1
0

Linda Tripp Breaks 20-Year Silence, Condemns Hillary Clinton Candidacy


 invite response                
2016 May 9, 8:42pm   15,675 views  39 comments

by indigenous   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

Linda Tripp, the woman who exposed Monica Lewinsky as Bill Clinton’s mistress but has remained silent the last twenty years about what she knew about Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave an exclusive interview to The Daily Mail in which she offered what she knew about Hillary Clinton that makes her unfit for the presidency.

Tripp sat outside the Oval Office the first three months of the Clinton Administration, then moved to an office directly adjacent to Hillary’s second floor West Wing office until Tripp left the administration. She told the Daily Mail that to Hillary, her election as president would “be part of a coronation instead of an election,” adding, “I think the most compelling thing about Hillary is that she will stop at nothing to achieve her end and that she views the public as plebeians easily seduced into believing her point of view.”

Tripp continued, “Hillary Clinton ruled the White House even as early as 1993 and every scandal that originated in the Clinton administration was the brainchild of Hillary. When I think of Hillary Clinton I think of a lingering taint of scandal and wrongdoing and, in my opinion, possible criminal activity.”

Tripp pointed out, “As is widely acknowledged, Hillary took care of all the ‘bimbo eruptions’ of which there were thousands in order to present to the world an electable candidate. In this endeavor she was ruthless. She destroyed women so that their stories never saw the light of day.” She noted that Hillary orchestrated the marginalizing of Gennifer Flowers, who said in 1992 that she and Bill Clinton had been lovers for 12 years.

Tripp, of course, was quite familiar with the Monica Lewinsky affair, and stated, “Hillary was not only aware of Monica Lewinsky, she ensured that Monica was removed from the White House and in the end went from being a lackluster First Lady with unimpressive approval numbers to wronged wife. Literally within the blink of an eye she propelled herself to First Victim status. This turned the corner for Hillary.”

Tripp pointed out that Hillary’s later career was predicated on her reaction to the Lewinsky affair. She said, “Women across the world could certainly understand her position of standing by her man, finding it admirable that she was working on her marriage, unaware that it was a charade. She has that particular scandal to thank for her Senate candidacy and election and for everything that followed.”

Still, Tripp insisted that the “bimbo issues” of Bill Clinton obscured the most important issue. She asserted, “In the case of Monica Lewinsky the story was never really about Monica or Linda Tripp. It was about subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice and a true abuse of power on the part of a sitting president. That should have been the story. It never was. And so it gave Monica her much needed fifteen minutes and it took the rest of us along with it but the actual crux of the entire issue escaped most. And now the very person who orchestrated that cover up and all the other cover ups over the years including those surfacing today is running for president of the United States.”

Tripp took time to discuss the Whitewater scandal, which broke in 1994 and revolved around real-estate purchases involving the Clintons in 1978 when Bill was attorney general of Arkansas. Tripp said what she saw the Clintons do in 1994 “was not spin. It was lying to the American people knowingly and doing it routinely.”

In 2001, Tripp told CNN Host Larry King that Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vince Foster, former deputy White House counsel, to resolve the Waco standoff problem in 1993. Former House Waco investigator T. March Bell charged that Hillary pressured Attorney General Janet Reno through Deputy Attorney General Webb Hubbell to initiate the attack on the Waco compound in 1993 that left 86 people dead, including children. Bell charged that Hillary orchestrated the action because the Waco standoff was dominating the news.

Tripp concluded about Hillary Clinton, “I watched her on countless occasions blatantly lie to the American people and knowingly lie.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/29/linda-tripp-breaks-20-year-silence-condemns-hillary-clinton-candidacy/

Comments 1 - 39 of 39        Search these comments

1   lostand confused   2016 May 10, 5:11am  

This will be a fun election!!

2   HEY YOU   2016 May 10, 8:23am  

Hope some quiet Republican condemns & denounces G.W.Bush & his ilk for allowing 9/11.

3   Tenpoundbass   2016 May 10, 10:33am  

I'm sure this all in Donald Trump Dossier he had compiled on her.
Hillary's whooping cough is about to much worse.

4   tatupu70   2016 May 10, 10:38am  

Tenpoundbass says

I'm sure this all in Donald Trump Dossier he had compiled on her.

Hillary's whooping cough is about to much worse.

You guys make me laugh. You don't think there is a dossier that's 3X as thick on Trump?

Organized crime in the US. Organized crime in Russia. Trump University scam. His business "successes" only possible because of Fred. Would be bankrupt and penniless except for the bailout he received. Racist landlord. And we haven't even started on his problems with women and minorities.

I have a feeling this could be the most negative Presidential race in a long time.

5   anonymous   2016 May 10, 11:03am  

Oh yea there's tons of dirt waiting in the wings on Trump. Hillary will succeed where all the rest of the GOP failed

Lmao

6   tatupu70   2016 May 10, 11:04am  

errc says

Oh yea there's tons of dirt waiting in the wings on Trump. Hillary will succeed where all the rest of the GOP failed

Did the other candidates even try though? They gave up attacking him pretty early on.

Going negative won't affect the 40% of Republicans that are with him to the death, but this isn't the primary anymore. It will affect the Independents and Dems that he needs to win.

7   indigenous   2016 May 10, 3:59pm  

The point is that Hillary did it under the auspices of the public sector, which has literally allowed her to get away with murder literally.

8   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 May 10, 4:09pm  

tatupu70 says

You guys make me laugh. You don't think there is a dossier that's 3X as thick on Trump?

No, he's been a public figure for 35 years and a tabloid regular since Marla Maples talking about how the Don has big hands in bed.

I'd be pretty surprised if anybody can dig up something seriously new, negative and controversial on Trump.

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20116980,00.html

9   tatupu70   2016 May 10, 4:16pm  

thunderlips11 says

I'd be pretty surprised if anybody can dig up something seriously controversial on Trump.

Really? I listed like 5 things in my post. Organized crime? Charity fraud? Discriminating as a landlord? That's the stuff that's out in the public domain. Who knows what else the Dems have ready to put out there.

Clinton has been a public figure for about the same amount of time...

10   indigenous   2016 May 10, 4:39pm  

tatupu70 says

Clinton has been a public figure for about the same amount of time...

Sactly all of her transgressions were clandestine under the guise of "public service".

11   zzyzzx   2016 May 17, 12:02pm  

Hillary's lies.

1. My husband is not a sexual predator and I don't support his abuse of women.
2. Bill and I have a normal marriage, and any assertions that by defending him against allegations of aberrant sexual behavior I enable him to continue to prey upon vulnerable women are false.
3 . Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and all the others who have claimed to have had sex, been sexually harassed, assaulted or raped by Bill Clinton are just white trash publicity seekers.
4. Bill did not have sex with Monica Lewinsky; allegations that he did are part of a vast right wing conspiracy.
5. I was shocked to discover that Bill had had sex with Monica Lewinsky, but I forgave him because I love him and he had never done anything like that before and he hasn’t since.
6. I do not have a vicious temper and reports that my ripping into Vince Foster on the morning he committed suicide may have driven him over the edge are unfounded.
7. I never have had temper tantrums or exhibited violent behavior like throwing ashtrays or lamps when I found out about something I didn’t like or couldn’t get my own way.
8. Reports that I told White House staff and Secret Service agents to step into a closet or hide behind a curtain because I didn’t want to have to see them when I walked down the halls are simply stories made up by an unscrupulous reporter.
9. Had Hillary Care been implemented it would have provided high quality affordable health care to all Americans while preserving their freedom to choose their doctors and their plans.
10. I had no idea where the Rose Law firm billing records were.
11. The Whitewater land deal was totally above board and there was nothing illegal or even unethical about it.
12. When I said I came under sniper fire when I landed in Sarajevo I wasn’t lying.
13. As Secretary of State, the ruling junta in Myanmar did not play me for a fool by pretending to embrace democratic reforms; that they slipped back into authoritarianism the minute I normalized relations and lifted sanctions is just a coincidence.
14. As Secretary of State I reset relations with Russia so that now the former republics and satellite states of the old Soviet Union have nothing to fear and can breathe easily knowing that Russian aggression has been checked.
15. As Secretary of State it was not my fault that the US didn’t sign a single free trade agreement during my tenure or that the Trans Pacific Partnership never got off the ground while China’s Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank is a roaring success.
16. I can’t be held responsible for the fact that after our pivot to Asia the US position in the Far East is the weakest it has been since the start of the Second World War and that China is now the dominant Pacific power.
17. Our proposed Free Trade of the America’s Agreement also never got off the ground while Mercosur is another success, but that wasn’t my fault either; South America just isn’t that important so it would have been foolish of me to waste my time on that area of the world.
18. There was no need for me to focus my attentions on sub-Saharan Africa because terrorist groups like Boko Haram and al-Qaeda in the Islamic Mahgreb do not pose a threat to the United States or our interests in Africa.
19. The Arab Spring was a success and we were right to support the Muslim Brotherhood’s takeover of Egypt.
20. Libya is not the failure my critics make it out to be.
21. I might have been mistaken in attributing the attack on our Consulate in Benghazi to a despicable video, but what difference does it make now why the Consulate was burned and three Americans died Americans.
22. I don’t remember signing a waiver to allow the heavily fortified CIA annex and the virtually defenseless Benghazi Consulate to be in separate locations rather than co-located as required by law.
23. I do not remember refusing to increase security at the Consulate and refusing to close the Consulate and withdraw our people when it became clear that it was only a matter of time before a serious attack on the compound would occur, but then I can’t be expected to read every email from an ambassador even if it is marked urgent, immediate attention required.
24. Marines were not assigned to protect the Consulate in Benghazi because the Consulate did not house or process any classified information. [This is a ridiculous lie, but fortunately the American people are too uninformed to realize that every one of our diplomatic posts contain and process classified information, and the mainstream media was too in love with me to point out what a whopper of a lie this is when it first appeared in my book,Hard Choices.]
25. I knew we could rely on locally hired Libyan security guards to protect our people, which is why we didn’t even bother to tell the commander of Africa Command, General Ham, that we had a Consulate in Benghazi.
26. Our program of covertly arming groups who claimed to be moderate Syrian rebels was a great success, and any reports that the weapons we provided fell into the hands of al-Qaeda or ISIL are unfounded.
27. Peace and stability in Yemen is one of my stellar foreign policy accomplishments, and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and the Houthi rebels are no longer significant threats.
28. Iraq is better off today than when I took office.
29. My efforts as Secretary of State have made a peaceful resolution of the continuing conflicts in Syria and Afghanistan possible.
30. I traveled to 112 countries as Secretary of State, and as a result of my efforts championing women’s rights, women are better off, especially in Muslim nations, than ever before.
31. The world is a safer place today than when I took office, and America is held in higher regard than ever before.
32. I did not violate the Federal Records act by using a private server for my email communications because I never used my private server to send, receive or store classified or sensitive information. [Now that’s another whopper, but then Goebbels was correct when he said, “If you tell a big lie enough, and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” Besides no one will ever be able to get their hands on my server so I’m safe.]
33. I didn’t have a private server so I could delete communications that might prove that I had violated the law such as soliciting donations for the Clinton Foundation from foreign, especially Middle Eastern governments.
34. Allegations that I used my position to help my brother obtain contracts by leaning on DHS to grant permanent residence status to some unsavory characters are not true.
35. Anyone who says I don’t deserve to be elected President is engaging in a war on women.

12   HydroCabron   2016 May 17, 12:08pm  

Before I make any life decision or choose a candidate, I look to see if Linda Tripp has weighed in.

A bitter old bureaucrat who befriends young women to betray them for political purposes is the best source of information.

13   Tenpoundbass   2016 May 17, 3:47pm  

tatupu70 says

You guys make me laugh. You don't think there is a dossier that's 3X as thick on Trump?

Yes there is, and it is probably locked and sealed away in a vault, it was another 10 million dollar fiasco that came up with 10,000 pages on why you should vote for Trump.

Woah Oh Yeah!

If there was any dirt on Trump worth throwing, it would have been found by now.

What's more likeley they have spent even three times more money than on that dossier on Hobo Traps for Trump or people in his campaign. Just waiting for anyone to slip up, or if they can video that can be edited out of context. There is a real threat against Trump they are trolling like hell to set him up. Especially now they conceded the contested convention and you got Mitt, Cruz and Rubio and Ryan sulking in the fringes. In constant contact with their moles, getting debriefings and viability of getting a hit at Trumps next political function.

You can count on that. Other than that, there's nothing in his past. That they can use against him, or he would be gone by now. The Establishment would have unloaded it before Bush dropped out.

14   Tenpoundbass   2016 May 17, 3:52pm  

And if or when that does happen. Lorreta the ugly ass AG will swoop down and formally make charges against him and a panel of NeverTrump will unilaterally conclude that Trump forfeits his candidacy. And people will never get to vote if that dirt was enough to break the deal or not. And this would go on, while Hillary Clinton never sees a minute before a jury answering questions about the litany of alegations and facts levied against her.

15   tatupu70   2016 May 17, 3:56pm  

Tenpoundbass says

If there was any dirt on Trump worth throwing, it would have been found by now.

It has been found already-you are correct. Just that nobody cared that much when he was just a narcissistic TV personality. Now that he's running for President, the scandals seem a bit more relevant.

Ties to organized crime in both the US and Russia.
Racism in renting his apartments
Trump University scam
Lies, lies, and more lies. Calling reporters and pretending he is a publicist. You can't make this stuff up.
And my guess is more and more will continue coming out--drip by drip.

16   elliemae   2016 May 17, 8:12pm  

Linda Tripp is a fat, ugly opportunistic bitch who is wasting good air. She should stop breathing - that would cure it.

17   turtledove   2016 May 17, 8:19pm  

elliemae says

Linda Tripp is a fat, ugly opportunistic bitch who is wasting good air. She should stop breathing - that would cure it.

Well, if that ain't the truth. Can you imagine, confiding in an older woman who you think is helping you only to learn that she's the one who sold you out and made you the infamous devil-in-a-blue-dress-with-a-cum-stain.

18   indigenous   2016 May 17, 8:19pm  

Are yous going to vote for Hillary?

19   Y   2016 May 17, 9:19pm  

wow. look at all the people that can't handle the truth...
tripp speaks the truth...

20   HydroCabron   2016 May 17, 9:21pm  

indigenous says

Are yous going to vote for Hillary?

Why? Are you enforcing political conformity?

Seems as if the biggest PC-enforcing comment-thread policemen are self-described libertarians.

Here's a secret: Anyone can dislike BOTH Hillary and Linda Tripp! Amazing but true!

21   indigenous   2016 May 17, 9:26pm  

HydroCabron says

Here's a secret: Anyone can dislike BOTH Hillary and Linda Tripp! Amazing but true!

Yea but that doesn't seem to be the implication.

22   HydroCabron   2016 May 17, 9:28pm  

indigenous says

Yea but that doesn't seem to be the implication.

What does it matter? Both sides are the same to a Libertarian - two wings of the same evil vulture.

Or are you a liar?

23   indigenous   2016 May 17, 9:30pm  

Hillary is a sociopath, if she wins we will have more war. Not totally in favor of Trump he is not as fucked up

24   HydroCabron   2016 May 17, 9:33pm  

indigenous says

Not totally in favor of Trump he is not as fucked up

Translation: Both sides are not the same.

So you're leaning Trump. Because you're a religious fanatic, but ashamed to admit it?

What are the reasons you have supported mostly Republicans your whole life? Do the lies you tell yourself and others vary between elections?

25   indigenous   2016 May 17, 9:36pm  

HydroCabron says

So you're leaning Trump. Because you're a religious fanatic, but ashamed to admit it?

Nope just agin Hillary

HydroCabron says

What are the reasons you have supported mostly Republicans your whole life?

The Libertarians have no chance of winning.

26   HydroCabron   2016 May 17, 9:45pm  

indigenous says

HydroCabron says

What are the reasons you have supported mostly Republicans your whole life?

The Libertarians have no chance of winning.

How convenient for you.

What's interesting about the evangelicals this year is that Trump is a complete heathen adulterer, and anti-Christian in many other ways. Yet they're falling into line because they're racists.

In your case, Trump is actually to the left of Hillary - but only for white people - so it's particularly funny that you'd choose him.

You can't even come up with the same excuses to always vote Republican. I'm guessing it goes something like this:

- In 2000: "Gore's too environmentalist - big government all around"
- In 2004, after Bush demonstrated he was warmongering trash who spent like crazy without taxing: "I hate deficits, but Bush means well in his heart, and somehow it's not so bad when a Republican starts a stupid war."
- In 2008: "Can't trust that Obama. Better get behind McCain. Don't like Obama's veep choice much."
- In 2012: "Well, Romney is clearly more warlike that Obama, but that's a good thing, because he's a Republican."

Amazing.

27   indigenous   2016 May 17, 9:57pm  

what is your point?

28   Ceffer   2016 May 17, 11:37pm  

I always wondered if Linda Tripp was snarfing Bill's nads under the desk in the Oval Office and was jealous of Lewinsky, and it was scorned woman's revenge to blow the whistle.

Heh, heh! I said blow the whistle!

Things would have been much different if Tripp and Lewinsky had a three way clam slurp with IHLlary instead of wasting time on Goat Bill.

IHLlary a psychopath? I thought that's the first thing politicians put on their resumes in capital letters.

29   zzyzzx   2016 Jul 30, 7:49pm  

Tenpoundbass says

Hillary's whooping cough is about to much worse.

Supposedly, it is Syphilis:
https://i.sli.mg/8gad3T.png

30   MMR   2016 Jul 31, 7:57am  

tatupu70 says

Organized crime in the US. Organized crime in Russia. Trump University scam.

If they could have used it convincingly they would have done so by this point

31   mell   2016 Jul 31, 8:28am  

HydroCabron says

You can't even come up with the same excuses to always vote Republican. I'm guessing it goes something like this:

- In 2000: "Gore's too environmentalist - big government all around"

- In 2004, after Bush demonstrated he was warmongering trash who spent like crazy without taxing: "I hate deficits, but Bush means well in his heart, and somehow it's not so bad when a Republican starts a stupid war."

- In 2008: "Can't trust that Obama. Better get behind McCain. Don't like Obama's veep choice much."

- In 2012: "Well, Romney is clearly more warlike that Obama, but that's a good thing, because he's a Republican."

Amazing.

Not sure about indy, but I think there are many Libertarians and Conservatives who are not committed to voting the party line, probably more-so than Democrats these days. I supported Gore (begrudgingly but didn't want Bush) and Obama in 2008 (not in 2012).

32   indigenous   2016 Jul 31, 8:58am  

If I had to choose I would pick Trump, I'm thinking about not choosing.

Voting is a tacit acknowledgment of the system, which is FUBAR.

Cabron will choose to call this dithering, but that is the way he rolls...

33   HydroCabron   2016 Jul 31, 10:51am  

indigenous says

what is your point?

That you repeatedly sell out your declared principles, because you don't really hold them as principles. You identify with the Republican party racially and demographically, and find an excuse to support them, no matter how different the excuse is each time.

When Trump first appeared, you expressed alarm at his authoritarian anti-market leftism. I was amazed, but figured you'd find a way to rationalize him as the lesser of two evils.

And here we are. You call yourself libertarian but are supporting the most constitutionally-ignorant, power-centralizing authoritarian candidate ever nominated.

Save yourself, and everyone else, time and energy: Call yourself a "die hard, dead-ender steadfastly loyal Republican" and be done with it.

What's wrong with honesty?

34   indigenous   2016 Jul 31, 10:58am  

HydroCabron says

Save yourself, and everyone else, time and energy: Call yourself a "die hard, dead-ender steadfastly loyal Republican" and be done with it.

Because my dumb ass friend, I'm staunchly against war. The bulk of the Rs are necons. Hillary is a hawk/neocon.

Unlike the Rs I am socially liberal, I don't care about LGBTs I want to legalize drugs. However I am pro life.

I do care about government growth which is the ultimate hypocrisy of the Rs albeit their's is war spending the D's is a legacy of debt and starting wars. Which Hillary aligns perfectly with.

I guess you would call me an almost pure Libertarian?

35   HydroCabron   2016 Jul 31, 11:14am  

indigenous says

I'm staunchly against war.

I'd enjoy seeing an actual argument between you and someone on this site who calls Democrats pussies for not being warlike enough. Funny: I don't think it's ever happened.

If you believe that Trump, who can't back down or let any perceived slight go unanswered, will bring our troops home and not start more wars (while getting much tougher on ISIS), I'd direct you the wealth of evidence to the contrary. Trump can't even let remarks from the family of a Muslim soldier go - he's still tweeting attacks on them. Hillary, meanwhile, was attacked by families of Benghazi victims, as well as families of 9-11 survivors (interesting, 9-11 happened under W), and she turned the other cheek.

Trump is a narcissistic soulless man-baby who never backs down - he has openly stated this as a core tenet. You really believe he'll close our bases, bring our boys home, and not start wars while being tougher on Islamic extremism than all who have come before? Did you also believe W when he said he was against "nation building" during the 2000 election?

I think you have real principles, but not the ones you state. You support the candidate from the whitest, most Christian, most male party, and work backward from there to fill in how this jibes with your pretend libertarianism.

Let me guess: you believed W to be less warlike than Al Gore or John Kerry, McCain to be less warlike than Obama in 2008, and Romney to be less warlike than Obama in 2012? Such a coincidence that the Republican is always less warlike! What are the odds?

Yet it must be so: you are "staunchly" against war, so it must be your main voting criterion.

36   indigenous   2016 Jul 31, 11:30am  

Hillary has demonstrated a propensity for war. Trump has not, albeit that will probably change if Pence has any input.

Kerry is a hawk, McCain is actually a sales rep for the defense industry, Obama hasn't stopped any wars only exacerbated the situation.

I guess because you are computer guy you can only understand binary?

37   HydroCabron   2016 Jul 31, 11:46am  

indigenous says

Hillary has demonstrated a propensity for war. Trump has not, albeit that will probably change if Pence has any input.

And someone who thinks Linda Tripp's opinion matters is not a Republican. Sad.

38   indigenous   2016 Jul 31, 11:47am  

HydroCabron says

And someone who thinks Linda Tripp's opinion matters is not a Republican. Sad

Meh

39   asdfzxh   2017 Jun 8, 9:35am  

wrong,idiots, no such thing as silenx or breaking silenx by her

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions