of a matter if you don’t investigate it? Not investigating also enables you to brand anyone who raises questions about the matter a “conspiracy theorist.”
The United States has repatriated a Saudi national to Saudi Arabia after keeping him behind bars in Guantanamo prison for 21 years over suspected involvement in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
In a statement on Wednesday, the Pentagon announced that it had released 48-year-old Saudi national Ghassan al-Sharbi and returned him to Saudi Arabia "subject to the implementation of a comprehensive set of security measures including monitoring, travel restrictions and continued information sharing."
Yes, Saudi's did it, but at this point I think it was with the active cooperation of the CIA.
He believes that the planes were holograms.
Can you offer one documented demonstration of a believable hologram which can convince witnesses (including video cameras) filming from 80 different angles? Or is this secret, black-ops technology which still hasn't seen the light of public viewing (other than on 9/11) for 13 years and counting?
By the way: Isn't it cheaper, and less risky, to simply hijack the planes as-is and fly them into the buildings? Why employ all manner of Buck Rogers non-existent technology if just flying real planes into the buildings will do the trick for less money? Are you a moron?
I usually know better than to argue with twoofers, since they will never, ever change their minds - except to change to a different conspiracy.
This hologram you can see from any angle.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/906292397041636?mibextid=6AJuK9&s=chYV2B&fs=e
inject a bunch of obvious bullshit into it,
What the heck guys.
The captain of a United Airlines flight that was supposed to depart on the morning of September 11, 2001, believes his plane might have been meant to be part of the terrorist attacks that day. Yeah, a fifth plane.
This is an airline captain saying this – not some basement-dwelling blogger or Dollar Store conspiracy theorist or something.
In a TMZ special called "9/11: The Fifth Plane," Captain Tom Mannello shares his suspicions about his Flight 23, a Boeing 767 scheduled to depart JFK Airport for L.A. at 9 a.m.
There's no question. It wasn't just Saudi Arabia and the CIA, but Mossad as well. It was 9/11 that set the stage for the US to be in war for 20 years. That was the main purpose of the false flag.
These wars have done INCREDIBLE damage to the United States with no benefit.
So was it SA or Boooosh whodunnit? I'm getting confused here.
It was Saudi Arabia, Israel, and US intelligence agencies that did 9/11.
...
It looks like the main purpose of 9/11 was to start up a "war on terror" which is of course unwinnable, to beef up spending on the military since the Cold War was gone. That didn't work out very well, which is why the US kept expanding NATO, overthrew Ukraine. They are jumping for JOY with Russia attacking Ukraine
So it's SA, Mossad, CIA and KGB then. The only logical conclusion here. Why did you try to obfuscate KGB role in this?
Declassified Guantanamo court filing suggests some 9/11 hijackers were CIA agents
What does the intelligence agency have to do with the suicide terrorist attack?
An explosive court filing from the Guantanamo Military Commission – a court considering the cases of defendants accused of carrying out the "9/11" terrorist attacks on New York – has seemingly confirmed the unthinkable.
The document was originally published via a Guantanamo Bay court docket, but while public, it was completely redacted. Independent researchers obtained an unexpurgated copy. It is an account by the Commission’s lead investigator, DEA veteran Don Canestraro, of his personal probe of potential Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, conducted at the request of the defendants’ lawyers.
Two of the hijackers were being closely monitored by the CIA and may, wittingly or not, have been recruited by Langley long before they flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.
OK, what was the angle, if it was really them?
(I have my theory on whodunnit with a very solid motive and benefits but I'd like to hear the SA version first.)
And that both parties look down on the public as incapable of handling the truth. As if the public is composed of children and the only adults are the elite.
Patrick says
And that both parties look down on the public as incapable of handling the truth. As if the public is composed of children and the only adults are the elite.
OR:
If the truth were known the elite would face the gallows.
So now that the government admits that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, when do we got the prosecution for treason and hanging of every scumbag official who covered it up, literally giving aid and comfort to the enemy?
Just In Time for 9/11 Anniversary, New York City Allows Islamic Call to Prayer Over Loudspeakers
Did the 9/11 hijackers and plotters succeed? Can it finally be said, nearly twenty-two years after they murdered nearly three thousand people in New York and Washington, that they have attained their objectives?
Back in 2003, Osama bin Laden wrote a letter to the American people in which he explained, “The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam.” Twenty years later, that very call will resound from loudspeakers all over the city that was his chief target on Sept. 11, 2001. (All the 9/11-was-an-inside-job types can find bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks here). New York Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday announced what Gothamist described as “new NYPD rules” that “will allow mosques in New York City to broadcast the Muslim call to prayer without a permit.”
SA is a red herring and nobody made a convincing case on how they supposedly benefited from 9/11.
SA is a red herring and nobody made a convincing case on how they supposedly benefited from 9/11.
David Chandler is best known in the 9/11 Truth Movement for proving that NIST lied in denying that Building 7 underwent freefall. Freefall is a literal smoking gun for controlled demolition. See David’s 6-part serial essay entitled Free Fall on Medium.com.
David has looked at the overall behavior of Building 7 as it comes down in freefall. Others have looked carefully at the structural details and whether it is possible for the building to come down the way it did due to natural causes. Most notable in this research is a project by Dr. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, who, with two graduate students, has constructed mathematical models in two different finite element analysis systems to simulate the behavior of the structure. (A quick summary of the conclusions is that fire could not have caused the observed failures.)
The FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, etc., along with all of the corrupt politicians need to be splintered into a thousand pieces and scattered to the winds.
« First « Previous Comments 54 - 93 of 169 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,247,479 comments by 14,880 users - 6DOF, anniecoyote, RedStar, stfu online now