« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 93 Next » Last » Search these comments
we're still beating new temp records on a regular basis and all evidence shows it is happening.link when you make comments like this please.
do you really think a .8° temp increase is a problem?
Finally, where's the big sea level rises?
From CBOETrader's article:
The recent study showed—through simulations—that humans narrowly missed an ice age just before the Industrial Revolution and probably postponed the next one by at least 50,000 years. Researchers note that with the large quantities of carbon dioxide pumped into the atmosphere in the last two centuries, the “probability of glacial inception during the next 100,000 years is notably reduced.”
Laying the baseline 'scuses for when all those model predicted temperature and sea level rises do not occur.
CBOEtrader saysdo you really think a .8° temp increase is a problem?
Ah so we moved the goal post from "Show me we're beating new temp records on a regular basis." to "explain me why 0.8 degree is a problem"?
Do you think 2 degree is a problem? 5 degree? 10 degree?
Just wondering.
Because for the past 15 yrs I've been reading people like you on Internet forums that GW is a fad, that such and such is the last nail of the coffin of that hoax, etc, etc...
In the meantime, we're still beating new temp records on a regular basis and all evidence shows it is happening.
At what point do you admit defeat?
moved the goal post
Why argue with people that don't know what a trend is ?
If anyone does bring up solutions, just push the discussion back to arguing with deniers.
"What if it is a big hoax and we hike the cost of energy for nothing?"
All your personal attacks don't hide the fact that the temperature has not really gone up.
I've never argued against climate change.
socal2 saysThe worst thing that would happen is the attitude which is built on "whatever" part. "Let's spend money on something, as long as it sounds good to our camp and we can wrap it up nicely"....THe worst thing that would happen is that governments do some subsidies (profitable long term investment) and accelerate the advance of cheap solar, or safer nuclear or whatever.
Meanwhile, you attempt to secure ideological superiority by using umbrella term "whatever". It doesn't work like that, but the attempt has been noted.
It doesn't work like that, but the attempt has been noted.
"What if it is a big hoax and we hike the cost of energy for nothing?"
- Economic decline
- Famine
- War
- Genocide
- Poverty
Look at Germany and what they've done with solar and wind. Arguably too much too fast, but it's not cause massive strife.
In the meantime, we're still beating new temp records on a regular basis and all evidence shows it is happening.
"If the stock market is increasing, how can every day not be the highest the market has ever been ?"
Why argue with people that don't know what a trend is ?
Heraclitusstudent saysmoved the goal post
You fell in to your own trap.
You're arguing with people that are in an anti science anti knowledge bubble, that is, when it pleases them. It's not just Brietbart and Fox, it's twitter and social media - the same monster that helped create the young SJW wackos.
Also, I think there is a personality type, that loves the idea of thinking they knew things before others SO MUCH, that in this case, they feel that if somehow climate change is not happening, they will get much more "I told you so" pleasure from thinking to themselves, and telling other for the rest of their lives that they knew all along, than the shame and embarrassment of having parroted the AGW denial ...
WE don't have infinite fossil fuels
« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 93 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-18/the-world-will-get-half-its-power-from-wind-and-solar-by-2050