« First « Previous Comments 47 - 54 of 54 Search these comments
Rin saysangry parents
do not usually resort to child sacrifice, unless they are Muslim. Islam is the last major religion to command child sacrifice. We see it across the Islamic world, and wherever Muslims migrate. Jews and Christians do not practice child sacrifice, because Leviticus prohibits child sacrifice specifically and the new testament prohibits killing generally. Jews and Christians might disown their children, even mourn them as if dead, but only Muslims resort to actually murdering them.
And in the classic manual of Islamic law, Umdat as-Salik wa ‘Uddat an-Nasik, we read:
Qisas is obligatory on whoever kills a person purely intentionally and aggressively (that is, not in self-defense). But qisas is not applicable on children or the insane under any circumstances, nor is it applicable on a Muslim for killing a kafir, nor on a free man for killing a slave, nor on a dhimmi for killing an apostate, nor on a father or a mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their child, or their child’s children.
Narrated Suraqah bin Malik bin [Ju'shum]: "The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) judged that the son is to suffer retaliation for [killing] his father, but the father is not to suffer retaliation for [killing] his son."
Grade : Da'if (Darussalam)
Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1399 In-book reference : Book 16, Hadith 15 English translation : Vol. 1, Book 14, Hadith 1399
It was narrated from Ibn 'Abbas that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “A father should not be killed for his son.”
Grade : Da'if (Darussalam)
English reference : Vol. 3, Book 21, Hadith 2661 Arabic reference : Book 21, Hadith 2763
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: that the Prophet (ﷺ) said: 'The Hudud are not carried in the Masjid, and the father is not killed for the son.'
nor is it applicable on a Muslim for killing a kafir
It is perfectly permissible for a parent to kill his own child under Islamic law:
bob2356 saysiNice job with that strawman. Keep on making shit up and claiming I said it.. The lengths you go to to create strawmen and misdirection are impressive.
Bob, it's not a strawman, nor is it Whataboutery. It's a direct regurgitation of your own words:
It's okay to execute Gays and Witches - and apparently unmarried Princesses for adultery - if you have a Trial based on Shari'a Law and Islamism. But not Muslim Brotherhood shills who are trying to pick up paperwork to divorce their wife in Saudi Arabia - so they only have to pay 130 days support.
My direct words were it's not front page news when someone is tried and executed according to a nations laws. The rest of the shit you just keep making up. Show one single place where I said anything was "ok" or not "ok"
« First « Previous Comments 47 - 54 of 54 Search these comments
Turkey was the great loser in WWI. If it had been able to hold on to Saudi Arabia and Iraq it would have controlled most of that oil and been a major power today. Now it may be trying to get back some measure of that influence by telling the truth about Khashoggi's death, slowly, in pieces that keep it in the news over and over.