« First « Previous Comments 5 - 26 of 26 Search these comments
Are we allowed to say racist shit on Patnet? And is it racist if it's true?
That depends.. Is the person in question a spic, wap, beaner, redneck, kite, dago, dike, fag, or nigger?
As I read the title of the post, the first vision I received was a nigger kicking the shit out of another nigger. I knew I needn't check but I did. Sho nuff, it was a nigger.
Queens can be queens and some queens and beez quangs, but nos quangs can be queens.
"You should teach your child to wait till people come out of the elevator instead of trying to get in," the septuagenarian said as they stepped onto the elevator, according to a police source.
The old woman is right, and the young mother should have appreciated the advice.
As I read the title of the post, the first vision I received was a nigger kicking the shit out of another nigger. I knew I needn't check but I did. Sho nuff, it was a nigger.
The younger woman fits your description. The older woman does not. Chris Rock explains.
Mom Busted in Alleged Attack on Woman, 71, With Victim's Own Cane for Saying Her Child Needs Manners
I'm willing to make a bold prediction:
Before that kid reaches puberty, he will spend time in juvenile hall.
By the time he is 21, he will be arrested 10 times, and end up in jail 3 times.
By the time he is 25, he will dead, after being shot by a rival gang.
This thread demonstrates a point I keep making. Parenting should be licensed. Not everyone should be allowed to become a parent simply because they want to. It's a responsibility, not a right.
This thread demonstrates a point I keep making. Parenting should be licensed. Not everyone should be allowed to become a parent simply because they want to. It's a responsibility, not a right.
I thought you liked freedom and hate the government for spying. Now you want them to decide if you can have babies?
I thought you liked freedom and hate the government for spying. Now you want them to decide if you can have babies?
There is no connection between licensing parents and domestic spying, violating wiretap laws, torturing people, and state-sponsored rape.
The government already takes away the freedom of parents to raise children through Child Protective Services. What I'm suggesting is to be pro-active so that CPS does not have to do that. Prevent the problems in the first place. That's not an assault on human rights like anally searching a person is. Parenting is not a right. It's a responsibility.
Oh, and the government most certainly does restrict the freedom to have children already. See anti-incest laws and preventing sexual relationships in prisons.
I thought you liked freedom and hate the government for spying. Now you want them to decide if you can have babies?
Also, you do realize that the NSA doesn't run CPS, right? They are entirely different people in those two agencies. You act as if the government were one single mind.
An agency that violates wire tapping laws with zero accountability to spy on underage girls while they take off their clothes is not the exact same thing as an agency that openly and transparently acts to protect children from child abuse. Different kinds of people go into those two organizations.
There is no connection between licensing parents and domestic spying, violating wiretap laws, torturing people, and state-sponsored rape.
The government already takes away the freedom of parents to raise children through Child Protective Services. What I'm suggesting is to be pro-active so that CPS does not have to do that. Prevent the problems in the first place. That's not an assault on human rights like anally searching a person is. Parenting is not a right. It's a responsibility.
I would love to see some people be prevented from having kids. But it ain't even gonna come up for discussion in Congress. We are not communist China.
Oh, and the government most certainly does restrict the freedom to have children already. See anti-incest laws and preventing sexual relationships in prisons.
Inbreeding causes physical and mental defects among children. That is as good as child abuse, so incest must be banned.
Muslims marry their first cousins as their first choice. The deformities they experience are super high compared to non Muslims.
p.s. I would support Muslims being restricted the world over from breeding. They are literally fucking their way to the top.
I would love to see some people be prevented from having kids. But it ain't even gonna come up for discussion in Congress. We are not communist China.
No. China had a transparent and universal one-child policy. In contrast, the United States has secretly sterilized civilians with no court oversight and often on blatantly ethnic basis. That's much worse. That's like Nazi-bad, not China-bad.
No. China had a transparent and universal one-child policy. In contrast, the United States has secretly sterilized civilians with no court oversight and often on blatantly ethnic basis. That's much worse. That's like Nazi-bad, not China-bad.
Unbelievable. You are no different than those who believe there are 72 virgins in heaven.
No. China had a transparent and universal one-child policy. In contrast, the United States has secretly sterilized civilians with no court oversight and often on blatantly ethnic basis. That's much worse. That's like Nazi-bad, not China-bad.
Unbelievable. You are no different than those who believe there are 72 virgins in heaven.
If you believe that, then you are a fool. If not, then you are a liar.
I refuted your assertion that the U.S. is without human rights violation with a very real example in recent history. Are you denying the truth I presented? Care to dispute the facts?
No. China had a transparent and universal one-child policy. In contrast, the United States has secretly sterilized civilians with no court oversight and often on blatantly ethnic basis. That's much worse. That's like Nazi-bad, not China-bad.
Unbelievable. You are no different than those who believe there are 72 virgins in heaven.
If you believe that, then you are a fool. If not, then you are a liar.
I refuted your assertion that the U.S. is without human rights violation with a very real example in recent history. Are you denying the truth I presented? Care to dispute the facts?
Sterilizing mentally sick patients is not a human rights violation.
Punishing normal people from having kids for whatever reason, is human rights abuse.
The younger woman fits your description. The older woman does not.
the more rights and opportunities are given to blacks the angrier they get. hence the difference between today's blacks and older blacks.
i have said that before and i was attacked by some VERY angry white man here. (maybe he was attracted to black males. who knows.) but i will say this again.
blacks were A LOT HAPPIER when they were slaves and really oppressed because they had excuses. every since they have been given equal rights and opportunities, they realized the truth: they can't compete. NOW there's a reason to get angry.
This is what happens if you grow up without manners. Ratchets fighting in the Waffle House.
No. China had a transparent and universal one-child policy. In contrast, the United States has secretly sterilized civilians with no court oversight and often on blatantly ethnic basis.
They should stop the Realtor's from breeding.
Sterilizing mentally sick patients is not a human rights violation.
If done for ethnic cleansing, it sure the hell is.
Plus there are other cases of forced sterilization in the United States. Your ignorance of American history is amazing.
While California’s eugenics programs were driven in part by anti-Asian and anti-Mexican prejudice, Southern states also employed sterilization as a means of controlling African American populations. “Mississippi appendectomies†was another name for unnecessary hysterectomies performed at teaching hospitals in the South on women of color as practice for medical students. This NBC news article discusses North Carolina’s eugenics program, including stories from victims of forced sterilization like Elaine Riddick. A third of the sterilizations were done on girls under 18, even as young as 9. The state also targeted individuals seen as “delinquent†or “unwholesome.â€
In Monday’s PBS documentary premiere, “No Más Bebés,†Maria Hurtado speaks of the moment she realized that she couldn’t have more children, “They must’ve thought, ‘this woman has so many kids, we’ll just sew her up, so she won’t know that we did the operation.’†Mrs. Hurtado is one of ten plaintiffs who filed a civil rights lawsuit against doctors at the Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, claiming that they were sterilized without their consent. Another woman, Conseulo Hermosillo, then 23 years old, didn’t realized that she had been sterilized until she asked her doctor for birth control. Maria Figueroa was raising her young children in East Los Angeles when she learned that she’d been sterilized. Dolores Madrigal and her husband were saving up for a house and more children by working factory jobs. When they learned that Dolores had been sterilized, her family broke apart, as she and her husband dealt with the pain and anger of their crushed dreams. In “No Más Bebés,†filmmaker Renee Tajima-Peña tells the story of these Mexican immigrant women who sued a powerful hospital, county doctors, the state of California and the U.S. Government after having been sterilized without their consent.
Facts are a bitch, aren't they?
Illegals should be sterilized, they shouldn't be breeding on the US taxpayers dime. GTFO
This thread demonstrates a point I keep making. Parenting should be licensed. Not everyone should be allowed to become a parent simply because they want to. It's a responsibility, not a right.
I thought you liked freedom and hate the government for spying. Now you want them to decide if you can have babies?
Dan's mind is overburdened w hypocrisy. He's too desperate to show how smart he is to actually think.
RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says
blacks were A LOT HAPPIER when they were slaves and really oppressed because they had excuses. every since they have been given equal rights and opportunities, they realized the truth: they can't compete. NOW there's a reason to get angry.
Do you not know any black people?
The problem isn't black people, exactly, it the inner-city black culture that was destroyed by big-prison business R's and culture destroying welfare D's. Blacks would be fine if we stopped using them as a stick with which to politically beat the rest of society.
Go into the welfare ghetto's of chicago. These kids have no chance, and thats on all of us
RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says
blacks were A LOT HAPPIER when they were slaves and really oppressed because they had excuses. every since they have been given equal rights and opportunities, they realized the truth: they can't compete. NOW there's a reason to get angry.
Do you not know any black people?
The problem isn't black people, exactly, it the inner-city black culture that was destroyed by big-prison business R's and culture destroying welfare D's. Blacks would be fine if we stopped using them as a stick with which to politically beat the rest of society.
Go into the welfare ghetto's of chicago. These kids have no chance, and thats on all of us
do you really know black people or you just know them online and on TV?
who created the black ghetto culture if not blacks themselves? Jews were slaves too. how do you explain the contrast of the two cultures?
prisons were build because of the increase in crimes not the other way around. why so many crimes associated with blacks?
blame it on poverty? have you ever been outside of the U.S? 100 x poorer than black's ghetto areas and yet 100 x more civilized.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mom-busted-alleged-attack-woman-151500959.html