patrick.net

It's the crook of the elbow, it's crisis actors, its' thermite, it's the grassy knoll.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Lewis proposes that YouTube should consider not only reviewing the content of the channels identified in the report, but the people they host and what their guests say.

“YouTube is choosing to continue to endorse the content of these people who are delivering really harmful messages,” she said. “It would be an opportune time to make their standards stricter for people that have that level of influence.”

There is an urgent need to create a committee that looks through Youtube content and approves politically acceptable content for publishing. I propose naming that committee Glavlit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Directorate_for_the_Protection_of_State_Secrets_in_the_Press). An organ then would be needed to control Glavlit as to remove any possible contamination by secret free-thinkers or unbelievers. I propose a diverse, minority and womyn staffpersoned committee which would be approved by Congress, and we could name that committee Politburo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politburo_of_the_Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union). Additionally, if your video is banned from Youtube, it will automatically result in a ban on Twatter, Instagram, Facebook, and all other "platforms". Additionally, repeat offenders will be removed to re-education in so-called GULAG (I have not figured out what the abbreviation means, but I like how it sounds). Only then, after silencing the Enemies of Minorities, womyn, and transgendered, the peace and nirvana will embrace the hupersonity.

The Mother Jones article was even worse as it contained outright lies like this gem:
Over 10,000 active viewers watched a January debate between white nationalist Richard Spencer and a conspiracy theorist who goes by the name Sargon of Akkad. The discussion topic was whether science proves whites are more intelligent because of genetic superiority. There was little disagreement; both sides agreed on the superiority of the white race.
It does seem like Sargon (aka Carl Benjamin) has grounds to sue for libel. Here's his response video:www.youtube.com/embed/Ypt_pnpJLzY

A diverse set of alternative opinions is the enemy of the State. The Great Socialist Paradise will not tolerate this divisive dialog!

KILL THE LIBERTARIANS! KILL THEM ALL!

EBGuy says

Over 10,000 active viewers watched a January debate between white nationalist Richard Spencer and a conspiracy theorist who goes by the name Sargon of Akkad. The discussion topic was whether science proves whites are more intelligent because of genetic superiority. There was little disagreement; both sides agreed on the superiority of the white race.

Yeah, nice of them to mention that both Sargon and Styxhexenhammer were opposed to Spencer, mocking his idea of voluntary repatriation of Blacks to Africa, what if somebody only has one black grandparent so who gets to stay, etc.

"They talked, and you can't talk to NAZIS without being one of them!"

The left played the game very wrong since 2008. They've been all about quashing opinions, not allowing people to think, they've become the fascist they pretend to hate. It's hurting them in the youth demographic which is naturally rebellious and Gen Z is slated to be more right leaning than the two previous generations before it. That's not by accident.

The more the left acts totalitarian and allows Islam, LGBQTABCDEFG, and overall weirdos to take over the party, the less attractive it becomes to Gen Z'ers.

I think one of the points of the graph is scare tactics; If you're not Alt-Right, you're Alt-Right adjacent. Nevermind that the core of the IDW (save Peterson) is Jewish ... sigh.

I have a feeling they're going to be asking for the head of Russell Brand very soon...

I didn't even notice poor Tim Pool in the center of the graph. Insanity.
www.youtube.com/embed/5-A_aNMe1Wk

I want you for the Alternative Influence Network. Enlist now.
www.youtube.com/embed/C5l2a-qCE3o