4
0

Covington Catholic teen sues CNN for $275 million for falsely attacking, vilifying and bullying him to push an anti-Trump agenda


 invite response                
2019 Mar 14, 8:08am   785 views  3 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6802469/Covington-Catholic-teen-sues-CNN-275MILLION.html

The Covington Catholic teenager who was vilified over a viral clip of a face-off with a Native American activist has sued CNN for $275million over its coverage of the incident.

Attorneys for 16-year-old Nicholas Sandmann filed the federal lawsuit on Tuesday in the Eastern District of Kentucky, seeking $75million in compensatory and $200million in punitive damages.

Sandmann was widely portrayed as a racist over a January 18 video clip of him wearing a Make America Great Again hat and standing face-to-face with Nathan Phillips, who claimed he'd been surrounded and abused by the group of Catholic teens who were on a school trip.

Extensive video told a very different story, however, indicating that the teens had been abused with racist and homophobic slurs by a group of Black Hebrew Israelites, before Phillips waded into the middle of the school group with his drum.


Good for him. I hope the legal system works. CNN should pay.

Comments 1 - 3 of 3        Search these comments

1   Shaman   2019 Mar 14, 8:11am  

I hope he breaks the damned Leftist media and hurts their oligarch owners substantially. I want jury decisions and establishment of precedents, not quiet settlements. Let the show go on! MAGA boy is gon’ Be rich!
2   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 29, 12:33am  

BREAKING: A federal judge in Kentucky has reopened the $250 million defamation case filed by Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann against the Washington Post after dismissing it in July, allowing the lawsuit to proceedhttps://t.co/hkLvNp5N3b

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) October 28, 2019
3   HeadSet   2019 Oct 29, 10:06am  

U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman agreed to permit discovery on three of 33 allegedly libelous statements in The Post’s coverage

Note, only 3 of the 33 libel statements. And then the judge will throw even those out after a quick summary judgement.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions