by _ ➕follow (8) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 100 - 106 of 106 Search these comments
More competitive because they are sidestepping the government protection
Governments always follows technology, it takes time for them to figure out how to sink their claws into the new technology.
Ok, how is getting a radio call more efficient than getting a text? Where exactly is the savings? The only savings is using the app to automatically send out the dispatch without human intervention.
It eliminates the dispatcher and provides quicker services and holds the driver accountable, hence higher quality, faster service, for less money.
So once again you are making my argument for me. Technology is NET destroying jobs not creating them. How many programmers do you think it took to write the uber app? How many unemployed or soon to be unemployed taxi dispatchers do you think there are?
It is not a zero sum game. It is about the principle you choose to ignore that was pointed out to us by David Ricardo. Otherwise the farmers would still being looking for work from the early 1900s.
Stay in school kids!
Most succesful people were drop outs or had really bad grades.
Most succesful people were drop outs or had really bad grades
When we talk about the masses, we can't use anomaly's as the norm or even as a reference point to discuss about general education in relationship to a mass population pool
Hence why uneducated people in mass do worse than those who are education, this has always been the case when we look at the bigger picture of education economics
When we talk about the masses, we can't use anomaly's as the norm or even as a reference point to discuss about general education in relationship to a mass population pool
Hence why uneducated people in mass do worse than those who are education, this has always been the case when we look at the bigger picture of education economics
Wasn't referring to it on a massive scale. I apologize for not making that clear.
Here is a take from the Wall Street Journal on the missing 2.9 million from the peak of the housing bubble on ages 25-55 ( Prime Working Age Labor Force)
Why are more 25 to 55-year-olds out of the labor force? Mostly disability and school: http://on.wsj.com/1LLo3Ie
They have been talking about 10 million more on disability for some time. Thx O
They have been talking about 10 million more on disability for some time.
Disability payouts more for renting demand curve economics, ....
Home buyers tend to be college educated dual income or strong single income Americans, which for all the reasons mentioned in the article, just isn't that strong in this cycle
« First « Previous Comments 100 - 106 of 106 Search these comments
http://loganmohtashami.com/2015/09/24/why-mortgage-purchase-applications-are-near-an-all-time-low-when-adjusted-to-population/
As always economics has a equilibrium factor model to it. Each cycle is unique to it's own capacity, when you look at demographic economics from 1996 -2007
It explains a lot why the demand curve is soft from 2007-2019.
You can't just make up buyers, the supply had to be there and in this cycle it wasn't even a question.
#housing