by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 62 - 97 of 97 Search these comments
A very little amount.
Those that forget their history are condemned to repeat it.
anon_20fca says
A very little amount.
And a little goes a long way..
Water vapor already absorbs outgoing IR radiations for given frequencies. This is part of normal climate.
The next 200yrs will look like the past 200?
Unlikely. For very obvious reasons.
Onvacation saysThose that forget their history are condemned to repeat it.
What does that even mean?
CO2 absorbs frequencies that are different from water vapor. Frequencies that previously were leaking out in space.
What happens when you fill a bucket that has a hole and you plug the hole? It fills up. In this case with heat.
Heraclitusstudent says
CO2 absorbs frequencies that are different from water vapor. Frequencies that previously were leaking out in space.
What happens when you fill a bucket that has a hole and you plug the hole? It fills up. In this case with heat.
Do you have a source for the "Plugged hole theory" ofglobal warmingclimate change?
Water vapor also traps heat in, by way larger margins than CO2 does.
What does that even mean?
Really? Google it.
Anyone trying to predict the future is most likely wrong.
anon_dd91d saysWater vapor also traps heat in, by way larger margins than CO2 does.
I've just said it above. So what?
anon_dd91d sayswhat is the original source of that heat?
Is that some sort of trick question?
So what?
Apparently that blows up the narrative that CO2 is causing the rise in heat, right?
anon_9ece2 saysSo what?
Apparently that blows up the narrative that CO2 is causing the rise in heat, right?
No it doesn't.
Water vapor was there before, and, I'll repeat, was always a normal part of the climate.
The only reason for it to change is precisely because more CO2 means more heat means more water vapor.
more CO2 means more heat
Heraclitusstudent saysmore CO2 means more heat
How much more? Why has the rising co2 level NOT led to a correlating increase in temperature?
CO2 increases could be logarithmic; it takes ever-increasing amounts of CO2 to raise the temperature.
There's no chance that MORE water vapor comes from more irrigation, more swimming pools, more car washes, more open reservoirs
anon_def08 saysThere's no chance that MORE water vapor comes from more irrigation, more swimming pools, more car washes, more open reservoirs
Seriously? pools?
Water is water. It's there.
Are you aware that a vast majority of this planet is covered with water,
Water is water. It's there.
Here are people who seriously think that scientists in 200 countries could consistently lie about the greenhouse effect of CO2
What we have is people who DON’T WANT to believe the large amount of evidence
One day it’s the sun.
Today it’s water vapor
Fear, Uncertainty, doubt....
What's the surface area of all these pools across the world? How much evaporation takes place every day?
It's really very simple, follow the money, who pays these scientists and what's the party line they have to follow to keep getting their paychecks. The ole "peer review" process.
Who paid the Economists in 200 countries, almost none of whom predicted the financial crisis?
Any other question?
anon_def08 saysThere's no chance that MORE water vapor comes from more irrigation, more swimming pools, more car washes, more open reservoirs
Seriously? pools?
Are you aware that a vast majority of this planet is covered with water, and that water falls regularly from the sky in most places?
Water is water. It's there.
There's no chance that MORE water vapor comes from more irrigation, more swimming pools, more car washes, more open reservoirs, more man made lakes, more water retention pits, more mining, more industrial uses of water, more sewerage treatment plants, more asphalt and concrete allowing more water to evaporate versus drain into the ground, more fires requiring firefighting using water, etc. etc. etc., all due to HIGHER population using MORE water??
Burning any hydrocarbon (including "clean" natural gas) produces both CO2 and water vapor. Since burning fossil fuel adds the far more potent H2O to the atmosphere, why no alarm about our "Hydro Footprint?"
What we have is people who DON’T WANT to believe the large amount of evidence,
CO2 is heavier than air. It is not going to concentrate at altitude where the "air is thin." In fact, CO2 is so heavy that a sudden large concentration will displace up the Oxygen and cause suffocation.
« First « Previous Comments 62 - 97 of 97 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,235,781 comments by 14,778 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, gabbar, stereotomy online now