by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 61 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
We literally have to have an increase of 1C in the next decade to match the average of 102 historical IPCC forecasts.
IPCC Climate Models are wayyyyyy off from observed reality. Until their predictions fall closer to observed reality, they should be discounted.
Sprawl is very energy intensive.
Onvacation saysInteresting? Makes me wonder about the methodology. Do you have a source for the "isotopic signature" study?
Do you have Google on your computer?
TwoScoopsPlissken saysIPCC Climate Models are wayyyyyy off from observed reality. Until their predictions fall closer to observed reality, they should be discounted.
There is even a gif debunking your image:
Why a gif, if only to disallow any serious dissection of the displayed information...
A manually controlled slideshow would have given more validity to the subject matter.
because of the nature of organic plant decay that emits CO2, such a mass spectrometry analysis is bogus.
So, it's just another line of evidence, strengthening the case for what should be obvious.
So, it's just another line of evidence, strengthening the case for what should be obvious.
BlueSardine saysWhy a gif, if only to disallow any serious dissection of the displayed information...
A manually controlled slideshow would have given more validity to the subject matter.
What next? Are you going to say that the creator of the gif drives a red car, and only people with blue cars are trustworthy?
So charts displayed for 2 seconds constitutes irrefutable evidence. I see...
Why do you think the Earth is cooling now?
The earth is cooling because of the suns diminishing output.
I see. So how much is the sun's output falling?
Google solar cycles. It will be educational!
in the past:
How large is the dust bowl globally?
You do know that Skeptical science is one of those alarmist sites that scares children? Don't you?
Onvacation saysWhy is the earth cooling now?
Why do you think the Earth is cooling now?
It sure looked to me like the ice core proxies are underreporting CO2. Very possible because of how ice melts and refreezes several times before becoming permanent ice (if ever), and why (ie atmospheric temp OR weight pressure)
Not much. Just a little more than it was warming. Not much.
Google solar cycles. It will be educational!
They claim that less than 2 degrees (manipulated) over 2 centuries is alarming
Carbon Doomsday
We see CO2 concentrations increasing.
Not sure again why you talk of 2 degrees.
What I have heard is ASSUMING we limit the CO2 increase to double what it was before the industrial era,
Heraclitusstudent saysWe see CO2 concentrations increasing.
Wouldn't you agree that co2 is insignificant compared to h2o as a greenhouse gas?
OK. LESS than 2 degrees warming over the last 2 centuries.
Alarmists seldom talk about real numbers.
Wouldn't you agree that co2 is insignificant compared to h2o as a greenhouse gas?
So what? It's CO2 we add.
Wouldn't you agree that co2 is insignificant compared to h2o as a greenhouse gas?
Onvacation saysWouldn't you agree that co2 is insignificant compared to h2o as a greenhouse gas?
So what? It's CO2 we add.
"Alarmists" are not "alarmists" about the past.
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 61 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,235,782 comments by 14,778 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, mell, WookieMan online now