patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,189,753 comments by 13,848 users - richwicks, Skygoddess, SunnyvaleCA online now
Couple who had sex at the counter of a Domino's pizza shop
invite response
2017 Sep 25, 7:17am 6,320 views 31 comments
Comments 1 - 31 of 31 Search these comments
1
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 8:04am
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 8:04am
RAPE says
Hey we all love disgusting sex. More disgusting the better. Can someone post the fucking video?
Couple who had sex at the counter of a Domino's pizza shop face PRISON after court sees 18-minute CCTV footage of their 'obscene and disgusting act'
A couple who had sex in Domino's face prison after a video of their 'obscene and disgusting' was shown in court.
CCTV footage of Daniella Hirst and Craig Smith having sex on the counter while waiting for a 12inch pepperoni pizza with stuffed crust was shown at Scarborough Magistrates Court today.
Hirst, 29, sat at the back of the court with her hands over her eyes in shame through the more explicit parts of the 18-minute clip.
The prosecutor said: 'We view this offence as so serious that it passes the custody threshold.'
The video showed the couple ordering food and messing around with a yellow cleaning cone before Hirst performs oral sex on Smith, 31.
The pair then have sex leaning on the counter close to the till.
Hey we all love disgusting sex. More disgusting the better. Can someone post the fucking video?
3
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 9:05am
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 9:05am
RAPE says
12 inch pepperoni? You wish.
CCTV footage of Daniella Hirst and Craig Smith having sex on the counter while waiting for a 12inch pepperoni
12 inch pepperoni? You wish.
4
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 9:10am
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 9:10am
RAPE says
1. This should not be a crime.
2. I'm not outraged by their actions.
3. Behaving in an "indecent manner" is purely a matter of opinion. I would call praying a far more indecent act than fellatio.
4. Such charges are a violation of the separation of church and state. The state should not enforced arbitrary religious sex laws. This is the Christian equivalent of Sharia Law and the morality police.
RAPE says
The victims here, if any, are the couple who's privacy was violated. It's questionable whether or not they even knew they were being recorded.
This is the perfect example of a case where jury nullification should be exercised. The state should not have the right to prosecute people for performing a natural act which does not harm anyone.
Hirst pleaded guilty to 'committing an act outraging public decency by behaving in an indecent manner'.
1. This should not be a crime.
2. I'm not outraged by their actions.
3. Behaving in an "indecent manner" is purely a matter of opinion. I would call praying a far more indecent act than fellatio.
4. Such charges are a violation of the separation of church and state. The state should not enforced arbitrary religious sex laws. This is the Christian equivalent of Sharia Law and the morality police.
RAPE says
Hirst described her behaviour as 'horrendous' and told the court she 'cringed' when watching the CCTV footage back during police interview.
The victims here, if any, are the couple who's privacy was violated. It's questionable whether or not they even knew they were being recorded.
This is the perfect example of a case where jury nullification should be exercised. The state should not have the right to prosecute people for performing a natural act which does not harm anyone.
5
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 9:14am
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 9:14am
Strategist says
The released video is blurred out.
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/dominos-sex-couple-told-prison-514541
Can someone post the fucking video?
The released video is blurred out.
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/dominos-sex-couple-told-prison-514541
6
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 9:26am
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 9:26am
Dan8267 says
How can sex with a pretty woman like her be disgusting? I'm sure everyone wants a blow job from her.
How can sex with a pretty woman like her be disgusting? I'm sure everyone wants a blow job from her.
10
anonymous
2017 Sep 25, 11:21am
Dan is right - indecent is a matter of opinion!!!
Everyone should be free to take a crap in the office hallway as long as they put a newspaper down first. No one should be disciplined or fired for this act of free expression!!!!!
Everyone should be free to take a crap in the office hallway as long as they put a newspaper down first. No one should be disciplined or fired for this act of free expression!!!!!
11
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 11:55am
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 11:55am
jazz_music says
The United Kingdom today has more separation of church and state than the United States. However, this is an exception to that rule that should be corrected. The citizens of the United Kingdom demand far more separation of church and state than U.S. citizens do. American politicians get cheers when they talk about being inspired by their god, which they do often. On the rare occasion when U.K. politicians do the same, they get booed, and rightfully so.
Yes, technically the Church of England is a state entity, but it rarely has the ability for force its will onto the people and the majority of Britons believe in separation of church and state.
This is England where church and state are one thing with the queen acting as pope.
The United Kingdom today has more separation of church and state than the United States. However, this is an exception to that rule that should be corrected. The citizens of the United Kingdom demand far more separation of church and state than U.S. citizens do. American politicians get cheers when they talk about being inspired by their god, which they do often. On the rare occasion when U.K. politicians do the same, they get booed, and rightfully so.
Yes, technically the Church of England is a state entity, but it rarely has the ability for force its will onto the people and the majority of Britons believe in separation of church and state.
12
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 12:00pm
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 12:00pm
anonymous says
Prove that indecency is objective and immutable, piggy. Go ahead and try.
anonymous says
Prohibitions against public defecation based on public health issues are perfectly fine. Your analogy is simply false.
A better analogy would be the Sharia police arresting couples for kissing in public because doing so is "indecent". Clearly you are for the Christian equivalent of Sharia law. It should not surprise you then when Sharia law comes to America as the Muslim population increases. Let local government pass indecency laws and such governments will pass Sharia law when Muslims become a large enough minority to seize control of a local government. This will happen within your lifetime.
anonymous says
Only an idiot equates the government's law with an employer's code of conduct. The former is enforced at gunpoint. When you are thrown in a cage or shot to death for resisting being thrown in a cage for violating your employer's dress code, then you'll have a point, piggy.
Dan is right - indecent is a matter of opinion!!!
Prove that indecency is objective and immutable, piggy. Go ahead and try.
anonymous says
Everyone should be free to take a crap in the office hallway as long as they put a newspaper down first.
Prohibitions against public defecation based on public health issues are perfectly fine. Your analogy is simply false.
A better analogy would be the Sharia police arresting couples for kissing in public because doing so is "indecent". Clearly you are for the Christian equivalent of Sharia law. It should not surprise you then when Sharia law comes to America as the Muslim population increases. Let local government pass indecency laws and such governments will pass Sharia law when Muslims become a large enough minority to seize control of a local government. This will happen within your lifetime.
anonymous says
No one should be disciplined or fired for this act of free expression!!!!!
Only an idiot equates the government's law with an employer's code of conduct. The former is enforced at gunpoint. When you are thrown in a cage or shot to death for resisting being thrown in a cage for violating your employer's dress code, then you'll have a point, piggy.
14
Ernie
2017 Sep 25, 1:11pm
rpanic01 says
It did not create any unsanitary conditions.
jazz_music says
They did not, so it is beyond the point. Also, observing sex will have much less damage to kids' mentality than seeing brains blown out on TV, which they can see every day. This is again Puritans (American Taliban) pushing their religious agenda onto general public. Boobs on TV or on street are apparently much more dangerous than violence. I wonder why.
Edit: I think there would be nothing wrong if pizza joint owner would kick them out if he dislikes this type of behavior, but getting government involved in this case is excessive.
think about unsanitary conditions this conduct created
It did not create any unsanitary conditions.
jazz_music says
the unsavory likelihood that children might observe this
They did not, so it is beyond the point. Also, observing sex will have much less damage to kids' mentality than seeing brains blown out on TV, which they can see every day. This is again Puritans (American Taliban) pushing their religious agenda onto general public. Boobs on TV or on street are apparently much more dangerous than violence. I wonder why.
Edit: I think there would be nothing wrong if pizza joint owner would kick them out if he dislikes this type of behavior, but getting government involved in this case is excessive.
15
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 2:52pm
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 2:52pm
jazz_music says
They were not charged with creating a public health hazard. They were charged with indecency. Big difference. I'm objecting to decency laws, not public health laws.
As for children observing sex, get over it. Every single child today see porn on the Internet long before puberty. Sex does not fuck children up. Bullying fucks children up. Violence fucks children up. Pollution fucks children up. Religion fucks children up. Piss-poor education fucks children up. Knowing about sex does not fuck children up. This has been empirically proved for tens of thousands of years by primitive cultures where parents literally have sex right in front of their children.
If seeing sex fucked up children, then our species would have never survived. Name one species other than our own that hides sex from their offspring. The very idea is ridiculous.
And if you really want children not to be fucked up, it makes far more sense to license parenting than it does to restrict the liberty of consenting adults.
jazz_music says
Culture can change. There are plenty of cultures in which this is common. It used to be common in western culture. Families used to sleep all in one room where the parents had sex. How do you think they used to make half a dozen kids? Private rooms is a modern invention.
In any case, the rights of individual trump majority rule in any free society.
When you think about what these lovers did, think about unsanitary conditions this conduct created and the unsavory likelihood that children might observe this and understand why such behavior should be illegal in public places especially where food is prepared and served.
They were not charged with creating a public health hazard. They were charged with indecency. Big difference. I'm objecting to decency laws, not public health laws.
As for children observing sex, get over it. Every single child today see porn on the Internet long before puberty. Sex does not fuck children up. Bullying fucks children up. Violence fucks children up. Pollution fucks children up. Religion fucks children up. Piss-poor education fucks children up. Knowing about sex does not fuck children up. This has been empirically proved for tens of thousands of years by primitive cultures where parents literally have sex right in front of their children.
If seeing sex fucked up children, then our species would have never survived. Name one species other than our own that hides sex from their offspring. The very idea is ridiculous.
And if you really want children not to be fucked up, it makes far more sense to license parenting than it does to restrict the liberty of consenting adults.
jazz_music says
You can't expect the public to consent to having children observe sex acts.
Culture can change. There are plenty of cultures in which this is common. It used to be common in western culture. Families used to sleep all in one room where the parents had sex. How do you think they used to make half a dozen kids? Private rooms is a modern invention.
In any case, the rights of individual trump majority rule in any free society.
17
socal2
2017 Sep 25, 3:20pm
FFS - are people REALLY arguing that we should allow sex and nudity in public? For real?
As if our children aren't exposed to enough porn and sexually explicit material already?
Right - we just need MOAR porn bombarding our children 24/7..........otherwise we are just like the Taliban - right?
As if our children aren't exposed to enough porn and sexually explicit material already?
Right - we just need MOAR porn bombarding our children 24/7..........otherwise we are just like the Taliban - right?
18
Ernie
2017 Sep 25, 3:29pm
socal2 says
It is already happening, anyone with access to internet can see any type of porn they want. And with respect to Taliban, yes, prohibiting toplessness for women is the same as making women wear veils/burka/whatever.
No kid has come back from Spanish beaches mentally damaged, in fact American teens enjoy their experiences there quite a lot.
Right - we just need MOAR porn bombarding our children 24/7..........otherwise we are just like the Taliban - right?
It is already happening, anyone with access to internet can see any type of porn they want. And with respect to Taliban, yes, prohibiting toplessness for women is the same as making women wear veils/burka/whatever.
No kid has come back from Spanish beaches mentally damaged, in fact American teens enjoy their experiences there quite a lot.
19
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 3:32pm
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 3:32pm
socal2 says
Yes, now try making a good, reasonable argument that we should use violence to prevent that from happening.
On my side I have all anthropology, history, and scientific evidence supporting my position. What exactly do you have supporting yours?
FFS - are people REALLY arguing that we should allow sex and nudity in public? For real?
Yes, now try making a good, reasonable argument that we should use violence to prevent that from happening.
On my side I have all anthropology, history, and scientific evidence supporting my position. What exactly do you have supporting yours?
20
socal2
2017 Sep 25, 3:38pm
Dan8267 says
Which 1st world Western civilizations allow drunk people to fuck in restaurants or public venues?
On my side I have all anthropology, history, and scientific evidence supporting my position. What exactly do you have supporting yours?
Which 1st world Western civilizations allow drunk people to fuck in restaurants or public venues?
21
Ernie
2017 Sep 25, 3:42pm
socal2 says
Go to any college football game and observe what happens after the game is over. Some inebriated students can not get to their dorms so the action happens in public spaces oftentimes. No one gets arrested, and rightly so. This is what makes America great!
Which 1st world Western civilizations allow drunk people to fuck in restaurants or public venues?
Go to any college football game and observe what happens after the game is over. Some inebriated students can not get to their dorms so the action happens in public spaces oftentimes. No one gets arrested, and rightly so. This is what makes America great!
22
socal2
2017 Sep 25, 3:48pm
drBu says
I don't think we want to emulate our societies on what drunk college kids are doing.
Go to any college football game and observe what happens after the game is over. Some students can not get to their dorms so the action happens in public spaces oftentimes. No one gets arrested, and rightly so. This is what makes America great!
I don't think we want to emulate our societies on what drunk college kids are doing.
23
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 7:57pm
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 7:57pm
socal2 says
The one that founded western civilization, ancient Greece, as well as the one that ensured the success of western civilization, Rome.
Dan8267 saysOn my side I have all anthropology, history, and scientific evidence supporting my position. What exactly do you have supporting yours?
Which 1st world Western civilizations allow drunk people to fuck in restaurants or public venues?
The one that founded western civilization, ancient Greece, as well as the one that ensured the success of western civilization, Rome.
24
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 7:59pm
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 7:59pm
socal2 says
Allowing a liberty isn't the same thing as emulation.
You still haven't given a single rational reason why we should use violence to stop people from making love in public. If you cannot give such a reason, then we should not buy your assertion that public sex should be illegal and punishable with incarceration.
I don't think we want to emulate our societies on what drunk college kids are doing.
Allowing a liberty isn't the same thing as emulation.
You still haven't given a single rational reason why we should use violence to stop people from making love in public. If you cannot give such a reason, then we should not buy your assertion that public sex should be illegal and punishable with incarceration.
25
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 8:13pm
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 8:13pm
Dan8267 says
You need to sit down with Jazz and explain to him the facts of religion. I don't think he gets it. I would, but he thinks i'm an asshole. So sad.
jazz_music saysThis is England where church and state are one thing with the queen acting as pope.
The United Kingdom today has more separation of church and state than the United States. However, this is an exception to that rule that should be corrected. The citizens of the United Kingdom demand far more separation of church and state than U.S. citizens do. American politicians get cheers when they talk about being inspired by their god, which they do often. On the rare occasion when U.K. politicians do the same, they get booed, and rightfully so.
You need to sit down with Jazz and explain to him the facts of religion. I don't think he gets it. I would, but he thinks i'm an asshole. So sad.
26
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 8:22pm
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 8:22pm
Dan8267 says
I agree with socal on this. We all love freedom, but you have to draw the line somewhere. There is a time and place for everything. The line can change over time, but exposing others, especially little children to sex is not right.
socal2 says
I don't think we want to emulate our societies on what drunk college kids are doing.
Allowing a liberty isn't the same thing as emulation.
You still haven't given a single rational reason why we should use violence to stop people from making love in public. If you cannot give such a reason, then we should not buy your assertion that public sex should be illegal and punishable with incarceration.
I agree with socal on this. We all love freedom, but you have to draw the line somewhere. There is a time and place for everything. The line can change over time, but exposing others, especially little children to sex is not right.
27
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 8:33pm
Dan8267
2017 Sep 25, 8:33pm
Strategist says
An arbitrary line should not be enforced with violence. There's a term for using the state's legal monopoly on violence to enforce "decency". It's Sharia Law. I want none of that religious bullshit in America. It's a violation of the First Amendment.
We all love freedom, but you have to draw the line somewhere.
An arbitrary line should not be enforced with violence. There's a term for using the state's legal monopoly on violence to enforce "decency". It's Sharia Law. I want none of that religious bullshit in America. It's a violation of the First Amendment.
28
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 9:00pm
Strategist
2017 Sep 25, 9:00pm
Dan8267 says
Look guys......I don't care what your beliefs are. I am an evolutionist. To me all living things are equal. I don't give a damn what species of an animal you are, or why you exist, and least of all what type of a human you may be.
We are just a speck in the chain of evolution.
I just want to enjoy my life, and the world can go to hell for all i care. Who is with me?
Strategist saysWe all love freedom, but you have to draw the line somewhere.
An arbitrary line should not be enforced with violence. There's a term for using the state's legal monopoly on violence to enforce "decency". It's Sharia Law. I want none of that religious bullshit in America. It's a violation of the First Amendment.
Look guys......I don't care what your beliefs are. I am an evolutionist. To me all living things are equal. I don't give a damn what species of an animal you are, or why you exist, and least of all what type of a human you may be.
We are just a speck in the chain of evolution.
I just want to enjoy my life, and the world can go to hell for all i care. Who is with me?
29
Ceffer
2017 Sep 25, 11:27pm
Ceffer
2017 Sep 25, 11:27pm
A real Domino's advert would have had him smashing pizza into her tweety and eating it out.
"The anchovies have competition!"
"The anchovies have competition!"
30
socal2
2017 Sep 26, 8:37am
Strategist says
Liberals have spent the last 50 years trying to breakdown basic family structure and societal norms.
"If you don't let me fuck my girlfriend in front of your daughter at Domino's you are just like the Taliban!!!!"
Is it any wonder we have record numbers of children born to single parents along with all the poverty and social dysfunction that comes with it?
The line can change over time, but exposing others, especially little children to sex is not right.
Liberals have spent the last 50 years trying to breakdown basic family structure and societal norms.
"If you don't let me fuck my girlfriend in front of your daughter at Domino's you are just like the Taliban!!!!"
Is it any wonder we have record numbers of children born to single parents along with all the poverty and social dysfunction that comes with it?
31
Dan8267
2017 Sep 26, 8:45am
Dan8267
2017 Sep 26, 8:45am
socal2 says
A lie. Only conservatives have broken down family structure and family values. They have done so with
1. The war on drugs.
2. Allowing cops to rape people with impunity.
3. The deterioration of the middle class.
4. The suppression of wages forcing both parents to work just to make ends meet.
5.No fault Always the man's fault divorce curiosity of Ronald Reagan.
Name one fucking thing that liberals have done to destroy families. Go on so that I can tear you a new one.
socal2 says
The war on drugs is the number one reason for this.
Liberals have spent the last 50 years trying to breakdown basic family structure and societal norms.
A lie. Only conservatives have broken down family structure and family values. They have done so with
1. The war on drugs.
2. Allowing cops to rape people with impunity.
3. The deterioration of the middle class.
4. The suppression of wages forcing both parents to work just to make ends meet.
5.
Name one fucking thing that liberals have done to destroy families. Go on so that I can tear you a new one.
socal2 says
Is it any wonder we have record numbers of children born to single parents along with all the poverty and social dysfunction that comes with it?
The war on drugs is the number one reason for this.
A couple who had sex in Domino's face prison after a video of their 'obscene and disgusting' was shown in court.
CCTV footage of Daniella Hirst and Craig Smith having sex on the counter while waiting for a 12inch pepperoni pizza with stuffed crust was shown at Scarborough Magistrates Court today.
Hirst, 29, sat at the back of the court with her hands over her eyes in shame through the more explicit parts of the 18-minute clip.
The prosecutor said: 'We view this offence as so serious that it passes the custody threshold.'
The video showed the couple ordering food and messing around with a yellow cleaning cone before Hirst performs oral sex on Smith, 31.
The pair then have sex leaning on the counter close to the till.
Staff can be seen working in the kitchen as deliverymen come and go throughout.
Hirst pleaded guilty to 'committing an act outraging public decency by behaving in an indecent manner'.
Hirst described her behaviour as 'horrendous' and told the court she 'cringed' when watching the CCTV footage back during police interview.
As she left the court having changed out of her pink dungarees she said she was 'fuming'.
North Yorkshire Police were made aware of the footage by the local media after it was posted on Twitter by a member of the Domino's staff.
The couple, from Bridlington, East Yorkshire, had spent the weekend drinking and celebrating Smith's birthday when they got the train to Scarborough on February 25 2016.
Prosecuting, Neil Holdsworth said: 'This charge is committing an act outraging public decency by behaving in an indecent manner.
'This case is about an occasion where the two defendants engaged in sexual activity in a Domino's pizza outlet which was open to the public, with members of staff present.'
Defending, Scott McLaughlin attempted to have the CCTV footage thrown out but magistrates rejected his request.
In mitigation, he said: 'This case speaks for itself. Clearly, they were in drink and let their exuberant spirits get the better of them.
'There is nothing sinister in relation to the acts themselves, they are quite guarded. They have not been brazen in their actions.
He added: 'Miss Hirst's dirty laundry has been aired in public.'
Magistrate Angela Beardshall said: 'The prosecution has not obtained this footage illegally although it may well be it was distributed improperly.