« prev   random   next »

2
1

The coming Dem Shitstorm

By CornPoptheOriginalGangster follow CornPoptheOriginalGangster   2019 Aug 19, 1:49pm 636 views   31 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


Going into Super Tuesday, it will become increasing clear that Biden is definitely not wanted by the Democratic Base and is the Donor's preferred candidate.

He's too centrist, even though his jettisoned most of his long held centrist stances to win the primary, the very same stances that make him remotely electable by Middle America, for the far left base.

Buttigieg, Booker, and O'Rourke have made no headway.

Kamala may rise, though she has problems with her time as SFC DA that hurt her among Progressives, they'll ignore it for Racial Purposes. A Black! Woman! President! Also, Kamala is far more preferable to Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Globalists and therefore will easily raise big money, than Bernie or Warren.

So the battle is between Harris, Bernie, Warren, and Biden.

Frankly, Warren and Bernie are so similar, one wonders if they magically combined to one person, or one dropped out, what the percentage would be.

If it was only Warren or Bernie without the other; I'd expect either would be matching or near matching Biden's number of about 30%.

So here's my prediction:

It'll be Biden vs. Harris, Bernie, or Warren on Super Tuesday; the others won't count. Of all of them, Harris is the strongest pretender to the Democratic Throne.

But no matter what happens, a huge chunk of the Democratic party will be disappointed.
2   OccasionalCortex   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 19, 2:15pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HonkpilledMaster says
they'll ignore it for Racial Purposes. A Black! Woman! President!


Actually, there's practically ZERO Obama Effect going on with her amongst black voters. White Liberals who want to feel 'progressive', yes. But they will vote for Quasimodo if he ended up being the Dem nominee anyway.
3   6rdB   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 19, 2:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HonkpilledMaster says
So the battle is between Harris, Bernie, Warren, and Biden.

Masters of Universe/Media will support either Harris or Warren. Bernie is a no-no as he is anti-corporate, and Biden is too white and has too many senile moments.
4   BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 19, 2:55pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

sounds like another 4 years of donald.
5   6rdB   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 19, 2:58pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

BlueSardine says
sounds like another 4 years of donald

very likely, unless economy takes a nosedive.
6   Quigley   ignore (2)   2019 Aug 19, 3:54pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.

Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
7   HEYYOU   ignore (34)   2019 Aug 19, 3:56pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I hope the loser Dem candidates supporters don't vote for another Dem.
Clintonites stole the primary from Sanders? What are you Sanders supporters going to do? Let the Dems fuck over you again? What's funny is that Sanders will support the dumb Dem.
They gave the last election to Trump.They've done nothing substantial like a nationwide boycott of Rep/Cons.
I can see Trump winning because of the Dems lazy ignorance.
Wait! They are not lazy! They are working hard,bumping their gums.
8   BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 19, 4:04pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tulsi likes being on FOX.
Fox should air live during the debate with tulsi commenting.
except she may be on national guard duty during that time in indonesia.
in which case she can comment from there with a fox cam...

Quigley says
Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.
9   6rdB   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 19, 4:04pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
Makes you go hmmm.

Makes me become a conspiracy theorist - just like when Clinton won coin tossups against Sanders 6 times in row in Iowa - what was the chance of that happening statistically???

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/coin-toss-broke-6-clinton-sanders-deadlocks-in-iowa-and-hillary-won-each-time-2016-02-02

The race between the Democratic presidential hopefuls was so tight in the Iowa caucus Monday that in at least six precincts, the decision on awarding a county delegate came down to a coin toss. And Clinton won all six, media reports said.
10   BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 19, 4:05pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If trump has proven anything it's that there are ways around the oligarchs...

Quigley says
Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.
11   6rdB   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 19, 4:13pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

BlueSardine says
Tulsi likes being on FOX.

MSNPC, CNNPC, etc do not want to hear what Tulsi says and if she is on there, she gets attacked by idiot talking heads.

12   Quigley   ignore (2)   2019 Aug 19, 4:22pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

BlueSardine says
If trump has proven anything it's that there are ways around the oligarchs...

Quigley says
Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.


It’s fine, I never expected her to even get close to the Democrat nomination. Although she was their only hope to regain the White House in 2021.
I expect we can all live with Trump for another four years.
13   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2019 Aug 19, 4:27pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tulsi is out? Wtf?
14   CornPoptheOriginalGangster   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 19, 4:30pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

It's Harris or Biden, agreed.
15   Onvacation   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 19, 4:43pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.

Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.

Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money, but she speaks too many uncomfortable truths.

Either the powers that be prefer another 4 years of Trump or they are clueless.
16   Onvacation   ignore (4)   2019 Aug 19, 4:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I just added Tulsi to my dictionary. I hope she sticks around.
17   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2019 Aug 19, 4:45pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

They won’t let someone win who they can’t control. Tulsi isn’t sell out, at least now, hence it’s all Harris/Biden push.

That’s my opinion.

Onvacation says
Quigley says
Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.

Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.

Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money. She speaks too many uncomfortable truths.

Either the powers that be prefer another 4 years of Trump or they are clueless.
18   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2019 Aug 19, 6:34pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

This is why Obama has to run as Biden's running mate. It seems nobody in the DOJ will prosecute a Democrat Presidential Candidate up against Trump.
That's what kept Hillary's ass out of Jail.
19   EBGuy   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 20, 6:07pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Major Gabbard, reporting for duty. One down, two to go. From NPR:
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has also qualified through fundraising, and she also registered 2% in the CNN poll released Tuesday, but she still needs two additional polls to make the cut.
20   rootvg   ignore (1)   2019 Aug 20, 6:18pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Onvacation says
Quigley says
Tulsi attacked Harris’s record and is consequently shut out of the third debate. She has the donors and has 2% or better in 22 polls, but only has that much in ONE of the DNC-approved polls.
Makes you go hmmm.

Clearly, Harris is preferred by the oligarchs.

Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money, but she speaks too many uncomfortable truths.

Either the powers that be prefer another 4 years of Trump or they are clueless.
Donald Trump's opponent next year has already been predetermined.
That was in the can when the tax bill was passed and signed into law. It wouldn't matter who they run now. It never mattered!
21   rootvg   ignore (1)   2019 Aug 20, 6:20pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HonkpilledMaster says
It's Harris or Biden, agreed.
I really think it's Biden and Gillibrand due to her deep party connections through her father. You can just call them Walter and Gerry.
22   rootvg   ignore (1)   2019 Aug 20, 6:21pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

zzyzzx says
Mark Penn said several weeks ago that higher ups understand what's wrong with the party but it will take time. This is cyclical, happened in the seventies.
23   CornPoptheOriginalGangster   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 20, 6:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rootvg says
I really think it's Biden and Gillibrand due to her deep party connections through her father. You can just call them Walter and Gerry.


Interesting, can you expand?
24   CornPoptheOriginalGangster   ignore (5)   2019 Sep 5, 10:43pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Is it me or is every single one of the Democrats batshit crazy, with the possible exception of Kneepads Kamala?
25   Hircus   ignore (0)   2019 Sep 6, 8:56pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HonkpilledMaster says
Is it me or is every single one of the Democrats batshit crazy, with the possible exception of Kneepads Kamala?


I've been wondering if this is intentional as some kinda strategy.

One thing that comes to mind:

Case 1: Trump does NOT screw up big before the election.
He will be extremely difficult to beat because things are pretty good in America right now. They know they can't win in this case, and so aren't planning for it.

Case 2: Trump DOES screw up big before the election. i.e., economy tanks hard, big corruption comes to light etc...
One of their demlings is very likely to win in this case, mostly on the "I'm someone who isn't Trump" basis. In this case, if everyone is a crazy leftist, then they will get to make huge "progress", taking full advantage of the situation. Normally, they wouldn't be able to win an election while cramming such leftist lunacy down Americans' throats, but the crazy policy won't matter so much in this scenario, as being a NotTrump is the more important aspect. If they're all far left, then Americans can choose between Chocolate or Vanilla far left flavors, but it will be far left either way.

I suspect they have more dirt on Trump and will deploy it at the last minute. If the dirt is good, Rep party won't have time to put up a new candidate, and the American herd will panic vote for a dem.

Espescially w/ how they all got their radical lib on via FREE! health care for illegals - they clearly colluded and agreed to unify on that position at the first dem debate. If they all unify on it, it's sure to get done as long as Trump loses.
26   Hircus   ignore (0)   2019 Sep 6, 9:00pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Another thing that comes to mind is that even if they know they will lose 2020, if they all get their radical lib on, it shapes future politics and sentiment.

There's a lot of never-Trumps, and they will listen to dems regardless, and let them influence their opinion on what is "right" and woke and justice. If they all scream this radical leftist crap loudly for 2 yrs leading up to the election, it gets people comfortable with the ideas, priming the populace for these ideas to be advanced again for the 2024 election when they actually have a chance. Plus, left media is a good team player for them, and will pump the ideas and write years of articles "teaching" people why it's racist to not give free healthcare to illegals etc...

or

Many of the candidates are just decoys for reasons stated above, purely to shape narrative and sentiment. They know they're fake, but say what they're told, earning woke points for being a team player, helping make another dem candidate look more reasonable, and focusing votes to them. I've always suspected these "decoys" exist in elections.
27   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (0)   2019 Sep 6, 10:40pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I'm not sure Biden will make it to Super Tuesday on March 3rd. The mental and physical gaffs keep coming.

Kamala was my original bet 6 months ago, but the others can keep picking on choice bits of her past. She comes off as mean.

Tulsi Gabbard will be crushed by the Democrat establishment because she doesn't toe the party line.

Sanders... destroyed by the Democrat establishment previous time. Same will happen this time.

Yang, Buttigieg, Booker... not ready for prime-time yet.

That leaves Harris as the Democrat primary winner.
28   willywonka   ignore (4)   2019 Sep 7, 5:21am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Sanders-Warren. A co-presidency.
29   mell   ignore (3)   2019 Sep 7, 8:59am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I also think Biden or Warren/sanders.
30   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2019 Sep 7, 9:15am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Kampala Harris is probably shadow chosen.

They kicked Tulsi out when she gave Kamala shit.
31   CornPoptheOriginalGangster   ignore (5)   2019 Sep 7, 11:09am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Hircus says
Many of the candidates are just decoys for reasons stated above, purely to shape narrative and sentiment. They know they're fake, but say what they're told, earning woke points for being a team player, helping make another dem candidate look more reasonable, and focusing votes to them. I've always suspected these "decoys" exist in elections.


Absolutely.

It happened in the 2016 Republican Primary. There's a reason Trump went after Jeb, despite his appalling numbers.

The plan all along was to make Jeb the compromise candidate: Kasich delivered Ohio/Rustbelt, Cruz Texas and the Social Cons, and Rubio the Florida/Liberal Republicans. They would all "agree" on Jeb at the Convention when none of them had enough votes.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions