Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

3
0

If a Juvi does Time, Welfare Hos must lose benefits for the Crime

By NoCoupForYou follow NoCoupForYou   2019 Aug 7, 4:01pm 315 views   10 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


It's time to halt welfare benefits if Teenagers living in welfare ho families commit crimes.

Bitches don't have no Job, so they have all the time in the world to monitor Jamal Junior.

Therefore, there can be no excuse.
1   OccasionalCortex   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 7, 5:01pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

That's not how it works. Uncle Sam is the new Sugar Daddy. For female civil servants, he's totally a replacement hubby. This is why women comprise like 70% of civil service jobs, fed/state/local.

This is why they vote Democrat. Because they know if real bonafide conservatives should get real power, the budget slashing will hurt them faster than you can say "I divorce you!" three times in a row, Sharia law-style.

For welfare queens, it's the same thing only w/o the actual hubby. Think 'common law wives' of the government. And they have a lot more to lose if welfare gets slashed/abolished, too.

Then there is that little matter in the Constitution that bars anyone from being punished for the crimes of their relatives.
2   Ceffer   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 7, 5:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

They think that by having a baby, the dad will wander back to look at his little bundle of criminal genes joy once in a while and maybe stick around.
3   Booger   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 7, 5:42pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OccasionalCortex says
Then there is that little matter in the Constitution that bars anyone from being punished for the crimes of their relatives.


Spending time in jail and losing welfare benefits are two different things.
4   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 7, 5:54pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OccasionalCortex says
Then there is that little matter in the Constitution that bars anyone from being punished for the crimes of their relatives.


Fining the parents of children, even truants who commit no other 'crime', is normal in many places already. Here the fine is the reduction of (cash) benefits. There are plenty of charities to make up any shortfall.
5   Shaman   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 7, 6:22pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Kamala should be all for it. She wanted to jail the parents of truants.
6   HEYYOU   ignore (44)   2019 Aug 7, 9:03pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

So how many Rep/Cons on handouts & don't have a govt. or any job?
7   OccasionalCortex   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 8, 1:00pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Booger says
Spending time in jail and losing welfare benefits are two different things.


Who sez?

'Corruption of Blood' doesn't pertain to just jail but also loss of reputation, assets, legal rights, etc.

The US constitutional provision prohibits declaring people guilty of crimes by legislative act, and prohibits sentences for crimes that take property or rights from the family or heirs of the convicted person, even in cases of treason. At least that is how it has been interpreted. Fines may be levied, but may only fall on the actual property of the person convicted.
8   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2019 Aug 8, 1:12pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Teachers should take pay cuts if their district keeps churning out Welfare losers.
9   Reality   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 8, 5:14pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OccasionalCortex says
'Corruption of Blood' doesn't pertain to just jail but also loss of reputation, assets, legal rights, etc.


The proposal here is not "corruption of blood" but failure as parents to supervise juveniles. While adults are solely responsible for their own actions, parents can be held responsible for the actions of their juvenile children (failure to supervise). Furthermore, if the welfare recipient is receiving benefit on account of raising the juvenile, the failure to supervise the juvenile can certainly be ground for removing the welfare benefit. In fact, during the time when the Juvenile is incarcerated, the parent should certainly lose the housing benefits, food stamps and etc. given on account of having to raise the juvenile who is no longer living in the household.

On top of that, monthly benefit check/payment should be conditioned on the mother staying on long-term contraceptive (a simple injection in the arm now can stay effective for 3 years now). If any man loves the welfare mother enough to want to impregnate her, he should be able to take her off the welfare roll before making new babies with her.
10   Ceffer   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 8, 6:05pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tenpoundbass says
Teachers should take pay cuts if their district keeps churning out Welfare losers.

I thought the teachers WERE 90 percent welfare losers, just a higher organized echelon.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions