Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Search these comments
Playing cherry picking game with alarmists is not interesting, not even for trolling purposes. They will (and, in this post, already have) reply 'my totally not cherry picked metric is better than yours!'.
anonymous saysSo you didn't look at the trend line.
Rotfl.
Of course I didn't look at the trend line, because there is no the trend line. There are many places with ice growing and receding, there are multiple temperature records, there are multiple proxy temp reconstructions. You move goal posts twice a year, why bother keeping up?
Three decades ago, James Hansen said that West Side Highway will be underwater in forty years, assuming doubling CO2. How is that prediction holding up? How have his three scenarios fared -- compared to null hypothesis (which is 'there will be nothing unusual in 21st century')?
a1232
Arctic sea ice extent is up 40% from this date five years ago.
Greenland’s surface gained ten times as much ice as it did five years ago, and was the fifth highest on record.
https://realclimatescience.com/2017/09/40-sea-ice-ice-gain-over-the-past-five-years/