Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »


Ninth Circuit Court Once Again Sucks Trump Dick

By OccasionalCortex follow OccasionalCortex   2019 Jul 15, 1:16pm 310 views   2 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    

Ninth Circuit Court says it’s OK for feds to favor non-sanctuary cities in funding

President Trump’s Justice Department “has reasonably determined that illegal immigration enforcement is a public safety issue” that can be addressed through “the principles of community policing,” Judge Sandra Ikuta said in the 2-1 ruling. Despite evidence that crime rates for undocumented immigrants are no higher than rates for the general population, she said, the Justice Department was entitled to conclude that “removing aliens who are convicted or suspected of crimes makes communities safer.”

Past rulings on similar issues have gone against the Trump administration. In August, another Ninth Circuit panel rejected Trump’s attempt to withhold all federal funding from San Francisco and other sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with immigration officers.

“This ruling reverses a lawless decision that enabled Sanctuary City policies, putting the safety and security of all Americans in harm’s way,” the White House said in a statement

1   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Jul 15, 1:35pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Sanctuary cities are obstruction of justice by design.
2   Tenpoundbass   ignore (16)   2019 Jul 15, 1:42pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

These Circuit Judges that rule on National issues so carelessly with partisan ire, should be impeached.

There's no premise for many of these rulings against Trump.

Roberts should be impeached as well. Obama didn't ask for permission nor did he ask for permission to remove the Census question, Nancy Pelosi didn't ask SCOTUS if it was OK if She laughed in Americas face about not reading Obama's lie, we had many characters on record, laughing at the Stupid American voters, for the reason for Obamacare. Laughing at how it would hurt them, but they are too stupid to realize it.

Roberts siding with it twice is nothing short of Judicial hackery. How much was he paid?

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions