Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »


Project Veritas Just Nailed Lying Democrat Phil Bredesen Running For US Senate in Tennessee

By TrumpingTits follow TrumpingTits   2018 Oct 10, 7:48pm 2,340 views   12 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    

(Tennessee) Project Veritas Action Fund has released a second undercover video from campaigns during this 2018 election season. This report exposes Tennessee staffers from Phil Bredesen’s U.S. Senate campaign revealing his willingness to court moderate voters through deceit. This was especially evidenced by Bredesen’s recent statement suggesting he would, if he was already in the Senate, vote to confirm now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Says YES on Kavanaugh in Vote-Grab, But Staffers Say He Wouldn’t “It’s politics.”
Lie Was “a Political Move” to Appear “Moderate” Rather Than Liberal – Bredesen Campaign Is “all here” to Run Against Trump, “he hates Trump”
Staffer Confides: “we’re trying to make it so it’s not about Democrats…” BUT “he’ll be a good Democrat”
Blue Wave: “This isn’t about everything else… this is for the Blue Wave…” “we don’t say that out of these walls”
Bredesen Staff Thinks Tennessee Voters Are “Ignorant”

“We don’t say that out of these walls.” Phil Bredesen’s Staff Says He Is Lying About Kavanaugh Vote in Undercover Video. “It’s a political move.”

1   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 10, 7:59pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

hahaha-make this fella head of the FBI!!
2   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch   ignore (52)   2018 Oct 10, 8:36pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Great. This means every Democrat in AMERICA! is going to the gas chamber as soon as O'Keefe sends their names and addresses to Academi for them to be rounded up and liquidated.

3   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2018 Oct 11, 5:36am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

All they do is fucking Lie. you know how Liberals are.
4   Goran_K   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 11, 5:46am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

He’s so behind in the polls anyway but this should put him safely away.
5   WookieMan   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 11, 7:38am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

@4:20ish. Someone paint that fucking wall. Embarrassing.
6   WookieMan   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 11, 7:42am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Also, serious question here. How does Project Veritas record video and audio without the other parties consent? Is that illegal? Thought it was. That camera work indicates it was hidden to me.
7   bob2356   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 11, 9:00am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Really digging deep for the fake outrage of the day.
8   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   ignore (6)   2018 Oct 11, 9:34am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

WookieMan says
Also, serious question here. How does Project Veritas record video and audio without the other parties consent? Is that illegal? Thought it was. That camera work indicates it was hidden to me.

Depends on the state, but generally if it’s in a public location....and that includes govt buildings, business, etc, there is no expectation of privacy.
9   WookieMan   ignore (5)   2018 Oct 11, 11:04am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

MockingbirdKiller says
If you want to worry about something, worry about the poor Millennial bastards on that guy's staff who fucked up by telling someone shit they that made very clear shouldn't have been told to that someone but they did anyway.

I'm not too worried about any of it. The staffers had their opinions and spoke them. I actually appreciate that. Could have just said, "yes, Kavanaugh is great and a yes vote is great." (and yes, I know he was talking about "how" he would vote if in office)

Not everyone, in any type of organization is going to agree with leadership all the time. Hell, sometimes the confrontation can cause good things to happen as long as it's not toxic. That said, his organization/people don't like what he did, so he didn't communicate well with them. So yes, he's going to lose votes for sure because of this.

Remind me not to move to TN though. Too lazy to look it up, but in a non-governmental building in IL, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to record the audio without the other parties consent. Or at least record and then post publicly for a non-criminal investigation. The journalist I'm pretty sure would have to notify here in IL if they're recording audio. As you've said, they have lawyers for it and I presume it was done legally in TN and not IL. Still seems a bit shady, but I really don't care one way or the other.
10   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2018 Oct 11, 12:02pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Iraq has WMD.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
11   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 11, 2:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Newscaster: "BREAKING. Donald Trump witnessed walking across the Potomac like Jesus Christ!"
Democrat response: "See! The SOB can't even swim! Impeach him for incompetence!"

Or - "Climate Change caused the river to freeze over!!"
12   NDrLoR   ignore (0)   2018 Oct 11, 2:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

WookieMan says
How does Project Veritas record video and audio without the other parties consent
It differs in ever state. Some states only one person has to be aware of the recording, which is obviously the one doing the recording, so it would be legal.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions