1
0

Neocon wars killing us at home


 invite response                
2016 Sep 26, 11:38am   2,449 views  14 comments

by Blurtman   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

Orlando gunman claimed shooting was motivated by death of ISIS operative

The gunman behind the deadliest terror attack on U.S. soil since 9/11 was compelled to shoot up a gay nightclub in Orlando because of an airstrike that killed a top extremist commander, he told a hostage negotiator shortly before being gunned down by police.

In a newly released transcript of one of the calls with police made during his siege of the Pulse nightclub early on June 12, Omar Mateen said his massacre was retribution for the coalition strike that killed Abu Waheeb, a somewhat obscure executioner and propagandist with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

“Yo, the airstrike that killed Abu Wahid [sic] a few weeks ago, that’s what triggered it, okay?” Mateen told a police negotiator in one of the multiple calls made while he was inside the nightclub.

“They should have not bombed and killed Abu Wahid [sic].”

In the calls with the police, Mateeen repeatedly pledged allegiance to ISIS and called for the U.S. and its allies to halt airstrikes in Iraq and Syria.

“You have to tell the U.S. government to stop bombing,” he said. “They are killing too many children, they are killing too many women, okay?”

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/297801-orlando-gunman-claimed-shooting-was-motivated-by-death-of-isis

#HillarySucks

Comments 1 - 14 of 14        Search these comments

1   Strategist   2016 Sep 26, 11:50am  

Blurtman says

In the calls with the police, Mateeen repeatedly pledged allegiance to ISIS and called for the U.S. and its allies to halt airstrikes in Iraq and Syria.

“You have to tell the U.S. government to stop bombing,” he said. “They are killing too many children, they are killing too many women, okay?”

You are so naive, Blurtman. They have been attacking us well before Iraq, Syria, and 911.

2   Blurtman   2016 Sep 26, 12:32pm  

Strategist says

You are so naive, Blurtman. They have been attacking us well before Iraq, Syria, and 911.

And we have been meddling in the Middle East well before Iraq, Syria, and 911.

But the post references to the shooter's claimed motive.

3   Strategist   2016 Sep 26, 1:11pm  

Blurtman says

Strategist says

You are so naive, Blurtman. They have been attacking us well before Iraq, Syria, and 911.

And we have been meddling in the Middle East well before Iraq, Syria, and 911.

But the post references to the shooter's claimed motive.

All they need is an excuse to kill. And excuses are dime a dozen.

4   HydroCabron   2016 Sep 26, 1:14pm  

Blurtman says

And we have been meddling in the Middle East well before Iraq, Syria, and 911.

Trump is the clear choice.

He will convene a panel of generals - the best generals, a lot of kind, loving generals - and have them come up with a plan to defeat ISIS immediately.

Such a plan, being formulated by generals, will surely involve no military action or presence in the Middle East whatsoever.

5   curious2   2016 Sep 26, 1:29pm  

In particular, the terrible combination of invade&import: if you wage war across the Islamic world on behalf of Saudi Arabia, while simultaneously importing Islam, you should expect blowback. Sadly, that's been the policy of both major parties, increasingly since Nixon's secret deals with Saudi Arabia enabled the MIC to become dependent on Petrodollars. Instead of rejecting the charlatan Mohamed's hateful fraud, we have fallen under the spell of Saudi financed politicians and Islamic centers that advocate the doctrine of Daniel Pipes: celebrate, empower, and finance so-called "moderate" Muslims, meaning Muslims who agree to kill Russians in the name of Islam, but then act surprised when they start killing Americans in the name of Islam, which says to kill both.

6   Strategist   2016 Sep 26, 2:50pm  

HydroCabron says

Trump is the clear choice.

He will convene a panel of generals - the best generals, a lot of kind, loving generals - and have them come up with a plan to defeat ISIS immediately.

Such a plan, being formulated by generals, will surely involve no military action or presence in the Middle East whatsoever.

No doubt Trump can deal with Islam's terrorists better than Hillary can.
We need a vicious hyena to fight Islam, not some pussycat.

7   Blurtman   2016 Sep 26, 3:12pm  

I'll repeat the obvious - if some percentage of the Muslim community will engage in terrorism, and if some percentage of Muslim immigrants can be triggered to kill by ISIS, or because of US military actions in Muslim countries, or because they don't like American women's habits of dress, then do we want to put lives at risk just to execute the libbies' pie-in-the-sky agenda?

8   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Sep 26, 3:18pm  

Who is Abu al-Walid?

A Saudi Terrorist, killed by a Russian Elite Battalion, "Vostok".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_al-Walid

9   Shaman   2016 Sep 26, 3:20pm  

The answer to that question is always "NO!" There is NO reason to import people who believe that they should be dominating the world's people by the sword.
That's just stupidity masquerading as philanthropy. Also it doesn't count as philanthropy when you're billing the American people to cover the cost of your stupid immigration policies.

10   Strategist   2016 Sep 26, 3:25pm  

Blurtman says

I'll repeat the obvious - if some percentage of the Muslim community will engage in terrorism, and if some percentage of Muslim immigrants can be triggered to kill by ISIS, or because of US military actions in Muslim countries, or because they don't like American women's habits of dress, then do we want to put lives at risk just to execute the libbies' pie-in-the-sky agenda?

We need to fight wars to conquer the likes of ISIS, an organization that can quickly spread across the globe. Once we conquer them, we need the right policies and right puppet governments to keep the likes of ISIS from gaining power. So far we have failed in preventing ISIS coming back to power. Our existing policies simply do not work. We need a Trump. The more vicious he is the better.
Your idea of just letting them be, will cause ISIS to take control of the whole Middle East, engage in unimaginable human rights abuses, and bite us next in the ass. Being a nice guy like Obama was, does not work when we have ISIS yapping at our heels.

11   🎂 Rin   2016 Sep 26, 5:56pm  

The Orlando gunman was a repressed, Islamic closet gay guy.

If his father had died, when he was a boy and he'd been raised by me, we would have gotten drunk, attended Metallica concerts together, and f.ucked hoes around the world.

And then one day ... he realizes that instead of poking the likes of a Selma Hayek look-a-like, he'd rather do a male Chippendale's model, well, at that point, we'd part ways at the hotel, so that I go into my private quarters with a busty lingerie model, whereas he goes back to his suite with an Adonis type. I don't need anymore details than that.

In the morning, we meet up for breakfast. He's happy and then realizes, he doesn't need to go on a killing spree to be content in life.

He can f.uck man hoes and I can f.uck, female hoes. All is well in the world.

13   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 May 31, 6:38pm  

Hey @curious2, guess who was totally denied Bail?

His Paleban Wife.

14   socal2   2017 May 31, 7:01pm  

Way to keep your eye on the ball Blurtman. Keep blaming those Neocon joooos and not Islamic radicals.

The Saudis and ISIS thank you for aping their propaganda.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions