« First « Previous Comments 93 - 108 of 108 Search these comments
Revenues are up 9% from last year, where do revenues come from? Tax withholding on wages. Even though the lower withholding rates kicked in this year, which means the Feds get LESS income from income taxes, the revenues are still up 9%. If wages were dropping, like the OP claims, the revenue numbers would be in the minuses, even before the lower withholding rates
If you don't change your W4, your withholdings are exactly the same as they have always been in previous tax years regardless of the new tax plan.
The 9% increase is almost exclusively due to wages. Acting like less is being withheld from paychecks and that there was still a 9% increase in tax revenues is disingenuous. People are withholding the exact same amount as they would prior to the new tax plan.
To claim people are withholding less and the revenues are up is garbage.
ome vocational talent and are willing to put sweat in and learn such a skill you're basically set.
The fact remains we won't know how this all plays out until we pay all the people back that overpaid on their taxes.
Revenues are up 9% from last year, where do revenues come from? Tax withholding on wages. Even though the lower withholding rates kicked in this year, which means the Feds get LESS income from income taxes, the revenues are still up 9%. If wages were dropping, like the OP claims, the revenue numbers would be in the minuses, even before the lower withholding rates.
How much would revenues to the .Gov be up if the old, higher withholding tables were still active? Probably MORE than 9%.
We know exactly how it plays out. It's printed on everyone weekly pay stub now. They see exactly how much tax was taken out. You don't need to wait until the end of the year to see that.
extra $22 per week in their paycheck on average from the tax cut. Wow a night out at mcdonalds for a family of 4.
You really should read articles before you comment on them.
I'm missing something here. 40 (24+7+9) identify as dem, 46 (11+6+19) idenify as rep and you say the poll is padded with dems. How does that work exaclty?
bob2356 saysI'm missing something here. 40 (24+7+9) identify as dem, 46 (11+6+19) idenify as rep and you say the poll is padded with dems. How does that work exaclty?
The way I learned math is that (11+6+19) = 36, but this is how math is taught in my state. Apparently it's taught differently in others....
So riddle me this. If hourly wages are down, then where is the increase in tax revenue coming from? Did salaries jump suddenly and abruptly on a wide scale? Hmmm. I wonder why the stock market is barely staying even with huge buybacks? Anyone out there cashing out their stocks and taking profits? Hmm. Dividends up 15% to record high. First q 109 billion in dividends. Taxable dividends.
Hourly wages down, salaries really didn't change,
From the bea tables:
bob2356 saysHourly wages down, salaries really didn't change,
Look who's back to show us more awesome math skills, and wrong assumptions.
You should really read the WHOLE thread before posting additional nonsense.
Ok where is the 9% growth in individual income tax collections coming from? Feel free to provide the CORRECT assumptions. Not that it will ever happen.
OK, how's this?
https://www.cbo.gov/system/files?file=2018-07/54126-MBR.pdf
You should really read the WHOLE thread before posting additional nonsense.
MrMagic saysOK, how's this?
The question is what part of individual income taxes is driving the 9% increase if wages are only slightly up,
https://www.cbo.gov/system/files?file=2018-07/54126-MBR.pdf
Need help reading?
« First « Previous Comments 93 - 108 of 108 Search these comments
Changes in real wages: