2
0

Trump considering non-tarrif measures against china, such as restricting their companies from being listed on us stock exchanges


 invite response                
2019 Sep 27, 10:35pm   981 views  7 comments

by Hircus   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

Looks like Trump is cranking up the fuck-a-you meter against China. Seems like he wants more than just tariffs, and is looking at other alternative forms of leverage that can be used to bitch slap them back down in their place.


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stock-market-hits-session-low-amid-report-that-white-house-weighing-limit-on-us-investments-in-china-2019-09-27
U.S. stock indexes took a leg lower Friday afternoon, relinquishing modest gains, after a report that the White House is considering a limit to Chinese companies trading on U.S. exchanges, according to Bloomberg News. The article, citing people familiar, indicates that a crackdown on capital flows would intensify the tariff battle being waged between the world's biggest economies, just as the parties have set an Oct. 10-11 date to meet in Washington to resolve their differences on trade and intellectual-property rights. Under consideration is a delisting of China-based stocks that trade on U.S. exchanges and removing some of those companies from certain funds.


I must admit when I first heard of his tariff strategy years ago, I thought "only as a temporary negotiation tool" but now I feel different. The more I think about it, the more I feel that China is a serious threat to us, and that all power that we allow them to accumulate will be used against us. Like how they swore up and down to Obama that the S. China Sea wouldn't be militarized, and then right away they started making buildings, lol'ing in our face by leaving out the key distinctions that would make them "military buildings" until they were almost done, and then they militarized it as a final step. "lol those stupid round-eyes".

Tariffs may hurt our economy, but there's a bigger strategic picture to look at here IMO. If we play our cards right, we can probably get a decent amount of manufacturing to move to other non-china countries, which is good for us because it keeps competition in the markets, and keeps china from acquiring too much leverage and power - power that they will no doubt use in a monopolistic fashion against us. Also, if we keep them from getting too powerful, it will likely save us significant military costs too.

Continuing the same path we've had with china is like charging up a credit card. It feels good in the short term, but it will ruin us. The right solution is to change course and get off the china rickshaw-ride, and stick a leg out to trip them while were at it - making them fall on their face.

Comments 1 - 7 of 7        Search these comments

1   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Sep 27, 11:38pm  

The Financial Situation in China is very precarious. They've been propping up overinvestment and all kinds of crap industries, and it was fine as long as US-China Trade was increasing, but it's going to be hard to keep the shell game going unless exports not only remain stable but grow drastically.
3   HeadSet   2019 Oct 3, 8:08am  

I bet China really wants Trump out of office, and replaced with someone China has bought and paid for like Biden.
4   NDrLoR   2019 Oct 3, 8:14am  

zzyzzx says
..."by a dirty little yellow-bellied slanty eyed Chink"
5   rocketjoe79   2019 Oct 3, 9:01pm  

I have nothing against the Chinese People. But their government is the complete antithesis of American values. Since the Chinese government is clearly doing everything they can to subvert all other non-communist regimes and become a global superpower, it's in our best interests to stop them. Cold. The dream of fairly trading with them, stopping their carbon emissions, or preventing egregious IP theft and outright cyberwarfare is simply that: a dream. Easier, I say, to simply stop doing business. Decouple. They will dwindle and choke and crumble, as every other socialist regime eventually does. Might be 20 years, maybe 50, but they too shall go.

And if they aren't making stuff for the rest of the world, will not their emissions decrease, as well? Problem solved.
6   Hircus   2019 Oct 3, 9:13pm  

rocketjoe79 says
The dream of fairly trading with them, stopping their carbon emissions, or preventing egregious IP theft and outright cyberwarfare is simply that: a dream.


7   richwicks   2019 Oct 3, 11:50pm  

Until we end our trade gap between nations we have to disinvest from them, regardless of what problems this may cause the US citizen because the toilet paper we call the US dollar isn't going to be the world's reserve currency forever. It should have ended with the Nixon Shock, we're nearly 50 years over-due.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions