Comments 1 - 36 of 36 Search these comments
A 2% tax on wealth can replace a 35% tax on income.But what about double taxation? You've worked hard, lived frugally, saved, paid income taxes, only to be taxed again?
Patrick saysA 2% tax on wealth can replace a 35% tax on income.But what about double taxation? You've worked hard, lived frugally, saved, paid income taxes, only to be taxed again?
Yes time to do away with Medicare, fuck them old people, right?
A 2% tax on wealth can replace a 35% tax on income.
Patrick saysA 2% tax on wealth can replace a 35% tax on income.But what about double taxation? You've worked hard, lived frugally, saved, paid income taxes, only to be taxed again?
Yeah, a wealth tax really just sticks it to retirees living off of savings. It would create a negative incentive to save at all, which would be terrible for so many facets of the economy.
I know I'd fight it hard. Or take my hard-earned savings and GTFO to another land.
MrMagic saysthe Boomers saved, scrimped and put money away to pay for their bills in retirement
ROFL... almost spilled my milkshake.
Yes time to do away with Medicare, fuck them old people, right?
Boomers should embrace real Nordic capitalism:Death panels for boomers. Problem solved. May I see your party affiliation, old man?
Ättestupa (Swedish for kin/clan precipice) is the mythical practice of senicide during Nordic prehistoric times, where elderly people are said to have thrown themselves, or were thrown, to their deaths. According to legend, this was done when old people were unable to support themselves or assist in a household. Though there are many places in the Nordic countries that are said to have been used as ättestupa, it is now thought that the notion of ättestupa is a persistent myth.
Exactly..
Disband a program that they paid into for 45+ years.... That's the ticket!
MrMagic saysExactly..
Disband a program that they paid into for 45+ years.... That's the ticket!
Medicare, on the other hand, spent $153 billion but took in just $52 billion. That's a shortfall of 66%; that is, two thirds of it is unfunded. You would have to more than triple the Medicare Tax Rate in order to bring it to parity.
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3467894
Seems that Medicare is ripe for being abolished. Boomfucks consume 3x more than is being paid in.
Medicare, on the other hand, spent $153 billion but took in just $52 billion. That's a shortfall of 66%; that is, two thirds of it is unfunded. You would have to more than triple the Medicare Tax Rate in order to bring it to parity.
Boomfucks consume 3x more than is being paid in.
Barking up the wrong tree there, young fellow.
The big-pharmfucks and insurancefucks are in the other tree.
Medicare, on the other hand, spent $153 billion but took in just $52 billion.
Where's all the money that was paid in the other past decades?
The reason that's happening is because the lazy Millennials (who is the largest generation now) are sitting on their asses in mommy's basement, instead being out working and being productive, like the boomers were at that age.
Get those lazy asses paying into the system like their parents did.
d6rB saysBoomfucks consume 3x more than is being paid in.
Not quite, maybe the generation before them did. Hell, not even half of the boomers have reach retirement age yet, they are STILL paying into the system.
If half are still paying into the system, and system is generating only 1/3 of money required to pay for them, then either there are too many benefits, or tax is too low, or everyone is being screwed by health care providers. Or a combination of all three.
Boomers created the laws, so a YUUGE portion of these problems can be blamed on them.
Also, it seems that Medicare is running deficits at least since 2000, that is way before boomers started retiring en masse
Wrong again. Medicare was formed in 1965, the average boomer was like 9 years old.
Also, it seems that Medicare is running deficits at least since 2000, that is way before boomers started retiring en masse
OK, so you want to blame that deficit on boomers, who hadn't even retired yet?
How does that work? Is that Liberal Logic, by any chance?
but Boomers are never wrong (sorry if you are one). You're fighting a losing battle, well, just because.
Argument: Boomers have already accumulated wealth and, in general, their salad days of earnings are behind them. They've drunk your milkshake, and now want you to pay for their medical care and other goodies. Socialism, and taxing income, would have been verboten when they were earning, but now, let Mikey pay.
The idealism of the young, and their financial illiteracy, means they are ripe to be taken advantage of, once agin.