Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

3
1

Google Insider Laptop delivered to DOJ - with 950 pages of Algos and Notes

By NoCoupForYou follow NoCoupForYou   2019 Aug 13, 7:41pm 378 views   12 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


A former Google insider claiming the company created algorithms to hide its political bias within artificial intelligence platforms – in effect targeting particular words, phrases and contexts to promote, alter, reference or manipulate perceptions of Internet content – delivered roughly 950 pages of documents to the Department of Justice’s Antitrust division Friday.

The former Google insider, who has already spoken in to the nonprofit organization Project Veritas, met with SaraACarter.com on several occasions last week. He was interviewed in silhouette, to conceal his identity, in group’s latest film, which they say exposes bias inside the social media platform.

Several weeks prior, the insider mailed a laptop to the DOJ containing the same information delivered on Friday, they said. The former insider is choosing to remain anonymous until Project Verita’s James O’Keefe reveals his identity tomorrow (Wednesday).

He told this reporter on his recent trip to Washington D.C. that the documents he turned over to the Justice Department will provide proof that Google has been manipulating the algorithms and the evidence of how it was done, the insider said.


https://saraacarter.com/exclusive-google-insider-turns-over-950-pages-of-docs-and-laptop-to-doj/

Official Black List:

Milo, American Thinker, Vdare, ConservativeTreehouse, Twitchy, PatriotPost, others.

1   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 14, 6:43am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Google may sue this guy for theft of intellectual property. I sure their is a non-disclosure agreement somewhere that affects this. Google will likely make an example of this to deter any other whistle blowers.
2   Tim Aurora   ignore (1)   2019 Aug 14, 7:47am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
Google may sue this guy for theft of intellectual property. I sure their is a non-disclosure agreement somewhere that affects this. Google will likely make an example of this to deter any other whistle blowers.


No, the laws prevent prosecuting him. That said, this could be a right wing propaganda to pressure google to take right-wing bias
3   WookieMan   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 14, 7:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
That said, this could be a right wing propaganda to pressure google to take right-wing bias


Or just display search results with no bias? And what laws protect this person? If google has algo's to influence search results, is that illegal? So not sure this is a whistleblower type situation. We'll see.
4   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 14, 8:16am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If they are a content provider they can do whatever, however they are taxed as pass through. Provider vs publisher thing.

WookieMan says
Tim Aurora says
That said, this could be a right wing propaganda to pressure google to take right-wing bias


Or just display search results with no bias? And what laws protect this person? If google has algo's to influence search results, is that illegal? So not sure this is a whistleblower type situation. We'll see.
5   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 14, 6:30pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OP updated with Google News Blacklist.
6   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Aug 14, 10:15pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I wish patrick.net were on that blacklist. Maybe it is. Would be nice to have proof though.
7   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Aug 14, 10:16pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HonkpilledMaster says
OP updated with Google News Blacklist.


And hey thanks @HonkpilledMaster for providing a delicious list of reading material that Google would rather hide from us!
8   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 14, 10:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
And hey thanks @HonkpilledMaster for providing a delicious list of reading material that Google would rather hide from us!


My pleasure. Wow, looking at it again. Glen Beck?! Grabien? Rebel Media? Also, Ebay? That's interesting. Maybe a Google Competitor is on the way.
9   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 15, 8:27am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Wow they banned all conservative outlets they could. And looks like torrent sites as well.
10   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 15, 9:30am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

oh i see they banned some gay shit too, that's funny, how did that slip through the liberals fingers.
11   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 15, 10:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

This whole thing about the algorithm being biased is a strawman. It's not that the algorithm is biased, it's that the data fed to the algorithm, as manipulated by Google SJWs or as manipulated by armies of SJWs outside Google, is biased.

Remember Microsoft's "teen girl AI" on the web a while back? That was presumably non-biased AI that went hilariously awry from people on the web feeding it biased data. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/03/24/microsofts-teen-girl-ai-turns-into-a-hitler-loving-sex-robot-wit/

Then there's internal Google manipulation. Presumably, the Google search algorithm has a blacklist (as required in some countries — and used in the US also). The algorithm isn't biased at all... it finds the results using (presumably) unbiased search algorithm, then, in an unbiased way, deletes the results that match the blacklist. The actual bias isn't in the algorithm, it's in the SJWs that manually place entries in the blacklist. The algorithm presumably has a "promote" list as well, where unbiased hits that match in the "promote" list are promoted to the top; again, it's the Google SJWs who put things in the "promote" list that are biased, not the algorithm.

Rick Santorum is a case study of both systems of bias at once. An organized public SJW movement fed search algorithms data to bias them. Then (for a while) Google refused to blacklist the results of that movement on feeding their algorithms even though they knew the data was purposely fed to manipulate the algorithms. Google frequently blacklists search hits that are a result of data manipulation (i.e.: link farms) if it hurts their advertising revenue, but, apparently, not if the manipulation defames a person whose ideas they don't agree with. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_the_neologism_%22santorum%22

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions